• About Us
  • Feedback
  • Events Calendar
  • Archives
  • Newsletter
Advanced Search
  • Home
  • News
  • Views
  • GovNow
  • GovNext
  • Login
  • Register
Home › GovNow › Judiciary › Land acquisition is illegal if owners are not intimated: SC

Land acquisition is illegal if owners are not intimated: SC

Says authorities bound to notify the affected persons through media notifications
PTI | June 29 2012

Share

Land acquistion proceedings will become illegal if government fails to observe the mandatory requirement of issuing public notices to the affected parties, the Supreme Court has held, quashing Maharashtra government's acquisition of a piece of land for a defence unit.

A bench of justices H L Dattu and A R Dave said that besides notifying the acquisition in the official gazette, the authorities were bound to notify the affected persons through media notifications in at least two newspapers in the local region.

"Since the mandatory requirement as required under Section 4(1) of the Act is not complied with by the respondents, while acquiring the land in question, in our opinion, the entire acquisition proceedings requires to be declared as null and void.

"We restrict the claim of the appellants only to 50 per cent of the land in question, namely, land in Survey No.119/3 Pt situated at Village Malad, Taluka, Borivali, District Bombay Suburban," the bench said in an order.

Petitioner Kulsum Nadiadwala and other legal heirs of one Ismail Nadiadwala had filed the appeal in the apex court challenging a Bombay High Court order refusing to quashing the acquistion.

On 24.10.1975, the state government had issued a notification under

Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, to acquire certain pieces of land situated in different villages for the purpose of establishing Central Ordinance Depot.

According to the appellants, they were the legal heirs of deceased Ismail Nadiadwala and the land was jointly owned by him with Ibrahim Nadiadwala.

But the authorities issued no notice to the them and, after hearing only Ibrahim Nadiadwala, an award came to be passed by the state government on September 23, 1986.

Related stories

Stories you might like

It's not porn but misogyny that triggers rape
Final Coalgate verdict: SC wants dour agents to quiz, not relate
SC against prompt arrests of social media users for posts
Did Ashwani and Bansal quit or were they axed?
Kumar at PMO gets ringtone alert: merey to law lag gaye

More stories in this section

PIL on Praful Patel hand in Air India going red
Sohrabuddin case: SC wants trial to be shifted
Bathani Tola carnage: SC admits appeals against acquittals

In This Section

  • Most Emailed
  • Most Popular
  • Most Commented
  • Cong MPs from Telangana step up pressure on C...
  • Central staff will have only 14 holidays in 2...
  • Centre's nod for NRIP expansion...
  • North Delhi MLA Mangat Ram Singhal’s report c...
anna hazare Bihar BJP CBI china congress corruption Delhi e-governance facebook Gujarat High Court India jairam ramesh Kapil Sibal Karnataka Maharashtra Manmohan Singh Mumbai Narendra Modi parliament P Chidambaram Pranab Mukherjee prime minister rajya sabha RTI Sonia Gandhi supreme court UPA Uttar Pradesh
more tags
News
  • Top Stories
  • Public Reporter
  • Photo Story
  • Protests & Petitions
  • GNtv
Views
  • Day's Debate
  • Columns
  • Think Tank
  • Interview
  • GNtalk
  • Backstory
GovNow
  • Parliament
  • Your MP
  • Bureaucracy
  • Judiciary
  • Policy
GovNext
  • RTI
  • eGov
  • GreenGov
  • GovPitch
Follow Us
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS
Copyright ©2010 Governance Now
  • Copyright Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Help
  • Advertise with us
  • Careers
  • Contact Us
  • Sitemap