Pak terrorist may walk free again due to possible Pak govt’s complicity
GN Bureau | December 30, 2014
Was Pakistan fooling India when it slapped Maintenance of Public Order (MPO) against Zakiur Rehman Lakhvi, the key planner of the 2008 Mumbai terror attacks?
The Islamabad High Court issued an interim order to release Lakhvi. The orders, issued by Justice Noor ul Haq Qureshi, said that the Pakistan government's detention order against Lakhvi was illegal because he had been granted bail by an anti-terror court and the anti-terror court's decision could not be quashed by a regular court.
During Monday’s hearing, Lakhvi’s counsel Rizwan Abbasi said that the court had previously accepted his client’s bail, but it was the administration that had detained him which was unlawful. He said that grant of bail was an issue of fundamental rights.
The law is clear but it seems that the Pakistani government scripted a drama of MPO against Lakhvi and buy time as India had lodged strong protest at the manner in which Lakhvi was granted bail.
A question that needs to be asked is did Pakistani government know about the supremacy of the anti-terror law and its court? If the government lawyer knew about this anti-terror court order superseding ordinary court law then why did the administration detain Lakhvi under MPO?
Islamabad Anti-Terrorism Court Judge Zaidi on December 18 had granted bail to Lakhvi in the Mumbai attack case citing lack of evidence against him, but before he could be released from jail, the government detained him for three more months under MPO.
The Pakistan government had even promised to file a plea challenging Lakhvi's bail but failed to do so as it could not get a copy of the anti-terrorism court's order. Lakhvi had also submitted an application seeking an end to his detention.
Meanwhile, Lakhvi is set to walk free from the Adiala Jail on Tuesday, despite strong protests lodged by the Indian government in this regard. The Indian government had on Monday summoned the Pakistani envoy in Delhi to ‘convey concern’ over the conditional release of Lakhvi.
Lakhvi is facing the charges of imparting training and giving instructions to the 10 terrorists who carried out the attacks in India's financial capital, leaving 166 people dead. Lakhvi, who was the operations commander of the Lashkar-e-Taiba, was charged along with six others in 2009 in the Mumbai attack case. Ajmal Kasab and David Headley had identified Lakhvi as the operations mastermind for the 26/11 terror attack.
Every year since 2000, February 21 is observed as International Mother Language Day by United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation (UNESCO). It is to celebrate linguistic and cultural diversity, and multilingualism.
Indian women marrying NRIs, glamorous though it sounds, has recently become a cause of serious concern. The reason for this is the alarmingly high rates of desertion of women marrying NRIs, said a blog posted on the Niti Aayog website. The blog ‘NRI: Non Reliabl
CBI is supposed to be the last resort to catch the corrupt after all other options have not yielded the desired result. But, who will now tackle corruption now that two of the former top officials of the premier investigating agency are themselves facing charges. India is s
Post demonetisation, what are the challenges faced by banks? Post demonetisation, the major challenges are retention of CASA [current account, savings account] deposits, deployment of these funds, impact of spurt/decline in low-cost deposits on MCLR [marginal cost of fund
9.44 The irresistible force of even as powerful an idea as UBI will run into the immovable object of a resistant, pesky reality. So, what is the way forward, always remembering that the yardstick for assessment is not whether UBI can be perfect or faultless but only whether it can impr
Should action be taken against hospitals which have hiked the heart surgery cost?