NMC bill is the first step in larger reforms in health sector: NITI Aayog advisor

Alok Kumar, a 1993 batch IAS officer of UP cadre, joined NITI Aayog as advisor in July 2015. He talks about the proposed National Medical Commission (NMC) bill.

pankaj

Pankaj Kumar | October 15, 2016 | New Delhi


#medical council of India   #MCI   #NMC   #national medical commission   #NITI Aayog  
Alok Kumar, advisor, NITI Aayog
Alok Kumar, advisor, NITI Aayog

Is the way MCI being run the only problem or the issue is about its rules, regulations and mandate? 
It was both. There were structural problems in MCI’s composition in that there was an inherent conflict of interest when the regulators were elected from amongst those who they were supposed to regulate. It became an exclusive domain of the doctors though health as a subject is of vital concern to citizens and in other countries doctors as well as non-doctors jointly regulate the profession. 
 
As far as the rules and regulations formulated by the MCI, they have been largely focused on regulating the inputs rather than outcome. There is a lack of transparency in the processes followed by the MCI and that is why it comes across as an opaque organisation which lacks the professionalism required to regulate such an important profession which affects all the citizens.
 
How will replacing MCI with NMC improve medical education in India?
By institutionalising an outcome-based regulation approach under the proposed NMC, the focus of the regulator will shift from inputs to quality of medical personnel being produced by the medical institutions. This shift in focus would enable the institutions to focus on quality of teaching and improving the knowledge and skills imparted to their students rather than worrying about the inspector raj. By ensuring proactive disclosure on part of the medical institutions in the form of rating of colleges, the NMC will facilitate the prospective students of making an informed choice, while selecting their institutions of study.
 
 
 
Is MCI alone responsible for the downfall in medical education?
It would be unrealistic to blame MCI alone for the current state of disrepair in the medical education as the parliamentary standing committee points out in its report. But it will also be delusional not to apportion a fair share of responsibility upon MCI in view of the processes, institutional mechanisms and the approach to regulation adopted by them.
 
How does the bill address the concerns regarding fee regulation?
Regulation of fee needs to balance to countervailing public policy objectives: one objective is to keep fees attractive enough to ensure that private capital investment is attracted to this sector to address the huge shortage in medical personnel and the other is to keep the fees low enough so that no meritorious student is denied an opportunity of pursuing medical studies because she/he cannot afford the fees and also that after passing out they do not need to gouge their patients to recover the investment made in their education. Both are valid concerns and that is why a 40:60 ratio of subsidised seats to fully paid seats was considered as an acceptable compromise. 
 
Many experts call it a big-bang reform. How do you see it? 
We see it as a first essential step in the much larger endeavour of reforming the health sector in India. I am personally wary of using such adjectives as “big-bang” because reform is a continuous process.
 
How will you ensure the new body doesn’t indulge in corruption?
Corruption is defined by this famous formula: Corruption = Monopoly + Discretion – Accountability. In the proposed NMC bill we have tried to reduce monopoly by farming off separate functions to independent boards; to reduce discretion by moving to a well established and a non-discretionary outcome-based regulation from an opaque, non-transparent and discretionary input based regulatory approach. We have also sought enhanced accountability by a well institutionalised system of appointing regulators, provisions for avoidance of conflict of interests, by including non-doctors to bring in perspectives other than those of medical profession and finally a well functioning secretariat that would assist the NMC.
 
Before drafting the bill, you invited feedback from public and experts. What was the response? 
We had an overwhelming response from the common public, members of the profession, various associations and experts. In all, we received over 15,000 suggestions, which we have examined and classified into broad categories. The committee constituted to finalise the draft bill is likely to convene shortly to consider these suggestions and take a final view on the bill. 
 
Why are some branches of IMA and associations of specialist doctors protesting against the bill?
I see this more as a response to protect the interests of the doctor community without taking into account the disillusionment of the general citizens with the current system of regulatory framework that has been put in place. I think this is quite short-sighted because alienating the general public by insistence upon continuing with a discredited system, they stand the risk of a complete lack of faith in the profession, which would not be a good situation for any of the concerned stakeholders.
 
Many ask if on similar lines, the government would scrap bodies like Bar Council of India, the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India and replace them with nominated bodies.
 
At present there is no proposal at the NITI Aayog to consider changes in any other professional regulatory bodies; but it is also true that we do not have a scathing indictment of any other body by parliament (representing the sovereign will of the people) as in regard to the MCI. 
 
(The interview appears in October 16-31, 2016 edition of Governance Now)

Comments

 

Other News

Kodnani’s acquittal raises doubts about criminal justice system

 Maya Kodnani, a BJP leader who was the MLA from Naroda when this locality on the outskirts of Ahmedabad witnessed one of the most gruesome episodes during the Gujarat riots of 2002, was acquitted by the Gujarat High Court on Friday. Her acquittal in the Naroda Patiya massacre case is only a sequel to

BMC took nearly 48 days in resolving one complaint

The number of civic complaints with BMC has increased from 61,910 in 2015 to 92,329 in 2017, which is 49% in two years. A report titled ‘Civic Issues Registered by Citizens and Deliberations done by Municipal Councillors in Mumbai’ released by Praja Foundation has found some interesting facts a

Who is Atishi Marlena?

Atishi Marlena is among the nine AAP functionaries who were dismissed by the union home ministry asserting that their posts were created without the approval of the centre. Marlena, served as education advisor of the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP)-led government in Delhi. While she was intrumental in improving the

Leadership? Learn it from Jaising, Ambani, Doshi

The Fortune magazine has named three Indians – lawyer Indira Jaising, industrialist Mukesh Ambani and architect Balkrishna V Doshi – among the world’s greatest fifty leaders.

Energy as the new value system for redesigning daily life

Remember Kardashev scale? For the uninitiated, it’s a method of measuring a civilization’s level of technological advancement, based on the amount of energy it is able to use for communication. We will get to its unconventional relevance to the big urban questions at the end, but just keep it a

48 MLAs, MPs have declared cases of crime against women

Out of 1580 MPs and MLAs with criminal cases, 48 (three MPs and 45 MLAs) have declared cases related to crime against women. The Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR) and

Current Issue

Current Issue

Video

CM Nitish’s convoy attacked in Buxar

Opinion

Facebook    Twitter    Google Plus    Linkedin    Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter