Why Virat Kohli, Priyanka Chopra should not quit as brand ambassadors

In the alleged PNB-Nirav Modi scam, they have not led anybody into trouble

GN Bureau | February 22, 2018


#Priyanka Chopra   #Mahendra Singh Dhoni   #Virat Kohli   #Banking   #Punjab National Bank   #Nirav Modi   #Amrapali  
Virat Kohli (Photo Courtesy: Twitter)
Virat Kohli (Photo Courtesy: Twitter)

After becoming the brand ambassador for Punjab National Bank in 2016, cricket star Virat Kohli has appeared in advertisements promoting a variety of loans. Now that PNB is in deep soup over an alleged Rs 11,400 crore scandal, Kohli is expected to end his contract with the bank. That may not be fair.

 
The same argument holds for film stars Priyanka Chopra and Siddharth Malhotra, who have appeared in the advertisements for jeweler-businessman Nirav Modi who is alleged to have perpetrated the fraud.
 
In April 2016, Kohli’s senior, MS Dhoni, had to step down as brand ambassador for Amrapali builders, after the residents of the real-estate firm’s Noida project took to the social media to air their complaints.
 
Apparently, prime minister Narendra Modi proposes to bring in a new law to fix liability of brand ambassadors in such cases, as celebrity faces do influence consumers’ choices. The proposed law will of course have to take care of the nuances of liabilities.
 
However, before asking Kohli, Chopra or Dhoni to end their ties with some firm that is facing allegations of wrongdoing, Twitterati should pause and consider what, if anything, is it that they have done wrong.
 
When Kohli, for example, became the brand ambassador of PNB, a press statement from the bank quoted him as saying that “PNB is Mera Apna Bank” as, the statement adds, “he is an account holder of the Bank since the age of 16 years.” In that case, in fact, he himself might be in the same plight as other PNB accountholders! Come to think of it, naming PNB as “my preferred banker” and nudging a loan aspirant to a nearby PNB bank involve no liability – no fraud has been perpetrated on the bank’s accountholders and loan-takers.
 
In other words, the financial scandal – involving misuse of some LoUs that have gone unpaid for long – has nothing whatever to do with the area Kohli and Chopra are dealing in. Unlike Dhoni, who might have influenced a home-buyer’s decision to buy an Amrapali property and thus (it can be argued) directly led to their later troubles; Kohli and Chopra have not put anybody in trouble by their endorsements.
 
The basic philosophy of consumer protection sometimes seems to be that ‘the consumer is gullible and needs to be protected from any and every potentially misleading claims’. Well, the consumer is no more gullible than the poor: she is the same person who buys Geetanjali jewelry and goes to vote too.

Comments

 

Other News

Five ways to realise the potential of India’s handicraft and handloom sector

India`s economic ambitions are increasingly defined by the industries of the future. Semiconductors, electronics, artificial intelligence and advanced manufacturing dominate policy conversations. Yet one of India`s largest employment-intensive sectors continues to occupy a surprisingly marginal place in ec

Beyond toilets: Why open defecation persists in rural India

Despite the awareness campaigns on sanitation across India, open defecation (OD) is practised openly and widely in both rural and urban areas. Research shows that rural respondents are well aware of the negative impacts of OD, yet this awareness does not lead to toilet construction or use. In rural North I

What unpaid nation builders want from policymakers

The Supreme Court recently described homemakers as “nation builders” and fixed a notional monthly income of Rs 30,000 for them in motor accident compensation cases. The judgment was not about wages. It was about compensation. Yet it inadvertently raised a larger economic question: If a homemake

What the US–Iran peace deal means for India

After months of rising tensions, the United States and Iran have reached a memorandum of understanding called the "Islamabad Agreement." This agreement allows for the immediate reopening of the Strait of Hormuz without tolls and provides Iran with relief from sanctions, depending on its complianc

V. M. Tarkunde: A legal luminary par excellence

14 Lawyers: Portraits from The Bar By Raju Ramachandran  Juggernaut, 248 pages, Rs. 799  

The Cost of Obesity

The latest episode of Checks and Balances focuses on the ticking time bomb of obesity in India, and Geetanjali Minhas of Governance Now spoke with a panel of experts. You can watch the episode here: https://youtu.be/mH





Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter