When algorithms decide and children die -Governance Now

When algorithms decide and children die

The case for governing AI in warfare

Neera Bali | April 22, 2026

#Technology #Conflict #AI

The scene after the attack on the Shajareh Tayyebeh school in Minab, Iran, on February 28. (Photo: Courtesy Mehr News Agency via WikiMedia/Creative Commons)

The images have not left me, of dead and wounded children being carried in the arms of the medics and relatives to the ambulances and hospitals. On February 28, at the start of Operation Epic Fury, cruise missiles struck the Shajareh Tayyebeh school – officially named a girls’ school, in Minab, southern Iran, hitting the building multiple times. Iranian authorities reported that 168 people killed – mostly school children, aged between seven and twelve – along with 26 teachers and four parents. Ninety-five more were wounded. These children had woken up that Tuesday morning, been sent to school by mothers who believed the classroom was the safest place outside their homes, but they were dead before the day was over. UNESCO condemned the strike as a "grave violation of humanitarian law". The attack has been cited as one of the deadliest single civilian casualty incidents in the conflict.

Preliminary findings suggest that the school was struck because it was listed as a military target database that had never been updated. The compound had once been part of an Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps facility, but military personnel had moved out years earlier and school restarted. But the data did not reflect this. No one verified it before the missiles were fired.

Who is responsible? The programmer who built the system? The intelligence analysts who allowed the database to go unverified? The commanders who authorised the strike? Possibly all of them – but the diffusion of responsibility and accountability across this chain is precisely what makes AI-assisted targeting so dangerous and catastrophic. The distinction between military targets and civilian objects needs to be clearly defined and verified.

In any conventional targeting chain, an error of this magnitude would generate a trail of accountability, but algorithms cannot be held in contempt, sentenced, or court-martialled. The Minab school attack is evidence, at scale, that existing law is not sufficient when there is no human in the loop to verify and apply it.

The governance gap is real and closeable. Legal framework is essential; for example, mandatory human verification – with documented authorisation and a timestamp – before any AI-assisted targeting system can direct a strike on a location. No algorithm should be able to carry a target from identification to authorisation without a named human officer confirming, against current intelligence, that the target is what the system says it is.

Second, mandatory, time-stamped expiry on targeting intelligence data: any classification of a building as a military facility must lapse after a defined period and require re-verification before it can be actioned. The Minab school was a preventable catastrophe on both counts.

The children who arrived at school in Minab on the morning of 28th February, did not know that a database somewhere had not been updated. They only knew that it was a Tuesday, that school was safe, and they were happy to be there. The many drawings and sketches from the bombed site are heart wrenching to look at. The question is no longer whether we understand the problem, it is whether the people who have the authority to fix it, have the will to act, before the next school is in the database.

Neera Bali is Chief of Staff, Pahle India Foundation.

Comments

Other News

How Rafi, Raj Kapoor helped pave the way for a great uranium deal

There`s a certain moment in diplomacy that`s too personal to be captured in a communiqué, too small to make the front page, but more revealing than the front page. This week, prime minister Narendra Modi reached Tashkent and, amid the pomp of state visits, managed to evoke the old Bollywood tunes

Distinguishing Fish 1 and Fish 2: The pragmatism behind India’s WTO ratification

India became the 123rd WTO member to ratify the multilateral Agreement on Fisheries subsidies (AoFS) when it deposited the Instrument of Acceptance for Phase 1 on July 20, 2026. The ratification is restricted to disciplining Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated fishing (IUU), protection for overfished

The 7% growth problem: Why the next 7% will be harder

India has become accustomed to hearing the 7% growth number. It is now less a milestone than an expectation. Yet the paradox is becoming clearer: maintaining 7% growth may be considerably harder than achieving it once. India’s real GDP grew 7.7% in FY2025–26, following growth of 6.5% in FY202

The Constitution cannot be altered: Justice Abhay Oka

Justice Abhay Oka, who retired from the Supreme Court in May 2025, has said that the Constitution of India cannot be altered. Explaining the landmark Kesavananda Bharati judgment (1973) on the basic structure of the Constitution, he said, “This is one judgment that has saved democracy in India.&rdq

How the flora and fauna evolved in the Indian subcontinent

Mammals of India By A.J.T. Johnsingh and P.O. Nameer HarperCollins India in association with Bombay Natural History Society

India`s renewable race is moving beyond megawatts

When Shell bought Sprng Energy in 2022, India`s renewable energy market appeared to offer precisely what global energy majors were seeking: scale, growth and a place in one of the world`s largest energy transitions. Four years later, Shell is selling the same business to Aditya Birla Group for an enterpris