Rape crime is not negotiable, say lawyers on bail for TN rapist

Madras HC judge’s order of mediation in rape case blasted by activists and lawyers

shivani

Shivani Chaturvedi | June 26, 2015


#madras   #high court   #rape   #rapist   #mediation   #devadass   #women  

Lawyers and women's rights activists have termed the order as unacceptable and shocking. These are public reactions against the controversial order of justice P Devadass of the Madras high court in a rape case. Early this week justice Devadass accepted the bail of a rapist and directed him to mediate with his victim.

Advocate Ajtha of Madras high court says, "It is a complete injustice in the particular case. The case is not in a position to come to table for mediation. This order only shows inefficiency of courts."

"Article 14, which says, equality before law and that all people should be treated equally, is not unknown to this judge. Would this judge given the same statement had the victim been from any rich or influential family?" she asks.

When it comes to poor people, judges' verdicts are different, the advocate said.

"Rape is an inexcusable crime. It is not an offence that can be negotiated away,” said senior advocate and rights activist Sudha Ramalingam.

“Unfortunately, there have been several instances through the years where the courts have tried to mediate and find 'solutions' including marriage of the victim to the rapist, or compensation to the victim, in lieu of imprisonment. Criminal law regards rape as a serious offence and does not allow for compounding, i.e. withdrawal of the case by the victim," Sudha said.

The Madras high court has again recommended alternate dispute resolution (ADR) in a case of rape. The decision of justice Devadoss appears to endorse negotiation, or mediation in case of rape. In his judgment, he states that the true victim of the crime is actually the child that the victim gave birth to. Therefore, the court has suggested that through alternate dispute resolution, the accused and the victim find an amicable solution which would then be used to mitigate the sentence of imprisonment. For this reason, the court had released the accused on bail, she adds.

ADR is only suitable for civil cases where essential rights of individuals are not at stake, Sudha says. Serious offences such as rape are not amenable to plea bargaining, or compounding. Whilst so, referring this case to mediation sets a dangerous and undesirable precedent.

It must be remembered that crimes against women were, until recently, regarded as taboo topics, never to be discussed in public or even dealt with seriously. Looking at them through the lens of shame rather than rights had resulted in serious underreporting and also witnesses (including survivor of crime herself) turning hostile resulting in acquittals. It has been a long uphill battle to raise awareness and sensitise the public as to the seriousness and scale of violence against women. Given this history, it is regressive to endorse ADR in case of rape as it appears to trivialize the underlying offence, she said.

Comments

 

Other News

From Shah Bano to Shayara Bano: How Rajiv’s blunder undid secularism

History could have repeated itself as a farce, but in the triple talaq case today, there has been no replay. A historic blunder has been undone, though it has taken three decades. The supreme court has once again taken a stance in favour of individual freedom and against fundamentalism &nda

Train passengers die as rail safety panel recommendations gather dust

 The derailment of Puri-Haridwar Kalinga Utkal express at Khatauli has once again raised serious questions on the railways’ safety claims. At least 21 people were killed and many were injured. The derailments over a period of a few months are giving sleepless nights to the top railway.

Political parties support triple talaq verdict

The BJP as well as the Congress welcomed the supreme court judgment that bars instant triple talaq for a period of six months and also seeks a legislation on it.   BJP chief Amit Shah said that he welcomes this on behalf of the party and added “it’s not about anyo

5 judges, 5 faiths, 1 verdict

Five judges from five different faiths deliberated upon and decided that instant triple talaq is to be struck down for a period of six months and the government should bring a legislation over it.   The supreme court bench was headed by chief justice of India J S Khehar, who

REC, PFC didn’t conduct appropriate due diligence: CAG

Rural Electrification Corporation Limited (REC) and Power Finance Corporation Limited (PFC) did not conduct appropriate due diligence during credit appraisal in power generation projects and in the process assumed higher risks on the loan accounts, noted the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) in a rep

Triple talaq verdict historic, says Modi

Prime minister Narendra Modi described as “historic” the supreme court judgment that struck down triple talaq for a period of six months.   “Judgment of the Hon`ble SC on Triple Talaq is historic. It grants equality to Muslim women and is a powerful measure



Video

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook    Twitter    Google Plus    Linkedin    Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter