Weak regulators, callous pharma companies, and an anti-generic IPR regime. Is there a pill for good luck?
Pankaj Kumar | March 12, 2014
In an ideal world Ranbaxy Laboratories might not exist anymore. The world, however, is imperfect and more so in India, where the leading generic drug maker continues to flourish even after four of its plants have been found to be manufacturing medicines not fit for human consumption.
The rot could have stemmed if our drug regulators had stepped in back in 2004-05, when Dinesh Thakur and his colleague Rajinder Kumar first blew the whistle on Ranbaxy’s fudging of drug test reports. After all, the US food and drug administration (FDA) did step in, with large-scale investigation which led to warnings and import alerts naming two of the Ranbaxy plants.
The rot could still have been stopped if our drug regulators had stepped in May last year, when a US court fined the company $500 million for fudging drug data and selling adulterated drugs (and awarded $49 million to Thakur). If Indian authorities were indeed going to wake up, this was the moment. So, the government swung into action and took effective measures.
A flurry of activity ensued. As minister of state of chemicals and fertilisers Srikant Kumar Jena said in his written reply to a question in the Rajya Sabha, “The DCGI [Drug Controller General of India] has already been ordered to review the good manufacturing practices compliance of the manufacturing facilities of Ranbaxy in India as well as to ascertain the quality, safety and efficacy of drugs manufactured for the domestic market at these facilities.”
Yet something was amiss. Within a few months, the US FDA ‘prohibited’ one more Ranbaxy plant, this one at Mohali, and issued an import alert . By January, another plant (in Toansa village of Punjab) was added to the list.
“The questions about Ranbaxy’s Toansa facilities come in the wake of the firm pleading guilty to seven criminal charges relating to fraud last May, and coughing up $500 million in fines. To date the FDA has restricted imports from three other Ranbaxy facilities in India, including Paonta Sahib, Dewas and Mohali,” the US FDA said in a press statement, unwittingly or otherwise pointing out the role the Indian authorities should have played.
No wonder when US FDA commissioner Margaret Hamburg visited India in February, she underlined quality concerns in her interactions with officials and industry. In her official blog post, she wrote, “In recent years the FDA has identified significant lapses in quality by some companies operating in the US and around the world. As a result, American consumers have had to endure greater risk of illnesses, recalls, and warnings about the products many of them rely on each day. This is unacceptable. Consumers should be confident that the products they are using are safe and of high quality and when companies sacrifice quality, putting consumers at risk, they must be held accountable.”
Standards, single or double?
These rather strong words could have been avoided if the Indian authorities were ahead of the curve, were as concerned about the Indian consumers as the US authorities are for the American consumers. Instead, DCGI GN Singh’s first reaction, in an interview with the Business Standard was: “If I follow US standards, I will have to shut almost all drug facilities.”
Does that mean the quality of the medicines we consume is way too inferior? No, says Singh: “There are about 49 Standards Writing Institutions across the globe which set drug standards for their respective countries based on technological development, economical situation and regulatory framework of that country. The GMP enforced in different countries may vary as each country is having its own platform for evaluating the safety, efficacy and quality of medicines for its population based on WHO Technical Report Series updated regularly where they participate as member states.” (Singh wanted no further controversy on hand and insisted we interview him only on email.)
On August 23, when Congress veteran Motilal Vora raised the question “whether it is also a fact that Ranbaxy is selling some medicine [banned by the US FDA] in India”, minister Jena’s answer was: “As per the US Law, any drug is considered adulterated, if it is not manufactured, processed, packed, etc. in conformity with the Current Good Manufacturing Practice (CGMP) regulations of the US FDA. However, as per Drugs & Cosmetic Act & Rules, in India, manufacturing of drugs not in conformity with Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) is viewed as non-compliance to GMP under the said Act & Rules.”
Is that answer assuring? If you are taking Amoxycillin, a common antibiotic to treat sinusitis, tonsillitis, pneumonia and some other ailments, and if you know that the US FDA had issued import alert against this and other drugs manufactured at the Dewas and Paonta Sahib units of Ranbaxy, would you go ahead?
Because, beyond the abstractions – about the difference between GMP and CGMP and different standards in different places – are findings of the US FDA. Here are some of the things US FDA inspectors found at the Toansa plant during their January 5-11 inspection (as reported in ‘FDA Form 483’):
“Our inspection of the QC analytical and microbiology laboratories found the facility to be in significant disrepair. Laboratory windows within the instrumentation (e.g. HPLC) rooms were found to be un-closeable, Too Numerous To Count (TNTC) flies were observed throughout the sample preparation room, and laboratory reagent/equipment/documentation storage cabinets were found to be broken and un-closeable.”
The report adds that it was not the first time it found “Too Numerous To Count (TNTC) flies” in there. It adds in screaming all-caps: “THIS OBSERVATION WAS DISCUSSED WITH MANAGEMENT DURING THE PREVIOUS FDA INSPECTION CLOSE-OUT MEETING IN 12/2012.”
‘Different standards’ is one standard response from the Indian establishment. The other, merely hinted, is the conspiracy theory. The market for generic drugs (that is, the ones that can be manufactured by anyone and has no copyright) in the US is dominated by imports, in particular from India, and Ranbaxy is the top generic drugmaker in the country. There is a conspiracy to target Ranbaxy as well as other leading Indian players like Wockhardt for allegedly poor quality, many argue.
Mira Shiva, a reputed public health activist, does not dismiss the conspiracy angle. “There could be, because this was the fourth unit getting barred and anyone who knows that it is being scrutinised and investigated will not let it happen as it destroys the future prospects of the company. I know for sure that India is under attack because of intellectual property rights.”
She also maintained that “even small units don’t have flies and hairs and a company like Ranbaxy getting accused raises several doubts”. It, however, remains on record and the company itself is yet to contradict it.
(All Ranbaxy said in a press statement was that it was “disappointed with the recent FDA action and would like to apologize to all its stakeholders for the inconvenience caused by the suspension of shipment”. The release quoted Ranbaxy CEO and MD Arun Sawhney as saying, “This development is clearly unacceptable and an appropriate management action will be taken upon completion of the internal investigation.”) As for not letting the future prospects of the company, it seems that the FDA team had red-flagged flies in 2012 too.
The problem, as the original whistleblower Thakur explained in his media interviews last year, is that the work culture and quality ethics cannot be changed overnight, especially for a big firm. He also appreciates the fact that the DGCI budget is too paltry to oversee a gigantic industry (and catch flies in a lab located in a village).
The solution, says GN Singh, is in long-term investment in sprucing up the regulatory regime. For this purpose, the central drug regulatory infrastructure as well as its state-level counterparts, including drug testing laboratories, must be strengthened under the 12th five-year plan. That’s the hope for tomorrow.
The functioning of a national commission, be it NHRC, NCSC or NCST, depends on its head. Being the chief information commissioner (CIC), what is your vision for CIC? And what has been your experience so far? The chief information commissioner and ten informa
With the help of Right to Information (RTI), the common man not only has the right to know, but also the right to question those in power. This is the foundation of democracy,” said prime minister Narendra Modi at the tenth anniversary celebrations of the Central Information Commission (CIC)
Do you think the fiscal year should be from January to December?
Historically, voter turnout for local elections has lagged behind state assembly elections and general elections. For example, a recent report by Janaagraha shows that Surat recorded 40 percent voter turnout in local polls, 30 percent less than state elections
A group of women were sensitized about their rights at a workshop held in the national capital on Saturday. They were informed about the anti-harassment laws and legal provisions to safeguard women inside and outside their workplace. The workshop – organ
The Narendra Modi- Arvind Kejriwal antagonism has always been about two different kinds of populism. While it may not play out in a municipal election, the fact remains that a Kejriwal chastened by Goa and Punjab faces a mid-term test in the municipal elections. For a politician harbouring intentions of