‘Preamble’ controversy: The argument for the change is flawed in its genesis
Shishir Tripathi | January 29, 2015
All through my student years while reading the NCERT (National Council of Educational Research and Training) books, two things which always fascinated me were Gandhi’s Talisman and the Preamble of India.
The first dealt with the basic philosophy and the guiding principles behind the actions of “we the people” and the other talked about that of the state.
Apart from stating what the Indian state should be doing to ensure a just society, the Preamble also clearly stated what the edifice of the Indian state as an ideological construct should be.
Apart from learning about in the constitutional amendments, there was nothing which made me feel that the Preamble I was reading all these years was not the “original” one, that was enacted in 1950 by the constituent assembly.
For me, the country I live in was, in many ways, if not in absolute terms, was everything that the Preamble stated. For me, it was SOVEREIGN SOCIALIST SECULAR DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC.
I never read ‘socialist’ and ‘secular’ in isolation. I never felt it was an imposed derivative to the original “Idea of India”. Socialist and secular was added by the 42 constitutional amendment Act in 1976.
Even though I lived in a communally charged town of Uttar Pradesh, where every election was preceded by a communal conflict followed by communal polarisation, it never felt that a theocratic state was breathing down my neck. I did not get any concession for belonging to an upper caste brahmin family nor was I disadvantaged for that. In spite of all the rhetoric of India being a secular state, and figuring it out to instead be a pseudo-secular state, later in college, I never doubted the Nehruvian philosophy expressed in these two words, “socialist and secular”.
The word socialist was also not a misnomer for me. The daily dose of entertainment, which I looked forward to after coming back from school, was broadcast by state-owned Doordarshan and came for free. The train in which I travelled to my grandmother’s place every summer was also owned by the Indian state. Later, while working as a journalist and covering railways I realised that a greater part of the expense that was incurred on my summer sojourns was borne by our “socialist” state.
The whole debate over omitting the word “socialist and secular” from the Preamble leaves me baffled and with two simple questions. These questions arise out of the questions raised by those who want to re-frame the constitutional philosophy.
Why do we need to keep these words: we are secular anyways, whether these words exist or not in the Preamble. Fair enough. It seems a valid argument. But I will accept it only if I get an answer for my question.
Are we “SOVEREIGN DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC” because it is stated in the Preamble? Certainly not. We are “sovereign democratic republic” because of our constitution, which prescribes free and fair elections and calls for an elected head of state.
So should we omit all these words?
Constitutional expert N A Palkhiwala says Preamble is the “identity card” of the constitution. Can we alter the identity card without altering the identity itself? If we tend to do so there will be a mismatch. A mismatch, which will not only look odd, but will also make the “Idea of India” a sham.
The Narendra Modi government has set aside Rs 52,393 crore in 2017-18 for the welfare of the dalits. On the face of it, the amount is substantial. However, an analysis of the past actual allocation shows that there has in fact been a dip in spending on schemes that are specifically meant only for dalits.
“I will always try and it is also my belief that the president’s post should be above politics,” said NDA’s presidential candidate Ram Nath Kovind who filed the nomination papers on Friday. “Since the time I became governor, I am no longe
A lot of debate that we witness in the media on the cattle question these days suffer from the disease of speculative utopian imagination of a ‘cow-nation’ and relentless abuses for those beef-eating ‘others’. Political debates over the question of o
Ramin Jahanbegloo is a renowned philosopher who is now associated with the Jindal Global University. His latest work, The Decline of Civilization, calls for countering the ‘decivilising’ tendencies of our times by returning to Gandhi and Tagore. Jahanbegloo answered s
Should CBSE prepone the board exams?
In this nationalistic age, sports seem to play an important role, and in India, this can be seen during cricket matches. For most, a victory symbolises prestige and supremacy. On Sunday, India lost to Pakistan in the final match of the ICC Champions Trophy. The defea