• About Us
  • Feedback
  • Events Calendar
  • Archives
  • Newsletter
Advanced Search
  • Home
  • News
  • Views
  • GovNow
  • GovNext
  • Login
  • Register
Home › GovNow › Judiciary › SC refuses to stay Guj HC order on religious structures

SC refuses to stay Guj HC order on religious structures

The apex court wanted to know if any survey or study was conducted on the actual damage and loss to holy places during the Godhra riots
PTI | July 03 2012

Share

The Supreme Court has refused to entertain the Narendra Modi government's plea for staying the Gujarat High Court's February 8 order to pay compensation to over 500 shrines damaged during the infamous 2002 riots in wake of Godhra train carnage.

While declining to entertain the plea, a bench of justices K S Radhakrishnan and Dipak Misra also asked the state government to furnish details of the number of religious structures actually damaged and the financial cost of their reconstruction.

The apex court wanted to know if any survey or study was conducted on the actual damage and loss to holy places during the riots. The bench later adjourned the matter for July 9.

Appearing for the state, Additional Advocate General Tushar Mehta and counsel Hemantika Wahi submitted that the high court order was erroneous as under the Constitution's secular principles, there cannot be funding to religious bodies by any government.

On February 8, the Gujarat government was pulled up by the Gujarat High Court for "inaction and negligence" on its part during the 2002 post-Godhra riots that led to large-scale destruction of religious structures.

A division bench of Acting Chief Justice Bhaskar Bhattacharya and Justice J B Pardiwala had ordered compensation for over 500 places of worships in the state on a plea by Islamic Relief Committee of Gujarat (IRCG), an NGO.

The court also ordered that principal judges of 26 districts of the state will receive the applications for compensation of religious structures in their respective districts and decide on it. They have been asked to send their decisions to the high court within six months.

Related stories

Stories you might like

SC stops Italian ambassador from leaving India
SC extends stay on execution of Veerappan aides
SC stays death sentence of Veerappan's aides
SC notice to Sahara for not refunding Rs 24,000 crore
SC raps centre, states on missing children report

More stories in this section

PIL on Praful Patel hand in Air India going red
Sohrabuddin case: SC wants trial to be shifted
Bathani Tola carnage: SC admits appeals against acquittals

In This Section

  • Most Emailed
  • Most Popular
  • Most Commented
  • Cong MPs from Telangana step up pressure on C...
  • Central staff will have only 14 holidays in 2...
  • Centre's nod for NRIP expansion...
  • North Delhi MLA Mangat Ram Singhal’s report c...
anna hazare Bihar BJP CBI china congress corruption Delhi e-governance facebook Gujarat High Court India jairam ramesh Kapil Sibal Karnataka Maharashtra Manmohan Singh Mumbai Narendra Modi parliament P Chidambaram Pranab Mukherjee prime minister rajya sabha RTI Sonia Gandhi supreme court UPA Uttar Pradesh
more tags
News
  • Top Stories
  • Public Reporter
  • Photo Story
  • Protests & Petitions
  • GNtv
Views
  • Day's Debate
  • Columns
  • Think Tank
  • Interview
  • GNtalk
  • Backstory
GovNow
  • Parliament
  • Your MP
  • Bureaucracy
  • Judiciary
  • Policy
GovNext
  • RTI
  • eGov
  • GreenGov
  • GovPitch
Follow Us
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS
Copyright ©2010 Governance Now
  • Copyright Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Help
  • Advertise with us
  • Careers
  • Contact Us
  • Sitemap