Supreme court refuses to disqualify tainted ministers

A five-judge bench headed by chief justice of India said it is leaving the decision to the “prime minister's wisdom”.

GN Bureau | August 27, 2014



The supreme court (SC) on Wednesday said it cannot not disqualify tainted ministers in the union and state cabinets with criminal cases against them.

Disposing off a 2005 PIL seeking removal of the then four chargesheeted ministers in Manmohan Singh-led  UPA  cabinet — Lalu Prasad, Mohammed Taslimuddin, M.A.A. Fatmi and Jai Prakash Yadav – a five judge bench headed by chief justice of India RM Lodha said it is leaving the decision to the “Prime Minister's wisdom”.

“Article 75 of the constitution does not contain any limitation as to who can or cannot be included in the council of ministers,” the bench said.

The centre had in its reply pointed to article 75 only underlining further that it is the cabinet’s prerogative to drop a minister. “Once a person is an MP, he is entitled to be in the council of ministers, if the prime minister decides,” the centre had submitted.

SC bench, however, pointed in its judgment that “Constitution reposes immense trust in the PM and chief ministers and they are expected to act with responsibility and with constitutional morality.”

The bench further raised: “whether a person who has come in conflict with law would be in a position to conscientiously discharge his functions as minister when his integrity is questioned and whether a person with doubtful integrity can be given the responsibility.”

There are 14 ministers in the Modi government, who have criminal cases against them including, murder, rioting and corruption. Among them, senior BJP leaders Nitin Gadkari and Uma Bharti, both part of the Modi cabinet have criminal cases against them.

In 2013, SC had ruled that MPs and MLAs shall be disqualified if convicted by a court and sentenced to two years imprisonment or more.

Comments

 

Other News

Skin in the game or masterful market timing?

When a company founder opens their personal chequebook to buy shares in their own business, stock markets usually applaud. To the average retail investor, it feels like the ultimate vote of confidence, a sign that the people running the show have real skin in the game and believe brighter days are ahead.

India’s freedom struggle was shaped by wider Asian political thought

As we mark 80th anniversary of independence, ‘Asianism and the Fall of Empire’ (HarperCollins India) by historian Mithi Mukherjee offers a new perspective on Ind

What is colonialism? A relook at modern history

The Chromatic World Order: The Fiction That Rules Our World  By Sajid Mohamed Aakar Books  

Monsoon session of parliament adjourns sine die

The Monsoon Session, 2026 of Parliament which commenced on July 20 was adjourned sine die on Thursday. The session provided 19 sittings spread over a period of 25 days.   During the session 11 Bills were introduced in Lok Sabha and 2 Bills were introduced in Rajya Sabha. 12 B

Consumer Justice at a Crossroads

Over the past four decades, India`s consumer protection landscape has undergone a remarkable transformation. What began with the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 as a simple mechanism to empower ordinary citizens has evolved into a comprehensive framework capable of addressing challenges ranging from mislea

Doctors, experts call for ban on junk food ads, mandate warning labels

More than 30 doctors, medical scientists and public health professionals have urged the government to take decisive action against the aggressive advertising and marketing of junk food, calling for a watershed ban on advertisements for foods high in fat, sugar and salt (HFSS) and ultra-processed foods (UPF

Upcoming Conferences



-->

Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter