Binny & Co has hurt AAP where it hurts most: its core idea

Having built up AAP as almost an anti-party party in public imagination, intra-party rancour and wrangling would hurt AAP more than its founder-members are willing to accept at the moment

shantanu

Shantanu Datta | January 16, 2014


Loose cannons: Vinod Kumar Binny (centre) and Kumar Vishwas (left).
PTI/ FILE PHOTO

It was a bright and sunny winter morning, just over a fortnight ago, when Arvind Kejriwal, fresh after taking oath as the new chief minister of Delhi, told thousands of people gathered at Ramlila Maidan in Delhi, and beamed nationally by all TV stations: We had to form a party to get rid of arrogant, power-hungry and corrupt politicians, and I hope no one else has to form a party to weed us out.

Like the winter fog that has enveloped the national capital region over the last few days, the new chief minister’s blood pressure and anxiety levels must have shot through the roof in these days as his worst fears seem to be coming true. The “revolution” that Kejriwal spoke of on December 28 (“I want to thank God for the success of our revolution”) seems to be coming unstuck at a time it should have attained newer heights, with renowned personalities joining his Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) just as fast as ordinary citizens are signing up to stand by the ‘jhaadoo’, or broom.

While Vinod Kumar Binny, the former Congressman who became MLA by trouncing AK Walia, finance minister in the previous Sheila Dikshit cabinet, in his backyard (east Delhi’s Laxmi Nagar), is the obvious source of inflammation for the nascent party, signs are bad, if not ominous, for AAP on other fronts as well. First, Kejriwal’s much-vaunted janta darbar came a cropper –ironically by the single crucial factor that has helped the AAP surge: the crowd – and then there were protests more than once outside the Delhi Secretariat by people and organisations that claim to have supported the party and now critiquing it for purported failure to implement its promises.

Senior AAP leader Prashant Bhushan’s open-mouth surgery on the army’s role in Jammu and Kashmir was a mini-heart attack for the party, as was new joinee Mallika Sarabhai’s verbal assault on another senior leader Kumar Vishwas’s views on minorities and women and what Sarabhai, the stridently anti-Modi/BJP social activist who contested as an independent in the last Lok Sabha polls in Gujarat, calls a “pro-Modi” stance. Then there’s fellow new joinee Capt Gopinath’s opposition to the party’s negation of FDI in retail (another new comrade former banker Meera Sanyal’s views on the FDI issue is not known yet), and AAP’s cup of woes seems to be full, if not running over.

While it’s normal, in fact, welcome in a ‘regular’ party for members and leaders to air different, indeed contrarian or divergent views for the sake of greater intra-party democracy, AAP’s case is different. For, Kejriwal and Yogendra Yadav’s, and indeed all stakeholders’ – including that of the most important element, the aam aadmi’s – emphasis from day one has been that AAP is unlike a traditional political party. In fact, it’s a unique selling proposition, so to speak, has been the party’s anti-party stance in a way.
And in that lies the biggest loss of face for AAP, or the “revolution” that Kejriwal spoke of on December 28, which now seems farther than the calendar page that has gone off the wall – along with the calendar.

Along similar lines, the academic in Yadav can well rebut Binny’s second outburst (he had earlier wrangled for a cabinet berth before making up with Kejriwal) point by well-meaning point, and leave some extra points on his own, but it won’t take away from Binny’s charge that Kejriwal and the AAP government in Delhi is failing to fulfil its promises. For, it’s a charge – its foundation be damned – that has found buyers not only among the hyperactive pro-Modi infantry on social media but even among many foot soldiers and sympathisers of AAP who braved the Delhi heat, rains, muck, chill, fog and the heat and muck of online scorn, cynicism and even slander to add voice and muscle to the party.

As Yadav made it clear in his press address on Thursday (January 17), "We are hurt by Binny-bhai's statements. There is scope for disagreement and dissent in AAP, but it shouldn't be made public. There is no choice for the party but to take disciplinary action against Binny and issue a show-cause notice to him.”

While the rest of the ‘action’ is in line with any mainstream party, the interesting word here is the “hurt” Yadav issued. And that hurt is not just emotional but political as well.

 

Comments

 

Other News

People of Delhi now hate Kejriwal: Vijay Goel

What is your perception about Arvind Kejriwal’s brand of politics?   In Delhi, after the BJP and the Congress, people wanted to give the Aam Aadmi Party a chance. However, after the Delhi assembly polls, his (Kejriwal`s) political fortune has been on the declin

BHEL’s biggest foreign power project takes off in Bangladesh

Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited’s biggest export order, valued at Rs 10,000 crore for setting up 1,320 MW Maitree thermal power project in Bangladesh has taken-off following the issuance of the ‘notice to proceed’ by the developer.   BHEL said that it won a

For a free and open access

Mozilla is working on two separate goals in net neutrality. One is to bring everyone online; ensure that everyone has access to the internet. The other is to ensure that the network should remain open and diverse. We want people to have access to the whole diversity of the internet and not just in

RSGL, GAIL Gas to set up gas infra in Rajasthan

In a significant step towards setting up of retail gas infrastructure in Rajasthan and opening CNG corridors to connect key cities, a business transfer agreement (BTA) was signed between Rajasthan State Gas Limited (RSGL) & GAIL Gas Ltd.   The agreement is aimed at transf

The might of monies

India Today conducted a cash-for-vote sting operation in the recent assembly polls which revealed how candidates were blatantly violating election commission (EC) guidelines by bribing voters. It also exposed large amounts of money being spent in campaigning as some leaders admitted to spending sev

Why India needs a bullion bank

India’s affinity for gold is a well-known fact, so is its dependence on gold imports to meet the domestic demand. More than 98 percent of the gold consumed in the country is met through import, while the rest is met through recycled domestic gold. In 2015-16, India imported 926 tonnes of gold



Video

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook    Twitter    Google Plus    Linkedin    Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter