New NHAI norms for project bidding

Bars a developer if failed to achieve financial closure of three or more projects

GN Bureau | February 16, 2010



The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) has introduced new norms that bars a developer from bidding for new projects if the company has not been able to achieve financial closure of three or more projects, the Hindu Business Line reported on Tuesday.

The move will help prevent highway contractors and developers from bidding for more projects than what they can handle.

The companies likely to be hit by the move include HCC, IVRCL, KMC, IRB Infrastructure, Reliance Infrastructure and Sadbhav Engineering. They have won national highway projects in the last few months, with two-to-three awaiting financial closure, the report said.

“So, on any given day, in case a company has LoAs (Letter of Awards) for two projects for which it has not achieved financial closure, then it can bid for one more project,” the paper quoted an NHAI official as saying.

The new norms are expected to prevent aggressive bidding by some contractors who garner projects only to spruce up their order books, only to struggle later for funds, said another official.

“For one project, the best bidder has offered revenue share to the government, while the second best bidder has sought subsidy of over Rs.350 crore,” an unnamed source was quoted as saying.

In an amendment issued for several projects, whose bids are due February 19 onwards, NHAI has stated: “A bidder shall not be eligible for bidding if, as on bid due date, the bidder, its member or associate was, either by itself or as member of a consortium has been declared by the authority as the selected bidder for undertaking three or more projects and the bidder is yet to achieve financial closure. A bidder shall be considered as declared selected bidder for the projects of NHAI, where the letter of award (LoA) has been issued.”

The latest move is different from an earlier attempt to limit the number of bidders to the top four-five technically qualifying players, a move that was quashed.

Comments

 

Other News

“Practise ‘mental distancing’ to keep calm amid epidemic”

Half way through the year 2020, it has been a tough time all around the world: Covid-19 epidemic, loss of lives, economic hardships and also numerous other problems – natural disasters and political protests. Coming together, it all has mental health under immense strain. To discuss this and othe

Understanding immunity: How to boost it during Covid-19

In a first, the Department of Home Science, Sri Padmavati Mahila Visvavidayalam (Women’s University) Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, recently organized an international webinar on “Nutrition and Immune System Support during COVID-19 Pandemic”. Speakers included eminent national and internationa

Covid-19: India’s recovery rate improves to 59.43%

Even as Unlock enters the second phase, the number of Covid-19 infections continues to rise to record levels and India remains No 4 in the worldwide list, yet there is glimmer of hope: its recovery rate is also rising in tandem. There are 1,27,864 recovered cases more than the active Covid-1

Coming soon at a station near you: private trains!

A long-debated idea is finally coming to fruition as the Indian railways has decided to join hands with the private sector, in running some train services to begin with. The ministry of railways has invited ‘request for qualifications’ (RFQ) for private participation for operatio

A place of local democracy in pandemic governance: The case of Mumbai

Democracy in India is now taken for a fact, with an unstated assumption that all our institutions are democratic and hence often our successes and more often failures are attributed to ‘democracy’. However, a key frontier where democracy remains a challenge is that of local governments and that

Why TikTok, other apps were banned: “Engaged in anti-India activities”

India, facing China’s aggressiveness at border, has banned 59 smartphone apps, including TikTok, as they were indulging in activities harmful to India’s sovereignty and integrity. The reason cited was: “in view of information available they are engaged in activities which [



Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook    Twitter    Google Plus    Linkedin    Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter