Pratap Vikram Singh | January 7, 2014
The election commission of India (ECI) may not sign an arrangement with Google which proposed to offer cloud services for facilitating online voter registration and directions to polling stations, according to a senior government official aware of the communications between the two agencies.
According to a senior ECI official, the internet giant has only made a presentation to the commission on Monday and the decision to commission the project is yet to be taken by the organisation.
Contrary to the story published by The Times of India which had claimed that the two organisations had signed an agreement but the deal is yet to be made public, sources at the ECI disclosed that unlike what has been reported, no deal has yet been signed with Google and the commission will be taking the final decision only on Tuesday.
The story in the newspaper had earlier attracted criticism from a section of cyber security professionals, who had accused the commission of compromising privacy of Indian voters by sharing data with Google. The US based internet giant, in the past, has been exposed of helping the NSA to snoop on several countries including India, as revealed by whistle blower Edward Snowden, who had worked with the agency.
Even Congress and the BJP on Monday have been reported to have registered concerns with the commission, hoping the deal may not affect “electoral process and national security”.
Giving details of what has transpired between the ECI and Google, a senior ECI official on condition of anonymity, informed that the company (Google) had earlier approached the commission showing interest in helping out the commission with building a web application for facilitation of services offered through the commission’s portal www.eci.nic.in.
As part of the process to understand the scope of work and the functionalities better, the commission had provided “dummy data” on the request of Google to build the proposed application and then make a presentation. A non-discloser agreement was also signed between the two organisations.
Based on the inputs and the data provided by the ECI, the internet giant on Monday made a presentation to the commission. However, the official pointed out that under pressure from political parties and civil societies, the ECI is likely to drop the idea of tying up with Google for the project on Tuesday.
Google had proposed to provide a separate web page which would make electoral roll data—name, address and location of polling stations—searchable. What this mean was that if an applicant wanted to register for voter ID card, the website would take the details and pass it on to the commission. The search facility was also aimed at providing directions to the polling station.
Critics, however, point out that if the registration is facilitated through Google, the company will be able to access voter information like the mobile number, email ID, demographic details and the IP number. This is very well possible since online registration or even online correction on the commission’s website requires one to to enter email ID and mobile number.
“This data will be a gold mine of intelligence for them. If EC transfers data to Google this will be a conscious data breech by a constitutional body,” Jiten Jain, member, InfoSec Consortium told a gathering of reporter at a conference to raise “alarm” over the “agreement” on Saturday.
Jain said that Google will use all this data to profile voters. "It can be used for targeted political advertisements and could be used to manipulate, manufacture and affect public opinion of the electorate,” Jain told reporters.
The senior official strongly disapproves of the two charges made by the cyber professionals. The search engine offered a cloud storage wherein the commission would have the full authority to store, retain and delete data, without the inter-mediation of Google, says the senior official.
The official says the page proposed to be created by Google would have been owned by the commission. The commission had plans to ask the company to build the web page in open source, which would be open for audit by a government accredited agency.
After auditing of entire code, which would ensure there is no tracking software on the web page, there is no way the company could collect any other user data. Usually to collect data about the internet activity of users websites have cookies- a tool which gets automatically downloaded on users’ computer as the webpage is opened.
“Taking these measures there is no way a user could be profiled,” says the official.
Besides, internet is just another medium for availing services from the commission, says the official. If one doesn’t want to share their mobile number and email ID, they can simply go and stand in a queue at electoral office and get things done. In the manual process sharing contact details is not mandatory.
"Sanitation is more important than independence". --Mahatma Gandhi The world is moving towards global transformation and sanitation is an important aspect in the development of any country. The United Nations (UN) has observed in 2015-16 that 19.7%
Legendary film star and politician Shatrughan Sinha has said that friendship in Bollywood is limited to onscreen, and there is no unity and some news channels are taking advantage of this situation. “Groups within the industry or their supporters may sometimes come together for some c
In India, only 2.40 million out of an estimated 2.64 million cases of tuberculosis were reported to the government, that is, 2,40,000 TB patients went unreported, in 2019, according to the WHO Global Tuberculosis Report 2020. The reporting of TB cases, however, has significantly increased ov
Fifteen years back, the Right To Information (RTI) Act became operational on October 12, 2005. It was the auspicious day of Vijayadashmi. It appeared to herald a new evolution in Indian democracy. Citizens who had been advocating this law saw an opportunity of converting India’s defective elective de
As Maharashtra governor Bhagat Singh Koshyari went sarcastic and wrote to chief minister Uddhav Thackeray, asking him if he had turned ‘secular’ – an epithet he hated, as the places of worship remain closed amid the Covid-19 pandemic; the Shiv Sena chief replied he did not need certificat
When it was launched on October 12, 2005, the Right to Information Act ushered in a revolution, empowering common citizens to ask questions on a range of government activities and seek accountability. Over the years, they – especially a new breed of activists – made good use of the new law, to