Congress shines the sun on Modi's "shame" -Governance Now

Congress shines the sun on Modi's "shame"

Says Gujarat CM has brought 'ill-repute' to his high office, BJP says 'not an embarassment'

PTI | March 27, 2010

Congress on Saturday slammed Gujarat chief minister Narendra Modi saying his appearance before investigators probing 2002 riots has brought "ill-repute" to the high office he holds, while the BJP dismissed suggestions that it was an embarrassment for the party.

"It is unprecedented that a person occupying a constitutional position, that too of the chief minister, has been summoned for investigation in a case of mass murder," Congress spokesman Manish Tewari said.

"If the BJP has even an iota of morality, it should have asked him to step down before bringing such a high office to ill-repute," he said.

Modi appeared before the Supreme Court-appointed Special Investigation Team (SIT) in Gandhinagar and was questioned for the first time on his alleged role in the Gujarat riots.

BJP sought to blame the media for speculating on Modi's non-appearance before the SIT.

"It was the media that created an impression that he (Modi) was not keen on appearing before the SIT. Modi respects the judiciary. He abides by the law as also the institutions set up by the Supreme Court," BJP spokesman Prakash Javadekar said.

Congress spokesperson Jayanthi Natarajan said, "In public perception, Modi has been held guilty. I don't think he has done anything extraordinary by appearing before the Special Investigation Team probing the Gujarat riots.

"He should be brought to justice," she said.

Another BJP spokesperson Nirmala Seetharaman denied suggestions that Modi's appearance before the Supreme Court- appointed probe panel was an embarrassment for the party.

"I dont think it is any embarrassment to the party. The chief minister had said in the Gujarat Assembly and also in the public letter last week that nobody was above the law and that also included the Chief Minister of the state," she said.

She also pointed out that no FIR was registered against the Gujarat chief minister.

Social activist and known Modi-baiter Teesta Setalvad termed the SIT's questioning of the BJP leader as a "significant development."

"It is a very significant step that a sitting chief minister is actually forced to answer very hard questions regarding his role in the 2002 riots," she said.

Setalvad said that the development was significant as it sent out a message that with the Supreme Court watching, nobody is above the law.

Comments

Other News

Maharashtra adopts hybrid model for Census 2026 data collection

The government has initiated preparations for Census 2026 in Maharashtra, introducing a hybrid approach that combines optional self-enumeration with comprehensive door-to-door data collection to ensure complete coverage across the state. According to senior officials, the Self-

What the nine Indian Nobel winners have in common

A Touch Of Genius: The Wisdom of India’s Nobel Laureates Edited by Rudrangshu Mukherjee Aleph Books, Rs 1499, 848 pages

Income Tax dept holds Ghatkopar Outreach on new IT Act

The Income Tax Department organised an outreach programme in Ghatkopar, Mumbai, to raise awareness about the key features of the Income Tax Act, 2025, effective April 1, 2026. The initiative is part of a nationwide effort to promote taxpayer awareness, simplify compliance, and strengthen a transparent, eff

Making AI work where governance is closest to people

India’s next governance leap may not solely come from digitisation. It will come from making public systems more intelligent, more adaptive, and more responsive to the dynamics at the grassroots. That opportunity is especially significant at the panchayat level, where governance is not an abstract po

Borrowing troubles: How small loans are quietly trapping youth

A silent crisis is playing out in the pocket of young India, not in stock markets or government treasuries, but in smartphones of college students and first-jobbers who clicked on the Apply Now button without reading the small print. A decade ago, to take a loan, you had to do some paperwor