Child rights violations on rise in UP

UP is also violating Protection of Child Rights Act by not setting up a state commission

Adwait Vikram Singh | September 29, 2012



Complacence to realisation, Uttar Pradesh’s socialist government’s great leap forward in child rights falls short. Uttar Pradesh is the largest state with more than 200,000,000 inhabitants and the second highest GDP in the country. If a nation it would most certainly be the fifth most populated country in the world. It would be imperative to say that such strong statehood entails a degree of complacence in the authorities on vital issues.

Here ‘child rights’ has been a neglected issue for the last two decades, where the state government was represented by almost every relevant political party across the spectrum. The state currently ranks 18th in child rights in the country and 27th in healthcare next only to Jharkhand.

National Commission for Protection of Child Rights (NCPCR) on October 8, 2011 said that 50,000 lives have been lost in the last three decades as the public health system has failed in the eastern part of the state.

In a recent study of the Planning Commission, ‘Working Group for Social inclusion of Vulnerable Group like Child Labour and Bonded and Migrant Labour in the 12th Five Year Plan (2012-17,)’ the commission notes its findings that the share of Uttar Pradesh in child labour has dramatically shot up in the last one decade from 12.5 percent in the mid-1990s to 15.2 percent in 2001 to close to 23 per cent in 2004-05, which is a cause for concern.

Andhra Pradesh had highest number of child labour population in the country in 1991 and it has taken commendable steps to eradicate it. After the enforcement of Child Labour Act as on January 7, 2010, Andhra Pradesh conducted 2,89,275 inspections while Uttar Pradesh conducted only 24,399, which was lesser than Delhi (31,460), Uttarakhand (44,631), Nagaland (30,365) and others. Andhra Pradesh under the same inspection found 1,50,244 violations, prosecuted 52,836 people, and was successful in getting 17,279 convictions, being the largest in the country.

While Uttar Pradesh found 16,303 violations, it prosecuted only 7,569 people and was successful in getting only 405 convictions.

The Parliament had enacted the Commission for Protection of Child Rights, 2005, which under Section 17 requires every state to have a State Commission for Protection of Child Rights. The Commission would have wide powers to settle and safeguard the rights of children. The commission can also take suo motu on certain occasions of violations against children. The Act is a great leap forward for safeguard of the rights of the children but after several reminders from the central government, National Commission for Protection of Child Rights, the government of India and many child rights activists and organisations Uttar Pradesh has taken no action.

Almost all major states have constituted such a commission, like Bihar (2008), Delhi (2007), Jharkhand (rules notified on 2011), Assam (2010), Orrisa (2009), Rajasthan (2010), Uttarakhand (2011), Madhya Pradesh (2009), Maharashtra (2009) and other states.

Thus to begin its journey from complacence to realisation, the state should first notify rules and institute the ‘Uttar Pradesh Commission for Protection of Child Rights’ by the end of 2012. This is extremely necessary and vital as with every passing day crime and exploitation against children in the state is increasing and an effective and fairly autonomous institution is necessary to safeguard the rights of children.  

Comments

 

Other News

How Rafi, Raj Kapoor helped pave the way for a great uranium deal

There`s a certain moment in diplomacy that`s too personal to be captured in a communiqué, too small to make the front page, but more revealing than the front page. This week, prime minister Narendra Modi reached Tashkent and, amid the pomp of state visits, managed to evoke the old Bollywood tunes

Distinguishing Fish 1 and Fish 2: The pragmatism behind India’s WTO ratification

 India became the 123rd WTO member to ratify the multilateral Agreement on Fisheries subsidies (AoFS) when it deposited the Instrument of Acceptance for Phase 1 on July 20, 2026. The ratification is restricted to disciplining Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated fishing (IUU), protection for overfished

The 7% growth problem: Why the next 7% will be harder

India has become accustomed to hearing the 7% growth number. It is now less a milestone than an expectation. Yet the paradox is becoming clearer: maintaining 7% growth may be considerably harder than achieving it once. India’s real GDP grew 7.7% in FY2025–26, following growth of 6.5% in FY202

The Constitution cannot be altered: Justice Abhay Oka

Justice Abhay Oka, who retired from the Supreme Court in May 2025, has said that the Constitution of India cannot be altered. Explaining the landmark Kesavananda Bharati judgment (1973) on the basic structure of the Constitution, he said, “This is one judgment that has saved democracy in India.&rdq

How the flora and fauna evolved in the Indian subcontinent

Mammals of India  By A.J.T. Johnsingh and P.O. Nameer HarperCollins India in association with Bombay Natural History Society  

India`s renewable race is moving beyond megawatts

When Shell bought Sprng Energy in 2022, India`s renewable energy market appeared to offer precisely what global energy majors were seeking: scale, growth and a place in one of the world`s largest energy transitions. Four years later, Shell is selling the same business to Aditya Birla Group for an enterpris

Upcoming Conferences



-->

Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter