A Muslim-dominated village of Uttar Pradesh formed the backdrop of a famous partition saga. What this microcosm of India reveals about the coming elections
Ajay Singh | April 19, 2014
Gangauli in Ghazipur district of eastern Uttar Pradesh is not just another village. Nearly 60 km from the district headquarters, this village on the banks of the Ganga owes its fame to the novelist Rahi Masoom Raza and his masterpiece Aadha Gaon (Half a Village). The novel examines how Muslims viewed the idea of Pakistan at the time of India’s partition. In Raza’s narrative, Gangauli appears like a microcosm of India. More than six decades later, it remains so.
It is difficult to say whether Gangauli’s story immortalised Raza or the great novelist’s imagination confabulated facts and fiction, to weave the captivating narrative of Gangauli as a miniature India. But it is readily known that Gangauli is a great attraction for those curious about India – more particularly about eastern UP.
Negotiating a difficult terrain from Varanasi to Ghazipur, we took a narrow but better road that connected the village to the district headquarters. As we entered the village, oversize graffiti on a village wall offered “sure cure” for low sperm count. That was the first indication of Gangauli’s eternal yearning for machismo.
The search for Raza’s house led us to a sprawling residence of the local Samajwadi Party legislator, Shadab Fatima. Her young brother, Saiyyad Saqib, who has studied engineering in Pune, greeted us. “We were all a family,” he said, indicating that though Raza’s ancestral home is somewhere else, they belong to the same family tree.
In the novel, this locality is called Saiyyad Bara, the place of the Saiyyads (at the top of the Muslim caste hierarchy). Posters and banners of the Samajwadi Party abound in this locality and make people’s political preference clear. “There is no Modi effect in this part of the town,” Saqib said.
But this does not hold true for the entire village. A minority population of Hindus proclaims its loyalty to the BJP and its prime ministerial candidate Narendra Modi. Yet there is no tension in the air. Political choices of people do not vitiate the atmosphere in Gangauli – it generates only debate. This is why a mosque with domes similar to those of the Babri mosque stands only a few yards away from a grand Shiva temple – on land donated by a Saiyyad landlord. By all indications, Gangauli is unfazed by the tempestuous politics of Ghazipur, Varanasi, Lucknow or Delhi.
Saqib described communal harmony with a metaphor: “Hum log namak mirch aur masala mein paani dene ka kaam kartein hain (we dilute the communal situation when it aggravates).” Thus, when Muzaffarnagar and its neighbouring areas in western UP were burning in a communal frenzy late last year, this village and its surroundings remain unfazed.
This easygoing approach of village life drew Raza to pick up the story of Gangauli to explain the cataclysmic events before, during and after the partition. Aadha Gaon is a story of the Indian ethos that refuses to be swayed or defeated in the face of several onslaughts.
Gangauli is an archetypal Indian village with all its social strengths and vulnerabilities, all the while hanging on to its distinct identity. This is why we concluded our 3,000 km journey crisscrossing Uttar Pradesh, from Ghaziabad to Ghazipur, in Gangauli. Its backdrop is a valuable point of reference in the larger story of India’s largest state.
IN A STATE polarised along religious lines – it has suffered 100-odd communal riots in the past two years – the yearning for good governance has mutated into a desire for a superman, a saviour to rid society of all its ills. The graffiti on Gangauli’s walls, advertising treatment for lost virility, is a symptom of the syndrome that afflicts the state. It prevails in western UP, the region worst affected by communal violence; riots have recently hit Ghaziabad, Meerut and Muzaffarnagar.
This was quite evident in our tour to the riot-affected areas of Muzaffarnagar in February. About five months after the violence that shook the nation’s conscience, Kawal township – the epicentre of rioting – was peaceful.
Rioting had started on September 7 from Kawal and spread to neighbouring towns and villages, claiming 59 lives, displacing more than 50,000 from rural areas where they had been living for generations, and destroying property. An incident of harassment of a Jat girl triggered the killing of a Muslim and, in revenge, counter-killing of two brothers of the girl.
The riots tore through the social fabric of the region. Several villages in Muzaffarnagar and Shamli, where Jats and Muslims lived in relative peace, have become segregated along communal lines. Refugees have refused to return home, fearing fresh violence.
There is talk that western UP is intensely polarised along communal lines and that this will reflect in political choices in the coming elections. The implicit message being the consolidation of Hindu votes will favour the BJP in general and Narendra Modi in particular.
Ground realities, though, do not support this assumption. We met a scheduled caste man who was not particularly perturbed over the supposed polarisation. “There is no reason for us to hate Muslims,” said the man, who makes his two ends meet by performing menial jobs for his Jat landlords. He added that barring a brief spell of clashes between Jats and Muslims, the area had remained largely peaceful.
Shyam Khatik, owner of about 40 bigha land adjacent to Kawal town, draws from a similar equanimity. He is more forthright in his assessment of the situation. “We are not aware of any targeted attacks on Hindu girls by Muslims in this area, though what happened in Muzaffarnagar might be an aberration,” he said, adding that the domineering behaviour of the Jat landlords is as much frowned upon as hooliganism by a section of Musilms. “Normally the internal dynamics of village politics take care of such problems,” he said, making it clear that the riots resulted from a failure of the informal corrective mechanism.
This points to a disturbing aspect of the village polity: such failures are not episodic, they are endemic in UP. With the state increasingly seen as an effete and partisan institution, the vacuum is filled by those enjoying the clout of money and muscle. Such a setting naturally favours musclemen masquerading as politicians. The stage is ideal for macho posturing. If BJP’s Suresh Rana and Sangeet Som, both legislators, are seen as protectors of the Hindus, Samajwadi Party’s Kadir Rana and party MLAs Noor Saleem Rana and Maulana Jamil enjoy a Robin Hood-like image among Muslims.
Yet there is no sign of rancour in the relief camp at Jaula village near the Muzaffarnagar-Shamli border, where hundreds of Muslim families from neighbouring villages took refuge.
Though they have been uprooted from their homes and villages, the refugees here do not speak of revenge; they want to move on, to a better life. “I have completed my BA and want to study more,” said Mohammad Raees. Relief operations were in full swing thanks to generous support from voluntary organisations. “We want the government to be sincere about rehabilitating these families,” said a member of the relief committee.
About 50 km from Muzaffarnagar, at the Chaudhary Charan Singh University (formerly Meerut University), vice-chancellor VC Goel is man who knows such matters. He has handled several communal riots before retiring from the Indian Police Service. He sees these riots as a manifestation of hypocrisy. “We talk about secularism but scarcely practise it even on our educational campuses,” he commented, alluding to a larger failure of the public life and politics.
The Muzaffarnagar riots are a classic case of increasingly marginalised and ineffectual role of the state in governance. One of the seniormost police officers tasked to control the riots confided with us that it would not be wrong to say that riots served the political interests of all key parties – the BSP, SP and the BJP. In his view, the BJP was expecting a windfall from Hindu consolidation while the BSP was the least bothered as Jats never formed its support base.
“Mulayam Singh Yadav expected that a brief spell of riots would drive the minority towards the SP,” said the officer who claimed to have been persistently prevented by chief minister Akhilesh Yadav from taking tough measures like arresting troublemakers to bring the situation under immediate control.
With the state “withering away” fast, macho men abound in all parties. They do not hesitate from exhibiting their manliness by organising killings and riots at the slightest pretext, knowing well that they can get away.
A glaring example was the killing of a young deputy superintendent of police, Zia Ul Haque, at Kunda of Pratapgarh district last year, as also the manner in which the crime was addressed. During our travel across the state, we came across posters of several history-sheeters proclaiming themselves to be agents of good governance.
In a state beset by recurring riots, there are several omens in the run-up to the elections. People seem fed up with the usual political rhetoric, and on the lookout for the superman who can set right every wrong in society and politics. Such desperation creates a background to paint Modi as a saviour who apparently turned Gujarat into an ideal state. For example, a tea vendor named Kushwaha in Ghazipur feels Modi would replicate Gujarat in his town. “In Modi’s Gujarat, no criminal dares to touch women even if they are wearing tonnes of gold,” he said. His view is based on what he heard from migrant workers of his town employed in Gujarat.
There is little doubt that across the state, Modi is emerging in people’s perception as a saviour who will reform the rest of India into the ideal state of Gujarat. Is this possible? Nobody is interested in the answer. Those who have not forgotten the story of Aadha Gaon notice a familiar script in today’s Gangauli. In pre-partition times, a section of Muslims perceived Pakistan as a utopia and Mohammad Ali Jinnah as the saviour.
The idea of visiting Gangauli was certainly not to compare the situation then and now. It was more to explore the nature of the political discourse. That remains unchanged.
In Aadha Gaon, Muslims of Gangauli rejected outright the idea of Pakistan as alien to their way of life. In all these years, Gangauli has not failed India. Perhaps a novelist cut from the same block as Raza should revisit the Aadha Gaon and show the larger truth in yet another riveting story in the contemporary context. Despite its faultlines – and it has many – this village retains that subtle idea of the Indian ethos.
Does AAP continue to suffer from political immaturity?
There`s a popular folktale shaped by the tongues of the bards and storytellers of Rajasthan about the folly of Rajputs. A Rajput crossing a dense, dark jungle falls into a dry, abandoned well. He is trapped for hours till a passing youth throws him a rope and pulls him up. Nea
The Canadian PM has received an official reception by the prime minister of India Narendra Modi on Friday at the Rashtrapati Bhavan. The two are expected to talk some serious business at the bilateral meeting, and are expected to focus on trade, defence, civil nuclear cooperation, space, tackling climate c
Have you used Rotomac pen? The brand is owned by a Kanpur-based Kothari family, which owns Rotomac Global, now under CBI and ED scanner for round-tripping. Rotomac Global is run by Vikram Kothari, who is also the managing director with the firm. A key allegation against Kothari is that he o
India is faring worse and worse on Transparency International’s ‘Corruption Perception Index’: the latest for 2017 shows India ranking a poor 81 (placed between Ghana and Morocco) and the same 40 points out of 100 as the previous year. In 2015 and 2014, the number stood at 38 and
During his reply on the Motion of Thanks to the Address of the President of India, in the Lok Sabha on February 7, prime minister Narendra Modi compared his government`s efforts to curb corruption and flush out black money to Swachh Bharat Abhiyan – the nationwide mission launched to clean up cities,