On Pak front, time to talk tough now

In an interesting week, as tragedy revisits J&K few times over, New Delhi has never found a more opportune time, and backers, to make its voice heard against Pak-sponsored terrorism in Jammu and Kashmir

shantanu

Shantanu Datta | October 24, 2013



As BJP and its prime ministerial candidate Narendra Modi take the Congress over its government’s purported kid-glove treatment of terror in the run-up to elections, especially of the variety emanating from Pakistan, the autumn in the calendar year could well mean spring season for the centre’s Pakistan policy. If it wants to, that is.

For starters, the setting could not be more perfect despite the renewed ceasefire violations by Pakistan along the Line of Control (LoC) in Jammu and Kashmir and fears of a violent winter in the state with renewed infiltration attempts before the chill sets in. Sample these events this week:

* On Monday (October 21), Omar Abdullah made what can only be construed the strongest anti-Pakistan statement by a political leader from the Valley. Asserting that India would "respond in kind" if the repeated ceasefire violations persist, Omar said: "This cannot be a one-sided affair. It cannot be a situation where we are at the receiving end and no response is given.”

* Though he clarified that “wars are no solution to any issue” at a public rally two days later at Tangdhar (Karnah), a town bordering Pakistan in Kupwara district, Omar added, with a not-that-veiled reference to Pakistan: “Friendship is like the clap, needing two hands.... If one side extends the hand of friendship, the other side also needs to reciprocate.” * As Pakistani troops continued their shelling across the LoC on Monday, it was still Sunday some 11,000 km way in Washington when Pakistan prime minister Nawaz Sharif arrived for his official state visit after assuming charge. Responding to Sharif’s comments during a stopover in London en route to Washington – to the effect that though India does not want it, world powers should get involved in resolving the Kashmir issue, hours before his meeting with US president Barack Obama – a senior US administration officer said, "On Kashmir, our policy has not changed an iota.” Encouraging dialogue between the neighbours, the official said, "The pace, scope, and character of India and Pakistan's dialogue on Kashmir is for those two countries to determine with each other."

https://mail.google.com/mail/u/1/images/cleardot.gif* Within hours of that statement, India issued a joint statement with Russia, after prime minister Manmohan Singh’s longer-than-expected meeting with Russia’s president Vladimir Putin, that indicted Pakistan-sponsored terrorism, without naming the neighbour.

* On October 23, even as Nawaz Sharif remarked while addressing a Washington think-tank that “with its growing influence in India, the US has the capacity to do more to help the two sides resolve their core disputes, including Kashmir”, foreign secretary Sujatha Singh told the media in Beijing, following talks between Manmohan Singh and his Chinese counterpart Li Keqiang, that India raised the question of cross-border terrorism emanating from Pakistan.

While all these are interesting developments unto themselves, taken into account as a series that comes at a time of renewed cross-border firing and reported attempts at infiltration, they constitute more than a cursory message: that New Delhi can think of talking tough with Islamabad. While peace and dialogue should never be given a go-by, as Omar Abdullah said on October 23, what the UPA government needs to understand is that it has never perhaps had more support in thinking of reciprocating in other ways, as Omar had said on October 21.

Yes, there are chances of a bitter harvest to be had while toeing that line – as both moderate and hardline faction of the Hurriyat Conference’s criticism of Omar Abdullah’s attempt at seeking “other options” bear out. But what Messrs Manmohan Singh and home minister Sushilkumar Shinde – who made strong remarks during his October 22 visit to Samba district, where 12 people, including three militants, died in a terrorist attack on September 26 – should understand is that New delhi never had so many allies ready to okay a tough stand, if ceasefire violations continue, in a long time.

There have already been more than 150 such violations so far this year – the most in recent memory – and while it might not stop immediately, chances are they will only increase in number, and casualty, unless India takes a stand. A tough stand, for a change.

Comments

 

Other News

From one cow to a dairy business

In 2012, Anita Dash wasn`t dreaming of building a dairy brand. She wasn`t studying business models or planning market expansion. Like countless mothers across India, her focus was on something much simpler: giving her children a better future.   At the time, her most valuable

Ethanol blending: The two sides of a story

India`s crude oil consumption is estimated to be around 88.5% imported from abroad. This one single figure is also responsible for why ethanol has become both an economic strategy and fuel policy at the same time. In an economy like India, which depends so heavily on foreign oil, any increase in internat

Food inflation: Not a macroeconomic statistic but a developmental indicator

India`s retail inflation shows a reassuring picture at first glance. According to the latest data, Consumer Price Index (CPI) inflation edged up to 4.38% in June 2026 from 3.93% in May 2026, but continued to remain within the Reserve Bank of India`s (RBI) target band of 4% (+/- 2%). However, beneath this

Skin in the game or masterful market timing?

When a company founder opens their personal chequebook to buy shares in their own business, stock markets usually applaud. To the average retail investor, it feels like the ultimate vote of confidence, a sign that the people running the show have real skin in the game and believe brighter days are ahead.

India’s freedom struggle was shaped by wider Asian political thought

As we mark 80th anniversary of independence, ‘Asianism and the Fall of Empire’ (HarperCollins India) by historian Mithi Mukherjee offers a new perspective on Ind

What is colonialism? A relook at modern history

The Chromatic World Order: The Fiction That Rules Our World  By Sajid Mohamed Aakar Books  

Upcoming Conferences



-->

Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter