The black money issue is a good opportunity for a correction in the way we take our stand on national issues
Deevakar Anand | October 18, 2014
What’s so auspicious about October 17, 2014 that the Narendra Modi government decided to go to the supreme court and filed an application stating that names of people with black money in foreign bank accounts cannot be revealed due to restrictions under the double taxation avoidance agreement (DTAA)?
It’s not as if the government, its ministers and mandarins, woke up yesterday and learnt about it. For this is precisely what the previous UPA government had said all along: that, and I repeat, the names cannot be revealed due to restrictions under DTAA.
But as the saying goes,, every cloud has its silver lining, and this, too, has one: that the political discourse has to improve. Vastly. It is also a good (un)learning opportunity– stop hooting for the heck of it. And stop opposing only because you are in the opposition.
That DTAA stops the government from revealing names of the account holders in Liechtenstein, the tiny tax-haven nation in central Europe, may or may not find merit in law, and that is for the court to decide (the three judge-bench headed by chief justice HL Dattu will hear the matter on October 28). But the issue reflects badly on the BJP, known to be a more organised party with research wings than the Congress. For, only the other month the party, and then PM candidate Modi, was in the middle of a high-pitched contention, holding the Manmohan Singh administration responsible for its failure to get black money from abroad.
But suddenly it appears all governments speak the same language – for good or bad. As a people, we like to discuss, propose, and oppose issues of national importance in ways which are anything but well-meaning.
One can be reasonably certain that all this noise about black money, and the Modi government’s purported U-turn on the issue, would drown out by Sunday. Instead, the talking heads would move on to the next topic as results of the Haryana and Maharashtra elections come out.
In fact, it’s only a matter of how soon the TV channels and the Twitterati can get hold of a more ‘exciting’ issue to play up. In that case, let me take a wild guess: by late this evening itself discussion on black money would be on the backburner.
What is more significant, and worrisome, as many would say, finance minister Arun Jaitley, who when in opposition had cried hoarse over the UPA’s ‘inability’ to act on black money, told us yesterday that the UPA is to be blamed for getting us in this DTAA soup in 1995. So what does Jaitley want us to believe? That he searched for the information on Google only yesterday? That he didn’t know of it earlier when he was criticising the UPA?
The black money issue is a good opportunity for a correction in the way we take our stands on national issues. Instead of playing to the gallery and indulging in politics of convenience, we should take a more well-meaning approach in dealing with national problems.
This is also why an opposition party should sometimes allow one of its members to appreciate good work of the government and still retain him. Let there not be more Shashi Tharoors who get fired as party spokespersons. For, spokespersons in opposition parties are not meant only to oppose, and change tack when the governing dispensation changes.
The Narendra Modi government has set aside Rs 52,393 crore in 2017-18 for the welfare of the dalits. On the face of it, the amount is substantial. However, an analysis of the past actual allocation shows that there has in fact been a dip in spending on schemes that are specifically meant only for dalits.
“I will always try and it is also my belief that the president’s post should be above politics,” said NDA’s presidential candidate Ram Nath Kovind who filed the nomination papers on Friday. “Since the time I became governor, I am no longe
A lot of debate that we witness in the media on the cattle question these days suffer from the disease of speculative utopian imagination of a ‘cow-nation’ and relentless abuses for those beef-eating ‘others’. Political debates over the question of o
Ramin Jahanbegloo is a renowned philosopher who is now associated with the Jindal Global University. His latest work, The Decline of Civilization, calls for countering the ‘decivilising’ tendencies of our times by returning to Gandhi and Tagore. Jahanbegloo answered s
Should CBSE prepone the board exams?
In this nationalistic age, sports seem to play an important role, and in India, this can be seen during cricket matches. For most, a victory symbolises prestige and supremacy. On Sunday, India lost to Pakistan in the final match of the ICC Champions Trophy. The defea