Planning Commission rebuffs 'armchair advisor' tag

PTI | July 12, 2010



Planning Commission deputy chairman Montek Singh Ahluwalia on Sunday said a government cannot be run only by those who know how to build roads, rebuffing transport minister Kamal Nath's charge that the plan panel was an "armchair advisor".

"My view is that you cannot run a government only with people who know how to build roads. You have to give them a set of rules..." Ahluwalia told CNN-IBN.

Nath had hit out at the Planning Commission on July 5, describing it as an "armchair" advisor oblivious to the ground realities of building roads.

"Producing a book is one thing and producing a road is another thing," he had said at a Planning Commission programme.

While Ahluwalia agreed that "building roads is certainly different from writing guidelines," he said, "we are not an implementing body. Equally, it does not mean that you (ministries) don't need advise. I mean accountants are not people who build roads but you cannot build roads without having decent accounts."

He said that different arms of the government play different roles.

Ahluwalia also rebutted Nath's charges that the plan panel was not allowing his ministry to achieve the 20 km-a-day road-building target.

"I don't think that is at all correct," Ahluwalia said, adding that when targets are set, "you have to relate that target to the funding that is available."

One of the principal roles of the Planning Commission is to scale down the demands of ministries, which are typically 100 per cent more than the money available, he said.

On Nath's remarks that the world class terminal at Delhi airport would not have been possible, had the Planning Commission been involved in it, Ahluwalia said the plan panel had a role, but was limited to selection of the operator (GMR Group).

"It was a public-private-partnership and the government's involvement was prior to the selection of the partner. It is absolutely true that once selected we didn't get involved.
 

Comments

 

Other News

Why you should vote

What are the direct tangible benefits that you want from the government coming in power? The manifestos of various parties set a host of agendas which many times falls back in materialising the intended gains. Governance failures, policy lapses, implementation gaps, leadership crisis and cultural blockages

How the role of Ayurveda evolved pre- and post-independence

Ayurveda, Nation and Society: United Provinces, c. 1890–1950 By Saurav Kumar Rai Orient BlackSwan, 292 pages, Rs 1,400  

General Elections: Phase 4 voting on in 96 seats

As many as 17.7 crore electors are eligible to vote in the fourth phase of general elections taking place on Monday in 10 states/UTs. 175 Legislative Assembly seats of Andhra Pradesh and 28 Legislative Assembly seats of Odisha are also going to polls in this phase. Polling time in select as

Is it advantage India in higher education?

Harvard, Oxford and Cambridge: The Past, Present and Future of Excellence in Education By Rajesh Talwar Bridging Borders, 264 pages

Elections ’24: Candidates discuss city issues at Mumbai Debate

With the financial capital of India readying to go for Lok Sabha polls in the fifth phase on May 20, a debate with the candidates was organised jointly by the Free Press Journal, Mumbai Press Club, Praja Foundation and the Indian Merchants` Chamber here on Wednesday. The candidates engaged with the audienc

What Prakash Singh feels about the struggle for police reforms

Unforgettable Chapters: Memoirs of a Top Cop By Prakash Singh Rupa Publications, Rs 395, 208pages Prakash Singh

Visionary Talk: Amitabh Gupta, Pune Police Commissioner with Kailashnath Adhikari, MD, Governance Now


Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter