Farmers, poverty and growth - breathtaking contradictions of UPA2

The PM ends up contradicting better sense and expert committees' recommendations in his public policy posturing

kapil

Kapil Bajaj | September 9, 2010




The ongoing development debate, dominated by themes like Vedanta, acquisition of farmland for industry, and food security, deposits a thick layer of irony and contradiction on Prime Minister Manmohan Singh’s utterances at the September 6 meeting with a group of editors.

“India has no option but to industrialise. The only way we can raise our heads above poverty is for more people to be taken out of agriculture,” Singh was quoted by The Hindu as telling the editors.

Let’s juxtapose this wise-sounding statement with the recommendations of two committees set up by UPA-I whose agenda continues with UPA-II and defines a very important role for Manmohan Singh to perform. Both these committees dealt with the ‘unfinished agenda’ of land reforms and agrarian relations.

“As a general proposition it may be stated that land reform should remain an essential element of national agricultural and rural development strategies not only because land-based agricultural occupation must continue to provide livelihoods to a vast majority of rural population, but also because macro economic growth in most contexts has failed to create improved prospects for the rural poor to acquire assets, gain employment,” observed the working group on land relations (WGLR) for formulation of 11th Five Year Plan, set up in March 2006 by the Planning Commission.

“Large-scale conversion of agriculture land for non-agricultural purposes is threatening livelihoods of the people who heavily depend on agriculture. To add, inequitable distribution of benefits from the new land use, quantity of compensation not commensurating with the market value, and social trade-offs like rehabilitation not done properly are leading to immense dissatisfaction among the project affected people,” said the Committee on State Agrarian Relations and Unfinished Task of Land Reforms (CSARLR), chaired by the rural development minister, in its recommendations made public in September 2009.

The recommendations of CSARLR have since been considered by a committee of secretaries (CoS) in its four meetings. The CoS will pass them on, with its observations, to the National Council for Land Reforms (NCLR), which is chaired by Manmohan Singh and has several chief ministers as its members. The stated objective of the NCLR is to formulate a ‘national land reforms policy’ and possibly introduce a legislative bill.

The NCLR, which was set up by UPA-I in January 2008 along with the CSARLR, has not convened yet but continues to be “very much in existence,” a senior official of the ministry of rural development told Governance Now. It’s also interesting that CSARLR attributed its existence partly to the common minimum programme of the UPA-I that stated: ‘‘Landless families will be endowed with land through implementation of land ceiling and land redistribution legislation. No reversal of ceiling will be permitted.”

While the UPA-I, headed by Manmohan Sigh, resolved to carry out land reforms to keep even the landless in agriculture (and still does because land reforms agenda continues with UPA-II), Manmohan Singh of 2010 sees “no option but to industrialise” and wants “more people to be taken out of agriculture”.

It’s important to realize that both the committees mentioned above considered it axiomatic that agriculture is the only viable employment opportunity for the vast majority of Indians, including small, marginal and landless farmers, in the foreseeable future.

Both the committees pitched for strict imposition of land ceiling in rural areas (which goes against the grain of SEZ, contract farming and several other policies favoured by UPA government and which has, interestingly, been criticized by the Planning Commission recently), recommended strong measures against conversion of agricultural land to industrial land, expressed strong disapproval of the alienation of the tribal land, strict implementation of Panchayat (extension to scheduled areas) Act and empowerment of Gram Sabhas in matters of land acquisition.

The CSARLR has been scathing in its criticism of industrialization causing “rampant conversion” of farm land, which, in turn, is threatening food security. (View this also with the preoccupation of the National Advisory Council and the Supreme Court with food security and Manmohan’s exhortation to the apex court to stay away from the realm of policy formulation.)

The CSARLR even links the "macroeconomic policy regime since the early 1990s" with acceleration in loss of land from the vulnerable segments of the population and ‘extremist violence’ in 220 districts.

The two committees also recommended enfeebling or scrapping of the Land Acquisition Act 1894 to prevent the acquisition of farm land for any reason other than a strictly defined ‘public purpose’ and strict implementation of the resettlement and rehabilitation policy. The committees even recommended homestead rights for the poor or landless farmers (not re-skilling for the industry).

“The country will never be able to achieve a structural end to rural poverty without land reforms,” the CSARLR said.

Again, a beautiful contrast with Manmohan’s statement on September 6: ‘The only way we can raise our heads above poverty is for more people to be taken out of agriculture.’

Does Manmohan have any idea of what the country needs? Or is it the case that the country has failed to appreciate Manmohan’s wisdom and farsightedness?

Comments

 

Other News

In free fall: Close to 1 lakh Covid-19 cases a day

India has been hitting upwards of 90,000 fresh cases of Covid-19 every day for some time now, as the virus continues to spread amid further Unlock. The recoveries, on the other hand, are also creating new records. The country recorded 96,424 new cases of infection – the highest single-

India has new record of recoveries – but new cases remain high too

India once again registered 90,000-plus fresh cases of Covid-19 in a day, even as the number of recoveries too registered a new high – 82,961. The number of those who have recovered so far is now nearly four times higher than the number of active cases. India continues to record a spat

“In financial sector, governance is the key”

The fall of financial institutions is largely a result of governance failures and company board members must ensure checks and balances for the larger ecosystem, says entrepreneur Shachindra Nath, executive chairman and managing director, U GRO Capital. In an webinar chat with Kailashnath Ad

More discussion in parliament beneficial for country: PM

As parliament on Monday commenced its special session amid the raging Covid-19 pandemic, prime minister Narendra Modi underlined the importance of debate in the house, saying that it is “beneficial” for the country. “Several important decisions will be taken in this session

`My Family, My Responsibility`: Mumbai campaign to spread Covid awareness

As coronavirus refuses to abate, Maharashtra has become the first state in India to cross 1 million mark in terms of confirmed cases and stares at shortage of medical oxygen. Every day 2,000-3,000 new patients require oxygen support across the state. Those in a critical condition need 40-60 litres of oxyge

Wait for more evidence before legalizing marijuana: Experts

Amid the trend in several countries of granting legal status to marijuana, a team of doctors from the Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, have called for more tests to find out its supposed benefits. “It would be prudent to wait for studies which prove beyond doubt the advantages of marijua

Governance Now Tech Masterclass State Governments

Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook    Twitter    Google Plus    Linkedin    Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter