Supreme court refuses to disqualify tainted ministers

A five-judge bench headed by chief justice of India said it is leaving the decision to the “prime minister's wisdom”.

GN Bureau | August 27, 2014



The supreme court (SC) on Wednesday said it cannot not disqualify tainted ministers in the union and state cabinets with criminal cases against them.

Disposing off a 2005 PIL seeking removal of the then four chargesheeted ministers in Manmohan Singh-led  UPA  cabinet — Lalu Prasad, Mohammed Taslimuddin, M.A.A. Fatmi and Jai Prakash Yadav – a five judge bench headed by chief justice of India RM Lodha said it is leaving the decision to the “Prime Minister's wisdom”.

“Article 75 of the constitution does not contain any limitation as to who can or cannot be included in the council of ministers,” the bench said.

The centre had in its reply pointed to article 75 only underlining further that it is the cabinet’s prerogative to drop a minister. “Once a person is an MP, he is entitled to be in the council of ministers, if the prime minister decides,” the centre had submitted.

SC bench, however, pointed in its judgment that “Constitution reposes immense trust in the PM and chief ministers and they are expected to act with responsibility and with constitutional morality.”

The bench further raised: “whether a person who has come in conflict with law would be in a position to conscientiously discharge his functions as minister when his integrity is questioned and whether a person with doubtful integrity can be given the responsibility.”

There are 14 ministers in the Modi government, who have criminal cases against them including, murder, rioting and corruption. Among them, senior BJP leaders Nitin Gadkari and Uma Bharti, both part of the Modi cabinet have criminal cases against them.

In 2013, SC had ruled that MPs and MLAs shall be disqualified if convicted by a court and sentenced to two years imprisonment or more.

Comments

 

Other News

Five years after Nirbhaya: A lot needs to be done

Have things changed five years after the Nirbhaya incident? I see Delhi as the capital of protest, not just capital of rape as it is often painted. In terms of legislation, in 2013 one-stop-centres were set up after the landmark report of Justice Verma Committee and Justice Usha

Winter session will be productive: Modi

The winter session of parliament is starting and I am confident that it will be productive session, said prime minister Narendra Modi on Friday. He hoped that there is “constructive debate and we come up with innovative solutions to our nation`s problems”. Speaking

Know more about Project 75

When prime minister Narendra Modi dedicated Kalvari submarine to the nation, it was significant for more than one reason. Not only did the submarine enhance India’s capability as a blue water navy, it also highlighted Project 75 that focused on a major exercise to build six submarines.

Deadline for linking Aadhaar with services extended till March 31

 A five judge constitution bench of the Supreme Court in its interim ruling on Friday has fixed the deadline for linking Aadhaar with services including mobile numbers as March 31, 2018.   This excludes opening up of new bank accounts for those already having  Aadhaar. For tho

The fairy-tale thriller

Assembly elections in Gujarat, since 2002, have been like Churchill’s description of Russia – with a little twist: wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma, but eventually a non-riddle. They have been following the same script. When the campaign begins, the outcome looks utterly un

Ascent and dissent

Rahul Gandhi has become the president of India’s grand old party. Nobody else wanted to, since none contested. By any parameter, it is not a welcome move in a democracy. Regardless of your views on his leadership abilities, the fact remains that there was no contest, no election for the top post. The



Video

National Medical Commission will replace Medical council of India

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook    Twitter    Google Plus    Linkedin    Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter