Supreme court refuses to disqualify tainted ministers

A five-judge bench headed by chief justice of India said it is leaving the decision to the “prime minister's wisdom”.

GN Bureau | August 27, 2014



The supreme court (SC) on Wednesday said it cannot not disqualify tainted ministers in the union and state cabinets with criminal cases against them.

Disposing off a 2005 PIL seeking removal of the then four chargesheeted ministers in Manmohan Singh-led  UPA  cabinet — Lalu Prasad, Mohammed Taslimuddin, M.A.A. Fatmi and Jai Prakash Yadav – a five judge bench headed by chief justice of India RM Lodha said it is leaving the decision to the “Prime Minister's wisdom”.

“Article 75 of the constitution does not contain any limitation as to who can or cannot be included in the council of ministers,” the bench said.

The centre had in its reply pointed to article 75 only underlining further that it is the cabinet’s prerogative to drop a minister. “Once a person is an MP, he is entitled to be in the council of ministers, if the prime minister decides,” the centre had submitted.

SC bench, however, pointed in its judgment that “Constitution reposes immense trust in the PM and chief ministers and they are expected to act with responsibility and with constitutional morality.”

The bench further raised: “whether a person who has come in conflict with law would be in a position to conscientiously discharge his functions as minister when his integrity is questioned and whether a person with doubtful integrity can be given the responsibility.”

There are 14 ministers in the Modi government, who have criminal cases against them including, murder, rioting and corruption. Among them, senior BJP leaders Nitin Gadkari and Uma Bharti, both part of the Modi cabinet have criminal cases against them.

In 2013, SC had ruled that MPs and MLAs shall be disqualified if convicted by a court and sentenced to two years imprisonment or more.

Comments

 

Other News

From Shah Bano to Shayara Bano: How Rajiv’s blunder undid secularism

History could have repeated itself as a farce, but in the triple talaq case today, there has been no replay. A historic blunder has been undone, though it has taken three decades. The supreme court has once again taken a stance in favour of individual freedom and against fundamentalism &nda

Train passengers die as rail safety panel recommendations gather dust

 The derailment of Puri-Haridwar Kalinga Utkal express at Khatauli has once again raised serious questions on the railways’ safety claims. At least 21 people were killed and many were injured. The derailments over a period of a few months are giving sleepless nights to the top railway.

Political parties support triple talaq verdict

The BJP as well as the Congress welcomed the supreme court judgment that bars instant triple talaq for a period of six months and also seeks a legislation on it.   BJP chief Amit Shah said that he welcomes this on behalf of the party and added “it’s not about anyo

5 judges, 5 faiths, 1 verdict

Five judges from five different faiths deliberated upon and decided that instant triple talaq is to be struck down for a period of six months and the government should bring a legislation over it.   The supreme court bench was headed by chief justice of India J S Khehar, who

REC, PFC didn’t conduct appropriate due diligence: CAG

Rural Electrification Corporation Limited (REC) and Power Finance Corporation Limited (PFC) did not conduct appropriate due diligence during credit appraisal in power generation projects and in the process assumed higher risks on the loan accounts, noted the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) in a rep

Triple talaq verdict historic, says Modi

Prime minister Narendra Modi described as “historic” the supreme court judgment that struck down triple talaq for a period of six months.   “Judgment of the Hon`ble SC on Triple Talaq is historic. It grants equality to Muslim women and is a powerful measure



Video

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook    Twitter    Google Plus    Linkedin    Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter