The Indian judiciary is in a disarray and that is worrying.
Deevakar Anand | August 5, 2014
For some time now, higher(est) judiciary in India has been groping for a toehold to tide over unsavoury controversies it has found itself involved in. Back to back accusations have been flung at its face that significantly mars its holy cow image.
The issue of former solicitor general Gopal Subramnium’s name being rejected by the centre for elevation as a supreme court judge and later top lawyer Uday U Lalit replacing him exposed the breach in the contours of ‘separation of power’ provision underlined in the constitution. It exemplified how the government of the day can prevail upon judicial appointments at the apex court.
That followed by former SC judge and press council of India chairman Markandey Katju’s allegations that three former chief justices of India backed the ‘corrupt’ Madras high court judge under pressure from the UPA government.
On August 4, just when it looked that the media was beginning to turn focus on other issues, a report in the Times of India that a Madhya Pradesh high court judge allegedly asked an additional district judge of Gwalior – a woman - to "perform dance on an item song" at a function at his home and influenced her transfer to a remote location when she didn’t succumb to his sexual advances came as a shocker.
While only a fair probe will establish the truth in the case, within judiciary or outside it, such acts denote impropriety at its worst.
But the fact that such allegations of moral impropriety are being made against an institution that not just have the constitutional authority to punish the law-breakers but also to keep a check on the erring law-makers is disturbing. It is not in the recent past that judiciary’s conduct has come under the moral scanner.
For that matter a young lawyer earlier this year accused former SC judge Swatenter Kumar of sexual harassment and last year a law intern labeled similar against another apex court judge AK Ganguly. In both the cases, the charges have not been established yet.
Indian judiciary’s hall of shame is replete with several other instances.
When AM Ahmadi was chief justice of India betweenOctober 1994-March 1997, his daughter, a practising lawyer in SC , it was alleged received special favors from some judges.
For extravagant expenditure at his residence and audit report objections to it while being the chief justice of Punjab and Haryana high court earlier, then SC judge justice V Ramaswami was the first judge in independent India’s history to face impeachment proceedings in 1993.
In 2010, impeachment proceedings were initiated against then chief justice of the Sikkim HC, PD Dinakaran for holding unexplained assets and land at his hometown Arakkonam in Tamil Nadu.
In 2011, justice Soumitra Sen of the Calcutta HC faced impeachment proceedings for misappropriating public funds to the tune of Rs 32 lakhs. In 2008, Delhi court framed charges against its own former former Delhi High Court judge Shamit Mukherjee in a DDA land scam case.
Nirmal Yadav, a former Punjab and Haryana HC judge was relieved from judicial services in the 2008 cash-at door scandal.
If not lost, the sacrosanct nature of the Indian judiciary has arguably hit the lowest ebb. The Indian judiciary is in a disarray and that’s worrying.
How else do we see the dirty picture that has emerged out of such an accusation as that against the MP judge?
Everyone in Yogi Adityanath`s office declares that Yogi’s political career is founded on the work carried out from there, first when he was mahant of the influential temple, and then as an MP. Vijendra Singh, who works at the office, says “It’s because of these letters that Yogiji has n
Banks have advanced a staggering Rs 29,46,060 crore to the industrial sector, of which Rs 6.93 lakh crore are non-performing assets (NPAs). Finance minister Arun Jaitley informed
Here are 10 things that Kenneth Rogoff, Thomas D Cabot professor of public policy, department of economics, Harvard University, and author of `The Curse of Cash`, said about demonetisation at the Delhi Economics Conclave 2017: 1. The core idea for demone
As Ram Nath Kovind readies to take charge as president, the government is forming his team, naming three officials. Ashok Malik, former journalist and commentator known for his pro-right views, will serve as the press secretary to the president. Bharat Lal, Gujarat&rs
Back in the early 1990s, Shankarsinh Vaghela was (or at least perceived to be) more popular of the two people running the BJP show in Gujarat. Today, the other man is the prime minister, and Vaghela is reduced to a footnote – albeit an important one – in the Narendra Modi saga. &n
At 70, Dr Aziz Ahmad, a well-known homeopath and politician now with Congress, still has a busy practice in Abu Bazaar, in old Gorakhpur. During working hours, the lane in which he has a clinic becomes jam-packed with patients and their vehicles. People speak of naming the lane after him.