Britain warns over state-sponsored cyber attacks

On Monday, British government advisor Pauline Neville-Jones said Russia and China were "certainly some of them"

AFP | November 3, 2011



British Foreign Secretary William Hague issued a warning on Wednesday to countries which sponsor cyber attacks, at the close of a global cyberspace conference in London.

He would not name and shame those responsible, saying the two-day talks were intended to be "constructive", but government advisor Pauline Neville-Jones said on Monday that Russia and China were "certainly some of them".

"State-sponsored attacks are not in the interests of any country long term, and those governments that perpetrate them need to bring them under control," Hague told delegates in his closing statement.

He told reporters later: "We have and we will have... in the future vigorous private discussions about this, particularly if our ability to detect cyber attacks and the source of them improves."

The conference, involving over 700 officials, security experts, technology firms and NGOs from more than 60 countries including Russia and China, failed to reach any formal agreement on the broad range of issues discussed.

But Hague said the talks made "important progress" towards setting out a global agenda, which will be followed up in conferences in Hungary in 2012 and South Korea in 2013.

Both Hague and US Vice President Joe Biden, who addressed the meeting via videolink on Tuesday, had pressed the need for Internet freedom, and despite acknowledging a difference of opinion, Hague said most delegates agreed.

"There is a difference between British, American, European societies on the one hand and China, a different political system (with) different attitudes to freedom of expression offline as well as online," he told reporters.

But in his final statement he insisted: "There was overwhelming support for the principle that cyberspace must remain open to innovation and the free flow of ideas, information and expression."

Hague said there was "no appetite" to develop new legally-binding treaties on the Internet, and said speakers had tended to back "a transparent and stable framework of self-regulation" rather than any government intervention.

However, most agreed that better global cooperation and collaboration was needed "to avoid misunderstandings", Hague said.

Comments

 

Other News

Income Tax dept holds Ghatkopar Outreach on new IT Act

The Income Tax Department organised an outreach programme in Ghatkopar, Mumbai, to raise awareness about the key features of the Income Tax Act, 2025, effective April 1, 2026. The initiative is part of a nationwide effort to promote taxpayer awareness, simplify compliance, and strengthen a transparent, eff

Making AI work where governance is closest to people

India’s next governance leap may not solely come from digitisation. It will come from making public systems more intelligent, more adaptive, and more responsive to the dynamics at the grassroots. That opportunity is especially significant at the panchayat level, where governance is not an abstract po

Borrowing troubles: How small loans are quietly trapping youth

A silent crisis is playing out in the pocket of young India, not in stock markets or government treasuries, but in smartphones of college students and first-jobbers who clicked on the Apply Now button without reading the small print.  A decade ago, to take a loan, you had to do some paperwor

A 19th-century pilgrim’s progress

The Travels of a Sadhu in the Himalayas By Jaladhar Sen (Translated by Somdatta Mandal) Speaking Tiger Books, 259 pages, ₹499.00  

India faces critical shortage of skin donors amid rising burn cases

India reports nearly 70 lakh burn injury cases every year, resulting in approximately 1.4 lakh deaths annually. Experts estimate that up to 50% of these lives could be saved with adequate access to skin donations.   A significant concern is that around 70% of burn victims fall wi

Not just politics, let`s discuss policies too

Why public policy matters Most days, India`s loudest debates stop at the ballot box. We can name every major leader and recall every campaign slogan. Still, far fewer of us can explain why a widow`s pension is delayed or how a government school`s budget is actually approved. That


Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter