Tata entitled to 2G spectrum for Delhi ahead of Idea, Unitech

Tribunal's direction comes over a petition filed by the Tata group firm in December 2010 alleging "discrimination and arbitrariness" against it by the Department of Telecom (DoT) under the cross-over spectrum policy

PTI | July 5, 2011



In a boost to Tata Telservices, the telecom tribunal TDSAT on Monday allowed the plea of the service provider and directed the Department of Telecom to immediately release the GSM spectrum for the Delhi circle on priority basis.

The tribunal also slammed Aditya Birla group firm Idea Cellular and Unitech and said that they cannot claim parity with Tata Teleservices merely because they have submitted their licence fee earlier than the Tata group firm.

The Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal bench headed by its Chairman Justice S B Sinha also directed Idea and Unitech to pay cost to Tata Tele equally as the cost of its litigation.

Allowing the plea of Tata group firm claiming priority over GSM allocation for Delhi circle, TDSAT said, "In terms of the policy decisions dated October 19, 2007, and January 10, 2008, TTSL having deposited the entire amount of the fees as has been recommended by TRAI was entitled to grant of priority in the matter of allocation of spectrum over Idea, Unitech and others".

It also pulled up the DoT for wrongly categorising Tata Tele and said the company was entitled to be placed in Category III and not in Category V for the spectrum allocation.

It further said, "Tata Tele as an 'existing licensee' does not fall in the same class as the 'new licensees' despite the fact that it was required to apply for and obtain amendment in its licence".

"Neither Idea nor Unitech or Videocon can claim any priority over TTSL only because it has deposited the entry fees immediately prior to TTSL," said the tribunal while rejecting their claims.

It also rejected plea that Tata's approached late and said, "petition of Tata Tele, therefore, should be allowed and those of Idea and Unitech are to be dismissed. Idea and Unitech shall pay the costs of these petitions of TTSL in equal proportions.

The tribunal's direction came over a petition filed by the Tata group firm in December 2010 alleging "discrimination and arbitrariness" against it by the Department of Telecom (DoT) under the cross-over spectrum policy.

Tata Tele had contended that under the dual technology regime, the Wireless Planning and Coordination Wing of the DoT has allocated spectrum to Reliance Communications, HFCL and Shyam Telelink.

"In a clear case of discrimination and arbitrariness, DoT allocated the spectrum to similarly placed Reliance Communications Ltd, HFCL and Shyam Telelink Ltd", said Tata in its petition adding that this was despite it being the first applicant to apply for GSM on October 19, 2007.

Comments

 

Other News

How Rafi, Raj Kapoor helped pave the way for a great uranium deal

There`s a certain moment in diplomacy that`s too personal to be captured in a communiqué, too small to make the front page, but more revealing than the front page. This week, prime minister Narendra Modi reached Tashkent and, amid the pomp of state visits, managed to evoke the old Bollywood tunes

Distinguishing Fish 1 and Fish 2: The pragmatism behind India’s WTO ratification

 India became the 123rd WTO member to ratify the multilateral Agreement on Fisheries subsidies (AoFS) when it deposited the Instrument of Acceptance for Phase 1 on July 20, 2026. The ratification is restricted to disciplining Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated fishing (IUU), protection for overfished

The 7% growth problem: Why the next 7% will be harder

India has become accustomed to hearing the 7% growth number. It is now less a milestone than an expectation. Yet the paradox is becoming clearer: maintaining 7% growth may be considerably harder than achieving it once. India’s real GDP grew 7.7% in FY2025–26, following growth of 6.5% in FY202

The Constitution cannot be altered: Justice Abhay Oka

Justice Abhay Oka, who retired from the Supreme Court in May 2025, has said that the Constitution of India cannot be altered. Explaining the landmark Kesavananda Bharati judgment (1973) on the basic structure of the Constitution, he said, “This is one judgment that has saved democracy in India.&rdq

How the flora and fauna evolved in the Indian subcontinent

Mammals of India  By A.J.T. Johnsingh and P.O. Nameer HarperCollins India in association with Bombay Natural History Society  

India`s renewable race is moving beyond megawatts

When Shell bought Sprng Energy in 2022, India`s renewable energy market appeared to offer precisely what global energy majors were seeking: scale, growth and a place in one of the world`s largest energy transitions. Four years later, Shell is selling the same business to Aditya Birla Group for an enterpris

Upcoming Conferences



-->

Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter