If constable wasn’t ‘killed’, did top cop, media jump gun?

Is it regular for Delhi Police chief Neeraj Kumar to give out inexact/imprecise details, according to his own admission, in cases that should be, and subsequently is, under investigation? And why is media already veering off the protests?

shantanu

Shantanu Datta | December 26, 2012


At India Gate on Sunday: when the melee gave chance for a crackdown.
At India Gate on Sunday: when the melee gave chance for a crackdown.

Did the police lie about constable Subhash Tomar’s death, nay “murder”, to take life out of the anti-rape protests at India Gate?

Did the government insinuate the same to clear the Rajpath and Vijay Chowk, and by default cleanse its face of eggs that flew thick and fast over the last few days?

And did the media corroborate with both by zooming off completely the protests on Tuesday and not properly reporting in Wednesday’s papers the story of extreme police highhanded, in which a group of teenaged schoolgirls were detained illegally for hours at Parliament Street police station, roughed up in lock-up and warned against taking any further part in the protests?

It is sad that such questions should be asked a day after the Delhi Police constable’s funeral but these are questions that smack of a conspiracy, pardon the Mamata Banerjee-esque parlance.

If Delhi Police commissioner Neeraj Kumar did not know the details of constable Tomar’s death, why did he have to put in the claim in a televised media conference on Christmas day afternoon that “doctors have told us Tomar sustained internal injuries in his chest, neck and stomach that eventually resulted in his death"?

But in the same breath, he also said, "Only the postmortem report, which is awaited, can tell the exact cause of death."

So if what he said not the “exact cause of death”, what was he trying to do, giving out an imprecise cause of death to the whole nation?

According to reports in many sections of the media, including some news channels which on Tuesday stopped beaming the protests live from Jantar Mantar, Tomar might not have been “murdered”, as police’s FIR, changed after the constable’s death, asserts.

An ANI report quoted on firstpost.com says Dr PS Sidhu of Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital, where Tomar was admitted after collapsing at India gate on Sunday, has said the constable had “no major external injury marks when he was brought to the hospital” (read the updates/report here).

Dr Sidhu told Hindustan Times that though Tomar had a few broken ribs "that (ribcage fractures) could have happened when we were giving him CPR (cardio-pulmonary resuscitation)”.

A journalism student who claims to be a witness to Tomar’s “collapse” has also said, "He wasn't trampled by the protesters, he wasn't assaulted. He just collapsed while walking.”

Little wonder, then, that Delhi Police has transferred the investigation from its New Derlhi district to the Crime Branch.

So did the police speak with multiple “doctors”, as Neeraj Kumar put it, at RML? Did they get a different version than what Dr Sidhu has told the news agency? And is it a regular ritual for police chief Neeraj Kumar to hold media conferences and give out inexact/imprecise details (according to his own admission) in cases that should logically be under investigation? What was he, and the police, trying to achieve out of all this?

Just as, what were Delhi chief minister Sheila Dikshit and minister of state for home affairs RPN Singh doing at Tomar’s funeral when no minister visited RML hospital when the constable fought for his life in the ICU for nearly three days, as his son told news channels after his death?

And within hours of his death, what were the police on Parliament Street, with jurisdiction over areas that became suddenly inaccessible for the average citizens for three days, doing by arresting a bunch of teen girls? Are the police retaliating? If we go by their boss’s words (“collateral damage”, which is straight out of Army lexicon), were these girls collateral damage in constable Tomar’s death?

Were the cops out to avenge Tomar’s death? Or were they trying to scare the daylight of young people who even thought of protesting?

Lastly, what prompted this sudden media silence on this episode? This was not just a case of police highhandedness; it was, if events reported by a section of the media (and not the whole) are true, a case of crime. And the criminals were in uniform this time.

Are we all so intent on nipping the protests that we will stop reporting, and reacting, to general crime stories?

Comments

 

Other News

Gandhian movement after Gandhi failed: Ram Guha

The Gandhian movement in India, after Gandhi’s death, failed, says Ramachandra Guha, and blames Vinoba Bhave for it. But the movement found new, fertile grounds around the world and succeeded in bringing about a change in South Africa, the US and elsewhere. It is high time it returned home. Of cour

When religion, politics and Bollywood come together

Tavleen Singh, noted journalist and political commentator, has turned to fiction, with her debut novel ‘The Actor’ (HaperCollins India). Set in the near future, it has a superstar, Amit Singh, turning to politics, when the political landscape is dominated by prime minister Guru Gaynendraj

Cabinet approves setting up of Integrated Transport & Logistics Authority

The union cabinet, chaired by prime minister Narendra Modi, on Tuesday approved the setting up of a Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV), called Integrated Transport & Logistics Authority (ITLA), to strengthen research, planning, appraisal, monitoring and impact assessment within the broad domains of Transp

Why foundational literacy and numeracy is key to school education

Foundational Literacy and Numeracy (FLN) are often described as the building blocks of education. Yet, their significance goes well beyond a child’s ability to read a sentence, write a response or solve a basic mathematical problem. These foundational skills shape how children understand the world,

When police data becomes the algorithm

For decades, policing has followed a familiar sequence: a crime occurs, the police respond, an investigation produces records and those records become part of the institutional memory of the criminal justice system. Artificial intelligence is beginning to alter that sequence. Instead of merely recording

Before India voted, the framers worried about the referee

“We are making a Constitution forever and not only for today.” Shibban Lal Saksena said this in the Constituent Assembly on June 15, 1949. He was warning that a ruling party might one day choose a loyalist to run India’s elections. Seventy-seven years later, the Supreme Court is wrestli

Upcoming Conferences



-->

Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter