Farmers protest govt push for sugar sector deregulation

Hundreds of farmers assemble at Jantar Mantar, say Rangarajan committee report shouldn't be implemented in northern states

Ashish Rajput and Shradha Narayanan | December 5, 2012


Sugarcane farmers at a protest rally at Jantar Mantar in New Delhi on Dec 5: Rangarajan panel report speaks only for the mill owners, they say.
Arun Kumar

The Rangarajan commission report on ‘sugar sector regulation’ has garnered a lot of attention, mostly in ways that its authors would rather have not. As the sun beat down, hundreds of farmers raised the heat a few notches further at Jantar Mantar on December 4: coming from several states, they carried sugarcane as a mark of protest and placards that showed their disapproval of the report.

Led by VM Singh, national convenor of Rashtriya Kisan Mazdoor Sangathan and former army chief VK Singh, the protest saw participation of 700 to 800 farmers from Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Haryana, Punjab and Uttarakhand, along with popular farmer leaders from the states.

The Rangarajan commission report, put together by a five-member committee, has called for deregulation of the country’s sugar sector. The report has recommended that the state advice price (SAP) issued by the states be done away with and the FRP (fair and remunerative price) set by the Centre, which is much lower than SAP, be made the standard price. The committee has also sought removal of reservation of areas, among other points.

“We demand that the Rangarajan committee report not be implemented in UP, Bihar, Uttarakhand, Punjab and Haryana,” said V M Singh, calling it a “historic” day that brought together farmers who travelled across hundreds of kilometres to fight for their rights. “If the report is implemented, it will give mill owners a right to rob the farmers,” he said.

Expressing his objection to the report, VK Singh remarked, “How can a commission sitting in an air-conditioned room be given the right to decide the fate of farmers who toil so hard?” Emphasising that they have “told the prime minister” to ignore the report, he said, “We hope he takes into consideration what we have said. If he does not, the farmers should, and will, stand up for their rights.”

Leader of opposition in Haryana assembly Om Prakash Chautala, who was also present, said, “There is a difference in the conditions in south and north India — (there is a) better harvest and recovery of sugarcane in south India. The difference in situation should be considered.”

Criticising the UPA government’s move on allowing foreign direct investment in multi-brand retail, Sultan Ahmed of the Trinamool Congress told the farmers, “If you asked who really runs the government, the answer would be foreign multinationals.”

“This report is speaking only for the mills (owners),” said Ajith Kumar Singh, a farmer from Pilibhit, Uttar Pradesh. Explaining their plight, he said, “The prices of seeds, fertilisers and other inputs have gone up. But the rates we get for our crop has been the same. Now if this report is implemented, the prices we will get will reduce further. How can things go on like this for us?”

Farmers from other states, too, voiced similar complaints against the Rangarajan committee report. “The recovery that farmers get in Maharashtra and south India is higher than what we get in Uttar Pradesh. In Maharasthra, farmers get about 10-12 percent in government-run mills but in UP, we get about 8-9 percent in private mills. Obviously we are at a loss here,” said Harvin Singh, a farmer from Hapur, Uttar Pradesh.

Addressing Prime Minister Manmohan Singh during the protest rally, VK Singh warned that if the report was considered and implemented in any of states that did not want it, the government would have to face the consequences. He said every farmer present at the rally would then bring 100 other farmers and protest at the Boat Club in the national capital.

“We are here to show our strength and say that we do not want the report,” he asserted, as cries of ‘Jai Jawan, Jai Kisan’ went up from the farmers assembled.

Comments

 

Other News

Stories you must read over the weekend

25 years of economic reforms You can see them around you all the time. They cut across geography, gender, caste, class, community and religion. Almost all of them have tell-tale signs – they are young, generally between 13 and 25 years; they own swanky smartphones; wea

Can’t you see that my beloved Kashmir bleeds

Burhan Wani was just like any other youngster who loved to spend time on the social media. But, there was a sinister, dark side to him. He joined the ranks of terrorists and became the Hizbul Mujahideen commander. He was killed on July 8, triggering violence that has savaged Kashmir for the past fortnight.

“India is now wide awake. We shall prevail. We shall overcome.”

THE DIAGNOSIS ‘At the edge of precipice’ 2. The new Government, which assumed office barely a month ago, inherited an economy in deep crisis. The balance of payments situation is precarious. ... There has been a sharp decline in capital

“We need leaders who will try to explain the logic [of reforms] to the people”

If there is one person from the bureaucracy who has made the biggest contribution in planning and implementing the economic reforms, it has to be Montek Singh Ahluwalia. Commerce secretary at the time of the 1991 budget, he has served in a wide gamut of positions since: economic affairs secretary, fina

“If I was not forced to present an interim budget I would’ve also made the same speech”

Yashwant Sinha has a critical role in the story of India’s economic reforms. It was he who was at the helm when the economy was in the worst crisis, keeping the vigil before the dawn of the reforms. In his second innings, it was again he who dispelled the speculations of the continuity of reforms

AAI mulling to revive Greenfield airport project

The Airports Authority of India (AAI) could hold talks with the Tamil Nadu government in an attempt to revive the plan for implementing the Sriperumbudur Greenfield airport in Chennai. The airport would spread over 4,800 acres and is estimated to cost Rs 20,000 crore. But according to a news report publish

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook    Twitter    Google Plus    Linkedin    Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter