Sibal dismisses allegations of favouring pvt firm as motivated

NGO alleges him that he favoured private firm Reliance Communications by reducing the penalty in 13 circles

PTI | July 8, 2011



Telecom Minister Kapil Sibal on Thursday dismissed as "motivated and defamatory" a petition filed in the Supreme Court against him alleging that he had favoured private firm Reliance Communications by reducing the penalty from Rs 650 crore to Rs 5 crore in 13 circles.  He contended that the figures and other grounds cited by the NGO Centre for Public Interest Litigation (CPIL) in the petition were wrong and misleading.

To press his argument, Sibal cited a communication of dated February 8, 2011, from Universal Service Obligation Fund (USOF) suggesting imposition of a penalty of Rs 50 crore against Reliance Communication for "violation of terms and conditions" of the USOF agreement by "voluntary, unilateral and unauthorised switching off/closure of services" to users.

He explained that there was a contract between USOF and Reliance for putting up towers in rural areas and any violation has to be dealt as per the provisions of the contractual agreement.

"This whole process (petition) is malicious. This is motivated and defamatory. I wonder why proceedings have been filed in a court which is dealing with only 2G matters," Sibal told PTI. He said this has nothing to do with 2G case which is being heard by the Supreme Court.
A
n NGO, Centre for Public Interest Litigation (CPIL) has filed the application in the Supreme Court seeking CBI probe against Sibal for allegedly favouring private firm by abusing his position to over-rule the unanimous view of senior DoT officials. "It is a matter of grave concern that petitions are being filed in this manner," the minister added.

 

Comments

 

Other News

How Rafi, Raj Kapoor helped pave the way for a great uranium deal

There`s a certain moment in diplomacy that`s too personal to be captured in a communiqué, too small to make the front page, but more revealing than the front page. This week, prime minister Narendra Modi reached Tashkent and, amid the pomp of state visits, managed to evoke the old Bollywood tunes

Distinguishing Fish 1 and Fish 2: The pragmatism behind India’s WTO ratification

 India became the 123rd WTO member to ratify the multilateral Agreement on Fisheries subsidies (AoFS) when it deposited the Instrument of Acceptance for Phase 1 on July 20, 2026. The ratification is restricted to disciplining Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated fishing (IUU), protection for overfished

The 7% growth problem: Why the next 7% will be harder

India has become accustomed to hearing the 7% growth number. It is now less a milestone than an expectation. Yet the paradox is becoming clearer: maintaining 7% growth may be considerably harder than achieving it once. India’s real GDP grew 7.7% in FY2025–26, following growth of 6.5% in FY202

The Constitution cannot be altered: Justice Abhay Oka

Justice Abhay Oka, who retired from the Supreme Court in May 2025, has said that the Constitution of India cannot be altered. Explaining the landmark Kesavananda Bharati judgment (1973) on the basic structure of the Constitution, he said, “This is one judgment that has saved democracy in India.&rdq

How the flora and fauna evolved in the Indian subcontinent

Mammals of India  By A.J.T. Johnsingh and P.O. Nameer HarperCollins India in association with Bombay Natural History Society  

India`s renewable race is moving beyond megawatts

When Shell bought Sprng Energy in 2022, India`s renewable energy market appeared to offer precisely what global energy majors were seeking: scale, growth and a place in one of the world`s largest energy transitions. Four years later, Shell is selling the same business to Aditya Birla Group for an enterpris

Upcoming Conferences



-->

Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter