Information Commissioners are opposed to proposed amendments
Danish Raza | February 2, 2010
The government may well be planning to amend the Right to Information Act. At least that is what Information Commissioner Shailesh Gandhi thinks.
Talking to Governance Now, Gandhi said he was getting "clear signals" that a plan is afoot though nobody is talking about it.
In fact, Gandhi has taken a step to counter this by making public minutes of the meeting the Department of Personnel and Training had held with all the information officers to discuss certain proposed amendments to the RTI in October 2009. These included keeping out "frivolous and vexatious" complaints and "discussions/consultations" (previously known as file notings) preceding a government decision.
In the October 2009 meeting, majority of the information officers opposed the amenments proposed by the government. Only two information commissioners had agreed on the need to exclude "frivolous and vexatious" complaints.
As a matter of routine, the minutes of this meeting should have been made public by DoPT by putting it on its website. But despite repeated reminders from Gandhi, it was not done so. Suspecting foul play, Gandhi took it upon himself to make the minutes public.
“From the minutes we know the views of the information commissioners. Now if the government brings the amendments, it will be doing so by overrule their views", said Gandhi.
Giving details of his effort to get the minutes public, Gandhi said eight days ago he had e-mailed the minutes to the DoPT secretary Shantanu Consul, asking him why the government was treating the meeting as a non- issue. Before this, he and fellow Information Commissioner Satyananda Mishra sent repeated reminders to the Department.
It may be noted that Consul had assured a delegation of the RTI activists last November that no amendments would be carried out without consulting them.
Following are the details of the October 2009 meeting Gandhi made public:
Minutes of the Consultative Meeting held by DOPT with Central and State Information Commissioners on 14 October 2009
DOPT had called a meeting for consultation with the Information Commissioners across the Country on 14 October 2009 on ways of strengthening the RTI Act. Around 60 Central and State Information Commissioners were present for this meeting.
Mr. Prithiviraj Chavan , Minister DOPT outlined the Government’s thinking that there was a need to strengthen the RTI Act by amending it. The papers circulated at the start of the meeting gave an idea of the amendments which the Government had in mind. Mr. Wajahat Habibullah Chief Information Commissioner who spoke next, very lucidly explained his view that there was no need to amend the RTI Act presently. After this the DOPT officers gave a point by point presentation of the amendments they were proposing to the Commissioners. They outlined seven amendments. The Information Commissioners almost unanimously pointed out that the first five points needed no amendments. The seven proposals had five which needed no amendments and two which would dilute the RTI Act and would need an amendment to the Act :
The two proposals which needed an amendment to the Act proposed by DOPT:
This would result in large-scale rejections by PIOs and would go against the present principle that no purpose needs to be given by applicants. Most Commissioners spoke against such an amendment, while two stated that it was necessary.
All the Information Commissioners who spoke gave their verdict that for the first five objectives there was no need to amend the RTI Act. On point 6 two Commissioners spoke in favour of amending the Act to prevent frivolous and vexatious RTI queries, whereas over half a dozen opposed these. On point 7 also the Commissioners expressed a clear view that no amendment was desirable. Some Commissioners pointed out that any change in the RTI Act would lead to unnecessary confusion in implementation and the minds of Citizens and PIOs.
The Information Commissioners had almost unanimously given their clear and unequivocal stand, that no amendments were necessary to the RTI Act.
How many times a day do you flush the toilet? This number is probably between five and eight times for an average person. How many times a day do you spare a thought towards what happens to the human waste after you flush it away? The answer to this is likely to be close to zero for most people.
Hailing from Satara district of Maharashtra, Eknath Sambhaji Shinde had to leave his education midway to financially support his family. He worked as an auto rickshaw driver, a lorry driver and also said to have worked in a brewery before he came in contact with Anand Dighe, Shiv Sena’s Thane unit pr
Former Maharashtra chief minister Davendra Fadnavis stunned all at a press conference Thursday and named Eknath Shinde, the rebel MLA from Shiv Sena, as the next chief minister. Though Fadnavis said he would stay out of the government, a few hours later the BJP leadership announced he would be the deputy c
Minutes after the Supreme Court ordered a floor test on Wednesday night, Uddhav Thackeray in a televised address resigned as the chief minister of Maharashtra and also as a member of legislative council (MLC). He later drove down to Raj Bhavan and tendered his resignation to the governor Bhagat Singh Koshi
The gig economy has arrived in India, as the Covid-19 pandemic has propelled a flexibility of employment. As many as 77 lakh workers were engaged in the gig economy, constituting 2.6% of the non-agricultural workforce or 1.5% of the total workforce in India. The gig workforce is expected to expand to 2.35
From obtaining an electricity connection to a driver`s licence, ration card, or old-age allowance, delivery of government schemes and services is an aspect of governance that impacts citizens at various points throughout their lives. The Haryana state government provides over 600 such schemes and services.