• About Us
  • Feedback
  • Events Calendar
  • Archives
  • Newsletter
Advanced Search
  • Home
  • News
  • Views
  • GovNow
  • GovNext
  • Login
  • Register
News
  • Top Stories
  • Public Reporter
  • Photo Story
  • Protests & Petitions
  • GNtv
Views
  • Day's Debate
  • Columns
  • Think Tank
  • Interview
  • GNtalk
  • Backstory
GovNow
  • Parliament
  • Your MP
  • Bureaucracy
  • Judiciary
  • Policy
GovNext
  • RTI
  • eGov
  • GreenGov
  • GovPitch
Follow Us
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS
Home › GovNext › eGov › Tata entitled to 2G spectrum for Delhi ahead of Idea, Unitech

Tata entitled to 2G spectrum for Delhi ahead of Idea, Unitech

Tribunal's direction comes over a petition filed by the Tata group firm in December 2010 alleging "discrimination and arbitrariness" against it by the Department of Telecom (DoT) under the cross-over spectrum policy
PTI | July 05 2011

Share

In a boost to Tata Telservices, the telecom tribunal TDSAT on Monday allowed the plea of the service provider and directed the Department of Telecom to immediately release the GSM spectrum for the Delhi circle on priority basis.

The tribunal also slammed Aditya Birla group firm Idea Cellular and Unitech and said that they cannot claim parity with Tata Teleservices merely because they have submitted their licence fee earlier than the Tata group firm.

The Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal bench headed by its Chairman Justice S B Sinha also directed Idea and Unitech to pay cost to Tata Tele equally as the cost of its litigation.

Allowing the plea of Tata group firm claiming priority over GSM allocation for Delhi circle, TDSAT said, "In terms of the policy decisions dated October 19, 2007, and January 10, 2008, TTSL having deposited the entire amount of the fees as has been recommended by TRAI was entitled to grant of priority in the matter of allocation of spectrum over Idea, Unitech and others".

It also pulled up the DoT for wrongly categorising Tata Tele and said the company was entitled to be placed in Category III and not in Category V for the spectrum allocation.

It further said, "Tata Tele as an 'existing licensee' does not fall in the same class as the 'new licensees' despite the fact that it was required to apply for and obtain amendment in its licence".

"Neither Idea nor Unitech or Videocon can claim any priority over TTSL only because it has deposited the entry fees immediately prior to TTSL," said the tribunal while rejecting their claims.

It also rejected plea that Tata's approached late and said, "petition of Tata Tele, therefore, should be allowed and those of Idea and Unitech are to be dismissed. Idea and Unitech shall pay the costs of these petitions of TTSL in equal proportions.

The tribunal's direction came over a petition filed by the Tata group firm in December 2010 alleging "discrimination and arbitrariness" against it by the Department of Telecom (DoT) under the cross-over spectrum policy.

Tata Tele had contended that under the dual technology regime, the Wireless Planning and Coordination Wing of the DoT has allocated spectrum to Reliance Communications, HFCL and Shyam Telelink.

"In a clear case of discrimination and arbitrariness, DoT allocated the spectrum to similarly placed Reliance Communications Ltd, HFCL and Shyam Telelink Ltd", said Tata in its petition adding that this was despite it being the first applicant to apply for GSM on October 19, 2007.

Related stories

Stories you might like

Govt in final stages of protection against cyber attacks: NSA
Garmin eyes 30% share in personal navigation device mkt
Govt must ensure transparency in EWS admissions
Telecom CEOs warn mobile tariffs may double
Idea adds maximum subscribers after number portability

More stories in this section

Here's the real MMS scandal
Here's the real MMS scandal
Sibal to DoP: launch premium logistic services within 6 months
Comments posted as an unregistered user will need to be approved by an editor. If you would like to post comments without delay, please register / login.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Input format
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters (without spaces) shown in the image.

In This Section

  • Most Emailed
  • Most Popular
  • Most Commented
  • The man who nailed Nithari’s lies...
  • Fighting corruption through RTI ...
  • File complaints with Maha police online ...
  • Extensive broadband usage to make OECD richer...
2G anna hazare Bihar BJP CBI china congress corruption Delhi DoT e-governance facebook Gujarat High Court India jairam ramesh Kapil Sibal Karnataka Maharashtra Manmohan Singh Mumbai parliament P Chidambaram Pranab Mukherjee prime minister rajya sabha RTI supreme court US Uttar Pradesh
more tags
News
  • Top Stories
  • Public Reporter
  • Photo Story
  • Protests & Petitions
  • GNtv
Views
  • Day's Debate
  • Columns
  • Think Tank
  • Interview
  • GNtalk
  • Backstory
GovNow
  • Parliament
  • Your MP
  • Bureaucracy
  • Judiciary
  • Policy
GovNext
  • RTI
  • eGov
  • GreenGov
  • GovPitch
Follow Us
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS
Copyright ©2010 Governance Now
  • Copyright Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Help
  • Advertise with us
  • Careers
  • Contact Us
Developed by LDI