Unconditional bail for Sonia and Rahul in National Herald case

Next hearing on Feb 20, no exemption sought from personal appearance

GN Bureau | December 19, 2015




The Patiala House court on Saturday granted unconditional bail on a personal bond of Rs 50,000 each to Congress president Sonia Gandhi and her son Rahul. Then the court in New Delhi posted the hearing of   high-profile National Herald case for February 20.

Former prime minister Manmohan Singh filed the bail bond on behalf of Sonia and for Rahul’s bail his sister Priyanka Vadra did the needful.

The heavily secure Patiala House court saw virtually the entire Congress leadership attending the proceedings in solidarity and make a huge political statement.

Hundreds of Congress workers raised slogans against the BJP and the government as the party leaders walked inside.

Congress lawyer Kapil Sibal said “the Gandhis have not asked for future exemptions from court appearance.”

Sibal said complainant Subramanian Swamy opposed the bail, requesting for some conditions to be set. Swamy suggested that the passports of the accused should be impounded but the court ignored his request. Congress lawyer Abhishek Manu Singhvi added: “It is sad that Swamy had asked for such a condition against people who are such prominent personalities. We are thankful that the court rejected Swamy’s request.”

The relief to the top Congress leadership came at the end of a feverish Saturday, which saw the party and the BJP trade charges against each other. While the Congress alleged "vendetta" and called Swamy prime minister Narendra Modi's "mask", Swamy dismissed the attack as another Congress "drama".

In 2012, Swamy had filed the case accusing Sonia, Rahul and the others - Motilal Vora, Oscar Fernandes, Suman Dubey and Sam Pitroda - of cheating and misappropriation of funds in acquiring the ownership of now-defunct daily, National Herald.

The National Herald newspaper, founded by Jawaharlal Nehru, was closely associated with India's freedom struggle and the Indian National Congress until 2008. On April 1, 2008, the paper's editorial announced that it was temporarily suspending its operations.

Before its closure, the paper was run by Associated Journals Limited (AJL). In 2009, Sonia ordered the closure of the defunct paper.

On June 26 last year, a trial court issued summons to the Congress leaders on Swamy's complaint about "cheating" in the acquisition of AJL by Young India Limited, a firm in which Sonia and Rahul each own a 38 per cent stake.

The two leaders then approached the Delhi high court seeking a stay. On Monday this week, the high court refused to stay the summons, and asked all of the accused to appear for a hearing on Saturday.

Comments

 

Other News

Ram Nath Kovind to be India’s next president

 India’s 14th president is going to be former Bihar governor Ram Nath Kovind, a dalit. He triumphed over former Lok Sabha speaker Meira Kumar in the vote count that took place on Thursday.   Kovind succeeds Pranab Mukherjee, who demits office on July 25. He becomes the

At JNU, all that is beautiful and “solid has melted into the air”…

Dear “Professor” Vice Chancellor,    When the clamour is made all around us, and rightly so, about the condition of growing degeneration of quality education in the higher institutions of learning in our country, you have justly – for which you must be

Making words count

In 2016, 38 bills were enacted in parliament. During that year, on average, the time spent on legislative debate (without interruptions) was 23 percent in the Lok Sabha and 16 percent in the Rajya Sabha (calculated from the PRS Legislative Research data).  Time is, however, just one measure

Business goes north

Tyre manufacturer MRF (originally Madras Rubber Factory), which enjoys instant brand recall thanks to the presence of its logo on cricket superstar Virat Kohli’s bat, figures among the most prominent industries in Tamil Nadu. But the state does not figure in its future plans. Like another TN industry

Do you think the Central Water Commission needs to take on the responsibility of irrigation governance?

Do you think the Central Water Commission needs to take on the responsibility of irrigation governance?

Debating the idea of privacy

Is right to privacy a fundamental right? The Supreme Court on Wednesday heard arguments on the contentious issue linked to the Aadhaar debate. Here`s how the issue has been addressed by different countries, with the first reference dating to 1890.   The Supreme Court on Tuesday s





Video

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook    Twitter    Google Plus    Linkedin    Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter