Should beggars be sent back to their state of origin?

GN Bureau | February 20, 2010



It is a weird thing to do. For the Delhi government to ask 10 state governments to take back the beggars, that is. The logic being these beggars came from those states. How does the Delhi government know? It actually carried out a survey to find out how many beggars came from which states. And on the basis of this survey, the Delhi government wrote to chief secretaries of 10 state governments. Like a typical bureaucrat, West Bengal chief secretary even wrote back asking for details of the beggars and what needed to be done. But then, he is the only one responded.

Equally weird is the purpose behind the move. The Delhi government wants to present a better image of the city at the time of the Commonwealth Games it is hosting in the later part of this year. You see, we have to clean our city so that the foreign tourists, sports persons and officials who would be visiting us won't see our dirty beggars.

Ours is a free country. Anyone living in any part of the country can work and live in any other part of the country. That is what Bal Thackerays of the world are told everytime north Indians are attacked by them in Mumbai. Doesn't this apply to the beggars? Don't they have claim to equality and right to livelihood that our constitution guarantees? Can't really beggars be choosers?

More seriously, hasn't the Delhi government banned begging on the streets? What happened to beggars' homes the city is supposed to be running? What happened to the plan of rehabilitating those found begging on the street? What happend to the tax payers' money earmarked for this purpose? Will the Delhi government please explain?



 

Comments

 

Other News

How Rafi, Raj Kapoor helped pave the way for a great uranium deal

There`s a certain moment in diplomacy that`s too personal to be captured in a communiqué, too small to make the front page, but more revealing than the front page. This week, prime minister Narendra Modi reached Tashkent and, amid the pomp of state visits, managed to evoke the old Bollywood tunes

Distinguishing Fish 1 and Fish 2: The pragmatism behind India’s WTO ratification

 India became the 123rd WTO member to ratify the multilateral Agreement on Fisheries subsidies (AoFS) when it deposited the Instrument of Acceptance for Phase 1 on July 20, 2026. The ratification is restricted to disciplining Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated fishing (IUU), protection for overfished

The 7% growth problem: Why the next 7% will be harder

India has become accustomed to hearing the 7% growth number. It is now less a milestone than an expectation. Yet the paradox is becoming clearer: maintaining 7% growth may be considerably harder than achieving it once. India’s real GDP grew 7.7% in FY2025–26, following growth of 6.5% in FY202

The Constitution cannot be altered: Justice Abhay Oka

Justice Abhay Oka, who retired from the Supreme Court in May 2025, has said that the Constitution of India cannot be altered. Explaining the landmark Kesavananda Bharati judgment (1973) on the basic structure of the Constitution, he said, “This is one judgment that has saved democracy in India.&rdq

How the flora and fauna evolved in the Indian subcontinent

Mammals of India  By A.J.T. Johnsingh and P.O. Nameer HarperCollins India in association with Bombay Natural History Society  

India`s renewable race is moving beyond megawatts

When Shell bought Sprng Energy in 2022, India`s renewable energy market appeared to offer precisely what global energy majors were seeking: scale, growth and a place in one of the world`s largest energy transitions. Four years later, Shell is selling the same business to Aditya Birla Group for an enterpris

Upcoming Conferences



-->

Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter