• About Us
  • Feedback
  • Events Calendar
  • Archives
  • Newsletter
Advanced Search
  • Home
  • News
  • Views
  • GovNow
  • GovNext
  • Login
  • Register
News
  • Top Stories
  • Public Reporter
  • Photo Story
  • Protests & Petitions
  • GNtv
Views
  • Day's Debate
  • Columns
  • Think Tank
  • Interview
  • GNtalk
  • Backstory
GovNow
  • Parliament
  • Your MP
  • Bureaucracy
  • Judiciary
  • Policy
GovNext
  • RTI
  • eGov
  • GreenGov
  • GovPitch
Follow Us
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS
Home › SC quashes defamation case against environmentalists

SC quashes defamation case against environmentalists

Pesticide companies say the report is malicious; activists say it is about human health and ecology.
GN Bureau | August 06 2010

Share

A criminal defamation case against 11 activists for publishing a report on pesticide use in the cotton belt of Warangal district of Andhra Pradesh was quashed by a two Judge bench in the Supreme Court last month.

The case was filed by Crop Care Federation (formerly Pesticides Associations of India), a consortium of pesticide manufacturing companies against the activists in the magistrate's court of Warangal for publishing a report titled "The Killing Fields of Warangal" in 2002.

The report was an investigation of the impacts of pesticides use in the district and was complied after interacting with the farmers, doctors in the area who treated the patients affected by spraying of pesticides, officials in the district including joint director- agriculture and other stakeholders in the district. It was termed defamatory by the largest and most powerful pesticide companies in the country.

In its judgement on 20th July, the Supreme Court observed that “The general tenor of the report indicates that the report meant to focus the harmful effects of exposure to pesticides. It is quite evident from the report that it was not meant to harm, hurt or defame any individual or the manufacturing company”.

The Federation initiated criminal proceedings against the members of the fact-finding team and others associated with the publishing of the said report stating that the report is a malicious and defamatory attempt by the members of the team to defame the pesticide manufacturers and traders among the general public, thereby affecting their credibility and their business. Whereas, the activists say the objective was neither against any industry, nor against any particular association. The concern was about human health and ecology as a whole.

The Warangal court had issued non-bailable arrest warrants against some of the accused in 2007, after Andhra Pradesh High Court had dismissed the appeal to quash the proceedings.

The fact finding team of the report consisted of representatives of organisations involved with agricultural issues in rural areas, sustainable development, environmental protection and related public health issues. This included representatives of Toxics Link (New Delhi), Community Health Cell (Bangalore) and Sarvodaya Youth Organization (Warangal).

The list of  those who were charged included: Dr. Rajan R Patil (Epidemiologist), Ms. Madhumita Dutta (Corporate Accountability Desk – The Other Media), Mr. Ravi Agarwal (Toxics Link), Dr. D. Narasimha Reddy, Mr. P. Damoder (Sarvodaya Youth Organisation), Mr. Rajesh Rangarajan (formerly with Toxics Link),  Ms. Abitha Anand (independent Journalist), Salil Chaturvedi (Splash Communications), Kishore Wankhade (formerly with GGF) and others.
 

Related stories

Stories you might like

Law Min seeks AG's opinion on 2G judgement
Zakia disappointed with SIT's 'clean chit' to Modi
Matter of honour: Raja to appeal SC to expunge remarks
"Centre has assured support to Uninor"
Two more cyber labs to come up in AP

More stories in this section

HP offers land for TERI centre
MoEF issues show-cause notice to OPG Power Gujarat
Youth Cong to hold rally extolling Koodankulam project
Comments posted as an unregistered user will need to be approved by an editor. If you would like to post comments without delay, please register / login.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Input format
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters (without spaces) shown in the image.

In This Section

  • Most Emailed
  • Most Popular
  • Most Commented
  • The man who nailed Nithari’s lies...
  • Fighting corruption through RTI ...
  • File complaints with Maha police online ...
  • Extensive broadband usage to make OECD richer...
2G anna hazare Bihar BJP CBI china congress corruption Delhi DoT e-governance facebook Gujarat High Court India jairam ramesh Kapil Sibal Karnataka Maharashtra Manmohan Singh Mumbai parliament P Chidambaram Pranab Mukherjee prime minister rajya sabha RTI supreme court US Uttar Pradesh
more tags
News
  • Top Stories
  • Public Reporter
  • Photo Story
  • Protests & Petitions
  • GNtv
Views
  • Day's Debate
  • Columns
  • Think Tank
  • Interview
  • GNtalk
  • Backstory
GovNow
  • Parliament
  • Your MP
  • Bureaucracy
  • Judiciary
  • Policy
GovNext
  • RTI
  • eGov
  • GreenGov
  • GovPitch
Follow Us
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS
Copyright ©2010 Governance Now
  • Copyright Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Help
  • Advertise with us
  • Careers
  • Contact Us
Developed by LDI