Development plan for Mumbai growth was at the cost of green zones and heritage structures
GN Bureau | April 21, 2015
So strong was the civil society protest against Mumbai’s new development plan that the Maharashtra did not wait till Saturday (the last day for filing objections to it), but scrapped it on Tuesday.
The Mumbai Development Plan (DP) 2034 was released on February 16 and it had been strongly opposed by citizens, including politicians and film actors, who normally are reticent about civic affairs.
The cabinet headed by chief minister Devendra Fadnavis took the decision on Tuesday. The state government had invited feedback on the draft development plan till Saturday. But even before that, Fadnavis announced that it was being scrapped. He has ordered a new plan within four months.
READ: How not to prepare a development plan
The government was inundated with complaints against the DP, especially existing land use (ELU), reservation and floor space index (FSI). The plan for Mumbai called for development at the cost of green zones and heritage structures.
Last week, residents of Mumbai's affluent Pali Hill held a silent protest against the proposal to allow hawkers to set up shop on footpaths.
Film stars Aamir Khan, Salman Khan and Farhan Akhtar were among those who joined Maharashtra Navnirman Sena chief Raj Thackeray in opposing the plan.
In the plan, Aarey Colony with has over 2,000 hectares of green cover, was listed in the plan not as a forest but as a growth centre. Incidentally, on the periphery of the Aarey Colony is Film City, where shooting for films and TV shows is held.
Architects and planners had called the plan "irrelevant" to the needs and aspirations of Mumbai residents. They were against the proposed increase in the FSI, allowing taller buildings.
According to the DP, the allocation for open spaces, education and healthcare service has been reduced significantly while no provision was made for the road network, water pipelines, sewage lines and other basic services.
The increase in bulk FSI was linked to proximity to mass transit modes but not indexed to physical and social infrastructure. Citizens had objected to variable FSI up to 8 while some of them alleged that it would benefit the builders lobby.
Till Monday, the civic officials had received 25,000 suggestions/objections. Compiling the suggestions/objections list is a normal procedure when a DP is made public. A committee shortlists the parties concerned and a hearing is held under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning (MRTP) Act. Based the feedback, changes will be made in the final DP before the notification.
Have things changed five years after the Nirbhaya incident? I see Delhi as the capital of protest, not just capital of rape as it is often painted. In terms of legislation, in 2013 one-stop-centres were set up after the landmark report of Justice Verma Committee and Justice Usha
The winter session of parliament is starting and I am confident that it will be productive session, said prime minister Narendra Modi on Friday. He hoped that there is “constructive debate and we come up with innovative solutions to our nation`s problems”. Speaking
When prime minister Narendra Modi dedicated Kalvari submarine to the nation, it was significant for more than one reason. Not only did the submarine enhance India’s capability as a blue water navy, it also highlighted Project 75 that focused on a major exercise to build six submarines.
A five judge constitution bench of the Supreme Court in its interim ruling on Friday has fixed the deadline for linking Aadhaar with services including mobile numbers as March 31, 2018. This excludes opening up of new bank accounts for those already having Aadhaar. For tho
Assembly elections in Gujarat, since 2002, have been like Churchill’s description of Russia – with a little twist: wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma, but eventually a non-riddle. They have been following the same script. When the campaign begins, the outcome looks utterly un
Rahul Gandhi has become the president of India’s grand old party. Nobody else wanted to, since none contested. By any parameter, it is not a welcome move in a democracy. Regardless of your views on his leadership abilities, the fact remains that there was no contest, no election for the top post. The