Farmers, poverty and growth - breathtaking contradictions of UPA2

The PM ends up contradicting better sense and expert committees' recommendations in his public policy posturing

kapil

Kapil Bajaj | September 9, 2010




The ongoing development debate, dominated by themes like Vedanta, acquisition of farmland for industry, and food security, deposits a thick layer of irony and contradiction on Prime Minister Manmohan Singh’s utterances at the September 6 meeting with a group of editors.

“India has no option but to industrialise. The only way we can raise our heads above poverty is for more people to be taken out of agriculture,” Singh was quoted by The Hindu as telling the editors.

Let’s juxtapose this wise-sounding statement with the recommendations of two committees set up by UPA-I whose agenda continues with UPA-II and defines a very important role for Manmohan Singh to perform. Both these committees dealt with the ‘unfinished agenda’ of land reforms and agrarian relations.

“As a general proposition it may be stated that land reform should remain an essential element of national agricultural and rural development strategies not only because land-based agricultural occupation must continue to provide livelihoods to a vast majority of rural population, but also because macro economic growth in most contexts has failed to create improved prospects for the rural poor to acquire assets, gain employment,” observed the working group on land relations (WGLR) for formulation of 11th Five Year Plan, set up in March 2006 by the Planning Commission.

“Large-scale conversion of agriculture land for non-agricultural purposes is threatening livelihoods of the people who heavily depend on agriculture. To add, inequitable distribution of benefits from the new land use, quantity of compensation not commensurating with the market value, and social trade-offs like rehabilitation not done properly are leading to immense dissatisfaction among the project affected people,” said the Committee on State Agrarian Relations and Unfinished Task of Land Reforms (CSARLR), chaired by the rural development minister, in its recommendations made public in September 2009.

The recommendations of CSARLR have since been considered by a committee of secretaries (CoS) in its four meetings. The CoS will pass them on, with its observations, to the National Council for Land Reforms (NCLR), which is chaired by Manmohan Singh and has several chief ministers as its members. The stated objective of the NCLR is to formulate a ‘national land reforms policy’ and possibly introduce a legislative bill.

The NCLR, which was set up by UPA-I in January 2008 along with the CSARLR, has not convened yet but continues to be “very much in existence,” a senior official of the ministry of rural development told Governance Now. It’s also interesting that CSARLR attributed its existence partly to the common minimum programme of the UPA-I that stated: ‘‘Landless families will be endowed with land through implementation of land ceiling and land redistribution legislation. No reversal of ceiling will be permitted.”

While the UPA-I, headed by Manmohan Sigh, resolved to carry out land reforms to keep even the landless in agriculture (and still does because land reforms agenda continues with UPA-II), Manmohan Singh of 2010 sees “no option but to industrialise” and wants “more people to be taken out of agriculture”.

It’s important to realize that both the committees mentioned above considered it axiomatic that agriculture is the only viable employment opportunity for the vast majority of Indians, including small, marginal and landless farmers, in the foreseeable future.

Both the committees pitched for strict imposition of land ceiling in rural areas (which goes against the grain of SEZ, contract farming and several other policies favoured by UPA government and which has, interestingly, been criticized by the Planning Commission recently), recommended strong measures against conversion of agricultural land to industrial land, expressed strong disapproval of the alienation of the tribal land, strict implementation of Panchayat (extension to scheduled areas) Act and empowerment of Gram Sabhas in matters of land acquisition.

The CSARLR has been scathing in its criticism of industrialization causing “rampant conversion” of farm land, which, in turn, is threatening food security. (View this also with the preoccupation of the National Advisory Council and the Supreme Court with food security and Manmohan’s exhortation to the apex court to stay away from the realm of policy formulation.)

The CSARLR even links the "macroeconomic policy regime since the early 1990s" with acceleration in loss of land from the vulnerable segments of the population and ‘extremist violence’ in 220 districts.

The two committees also recommended enfeebling or scrapping of the Land Acquisition Act 1894 to prevent the acquisition of farm land for any reason other than a strictly defined ‘public purpose’ and strict implementation of the resettlement and rehabilitation policy. The committees even recommended homestead rights for the poor or landless farmers (not re-skilling for the industry).

“The country will never be able to achieve a structural end to rural poverty without land reforms,” the CSARLR said.

Again, a beautiful contrast with Manmohan’s statement on September 6: ‘The only way we can raise our heads above poverty is for more people to be taken out of agriculture.’

Does Manmohan have any idea of what the country needs? Or is it the case that the country has failed to appreciate Manmohan’s wisdom and farsightedness?

Comments

 

Other News

India’s per capita power consumption likely to grow by two fold, says power minister

Singh said the power sector is witnessing an increased demand which is further expected to go up in the near future. The minister was addressing the Indian Power Stations 2019, an international operation and maintenance conference organised by NTPC .   Talking about the issues li

Net profit of Rs 616 crore posted by SAIL in Q3 of 2018-19

SAIL has managed to better its performance over the previous quarter as well by more than 11 percent when it stood at Rs 554 crore. The turnover for Q3 FY’19 improved by three percent over corresponding period of the last year (CPLY) and was Rs 15,660 crore vis-à-vis Rs 15,190 crore during Q3

The light turns amber

In a black salwar-suit and matching headscarf, Ruksana (name changed) listens carefully from a corner of the hall. Members of her support group are talking about their suffering, struggles, aspirations and achievements. At her turn, she slowly opens up. Like that of many others, her story is one of deceit,

Aero India 2019 kicks off in Bengaluru

Five day long Aero India -2019 organised by Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) was inaugurated at Air Force Station, Yelahanka, Bengaluru on Wednesday.   The French origin Rafale fighter jets are also participating in the event.   Asia’ largest

BHEL builds India’s first regenerative 5,000 HP electric locomotive

In a major technological breakthrough, BHEL has developed the country’s first such regenerative 5,000 horse power (HP) WAG-7 electric locomotive with a modern regeneration system for Indian Railways.   The electric loco was flagged-off by member traction, railway board, Gha

Prime Minister dedicates Rs 33,000 crore projects in Begusarai

Prime Minister Narendra Modi dedicated a host of developmental projects at Ulao airport in Begusarai, Bihar. Modi said these projects will fuel the progress of Bihar and the eastern states. He said that Bihar had the potential to play a pivotal role in driving the growth of the country. “The

Current Issue

Current Issue

Video

CM Nitish’s convoy attacked in Buxar

Opinion

Facebook    Twitter    Google Plus    Linkedin    Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter