REC, PFC didn’t conduct appropriate due diligence: CAG

Audit noticed that many of projects, where the promoter had poor experience, were not completed within schedule

GN Bureau | August 22, 2017


#Power Finance Corporation Limited   #power generation   #Rural Electrification Corporation Limited   #CAG  


Rural Electrification Corporation Limited (REC) and Power Finance Corporation Limited (PFC) did not conduct appropriate due diligence during credit appraisal in power generation projects and in the process assumed higher risks on the loan accounts, noted the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) in a report.
 
Participation of private sector in power generation grew significantly with the enactment of the Electricity Act, 2003. REC and PFC also participated in these projects as lenders. Over 2013-14 to 2015-16, REC and PFC disbursed loans amounting to Rs 47,706.88 crore to Independent Power Producers (IPPs), said report No.34 of 2017 - Compliance audit Union Government Loans to Independent Power Producers by Rural Electrification.
 
A significant proportion of loans extended to IPPs became stressed/turned Non-Performing Assets (NPAs). In this context, Audit reviewed the procedures adopted by REC and PFC for appraisal, sanction and disbursement of loans to IPPs during 2013-14 to 2015-16.
 
CAG said that both REC and PFC deviated from their internal guidelines and also did not conform to the Reserve Bank of India guidelines in this regard.
 
“The experience and ability of the promoters to develop the projects was not assessed objectively. The experience of project promoters were assessed based on individual judgement and promoters who did not have relevant sector experience were found eligible for loans. Audit noticed that many of projects, where the promoter had poor experience, were not completed within schedule,” it said.
 
The financial capacity of the promoter to bring in equity for the project in the face of competing demands was not adequately assessed. In the sample selected by Audit, nine projects had to be restructured multiple times which increased the interest during construction by Rs 13,312.78 crore in six loan cases and resulted in NPAs of Rs 3,038.44 crore in three loan cases, said the report.
 
CAG said that the guidelines of REC and PFC do not envisage a situation where the contractors engaged by the promoter for implementation of a project are related parties of the promoters. Audit noticed that in seven loan cases, the contractor and the promoter were same/ related entities. In these cases, the loan sanctioned by REC and PFC to the promoter for execution of the project remained with the promoter group and the actual stake of the promoter in implementing the project was difficult to assess. It was also noticed that the credit worthiness of the contractors and their ability to fulfil contractual obligations was not being appraised by REC and PFC.
 
As per the Common Loan Agreement (CLA), loan funds were to be disbursed after fulfilling the pre-disbursement conditions mentioned in the loan agreements. These conditions were incorporated in the loan agreements in order to mitigate the risks perceived at the time of detailed appraisal of the borrowers regarding their ability to bring in required equity funds and for recovery of loan within the prescribed time. Audit, however, observed that the pre-disbursements conditions were relaxed by REC and PFC from time to time in five loan cases. After the first disbursement, subsequent disbursements were often made to save the funds already disbursed, further relaxing the conditions and extending the timelines.
 
The report went on to say that as per RBI guidelines (July 2013), financing agencies should not depend entirely on certificates issued by Chartered Accountants but strengthen their internal controls and credit risk management system to enhance the quality of their loan portfolio. However, no policy in REC and PFC was in place to ensure end utilization of funds by the borrower and both the Companies were solely dependent on Auditors Certificate regarding end use of the funds. Audit noticed siphoning/diversion of Rs 2,457.60 crore by the borrowers/promoters in the sample reviewed.
 

Comments

 

Other News

Covid-19: How states compare on recovery rate

While India’s Covid-19 recovery rate has improved to 63.02%, there are 19 states that are doing better than that. They are led by the national capital, Delhi. Here is a list of these states, as on Monday evening: Ladakh (UT)    85.45% Delhi   

5.3 lakh recover from Covid-19; active cases at 2.9 lakh

Though India remains the third-most affected country in terms of Covid-19 infections, the situation seems to be improving as the number of people who have recovered from infection has rose to 5,34,620, with a recovery rate of 62.93 percent. “Focussed and coordinated steps taken in tand

Covid-19: Let`s introspect, learn right lessons, says VP

Vice president M Venkaiah Naidu has urged the people to introspect on the life during the last few months under coronavirus induced confinement and assess if they have learned the right lessons and equipped themselves to deal with such uncertainties. Seeking to engage with people on the cau

Four trends that will shape healthcare post-Covid

The Covid-19 pandemic has disrupted economies and healthcare systems across the world. Even in the countries, like the US, that have the highest spend on healthcare and public health emergency preparedness, the impact of coronavirus pandemic on health and livelihoods of people has been tremendous. There ar

India to play leading role in global revival: Modi

India would play a leading role in the global revival, prime minister Narendra Modi said on Thursday, as he addressed the inaugural session of India Global week via video-conference. He said that this is closely linked with two factors. “First is - Indian talent and second is India`s

BMC spells out numbers to counter Fadnavis’ claims

The BrihanMumbai municipal corporation (BMC) has countered Maharashtra leader of opposition Devendra Fadanvis’s suspicions of fewer Covid-19 tests, as it outlined various measures it has adopted since the first test conducted on February 3, and how it has gradually brought down the number of cases in



Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook    Twitter    Google Plus    Linkedin    Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter