Will the Nuke Bill sell us cheaper than Bhopal?

GN Bureau | June 8, 2010



Much is being made out of $ 470 million that the Union Carbide paid as compensation for the Bhopal gas tragedy of 1984 that killed at least 15,000 people and caused grievous injury to over 500,000 others. It is being pointed out that this compensation amount means a paltry sum of Rs 12,410 to each victim.

But that was in 1999, when the compensation amount was decided in an out-of-court settlement. At the current exchange rate (Rs 46.90 to an US dollar), $ 470 million would mean a cool Rs 2,206 crore—that is a hell of a lot more (more than four times actually)  than what our government has fixed in the case of a nuclear disaster.

That’s right. The Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage Bill of 2010, which the Manmohan Singh government surreptitiously introduced in Lok Sabha on the last day of the last budget session, fixes the maximum amount of liability for the operator of a nuclear plant in case of a disaster at Rs.500 crore!
If the successive state and central governments failed the victims of the Bhopal gas tragedy and sold them cheap, our present government intends to sell us even cheaper in the case of a nuclear disaster.

Shouldn’t Law Minister Veerappa Moily be focusing on ridiculously low amount of liability fixed in the nuke bill, rather than going around giving sound bytes to television channels how justice was “buried” in the Bhopal case?
 

 

Comments

 

Other News

How Rafi, Raj Kapoor helped pave the way for a great uranium deal

There`s a certain moment in diplomacy that`s too personal to be captured in a communiqué, too small to make the front page, but more revealing than the front page. This week, prime minister Narendra Modi reached Tashkent and, amid the pomp of state visits, managed to evoke the old Bollywood tunes

Distinguishing Fish 1 and Fish 2: The pragmatism behind India’s WTO ratification

 India became the 123rd WTO member to ratify the multilateral Agreement on Fisheries subsidies (AoFS) when it deposited the Instrument of Acceptance for Phase 1 on July 20, 2026. The ratification is restricted to disciplining Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated fishing (IUU), protection for overfished

The 7% growth problem: Why the next 7% will be harder

India has become accustomed to hearing the 7% growth number. It is now less a milestone than an expectation. Yet the paradox is becoming clearer: maintaining 7% growth may be considerably harder than achieving it once. India’s real GDP grew 7.7% in FY2025–26, following growth of 6.5% in FY202

The Constitution cannot be altered: Justice Abhay Oka

Justice Abhay Oka, who retired from the Supreme Court in May 2025, has said that the Constitution of India cannot be altered. Explaining the landmark Kesavananda Bharati judgment (1973) on the basic structure of the Constitution, he said, “This is one judgment that has saved democracy in India.&rdq

How the flora and fauna evolved in the Indian subcontinent

Mammals of India  By A.J.T. Johnsingh and P.O. Nameer HarperCollins India in association with Bombay Natural History Society  

India`s renewable race is moving beyond megawatts

When Shell bought Sprng Energy in 2022, India`s renewable energy market appeared to offer precisely what global energy majors were seeking: scale, growth and a place in one of the world`s largest energy transitions. Four years later, Shell is selling the same business to Aditya Birla Group for an enterpris

Upcoming Conferences



-->

Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter