Ministry of external affairs headed by Sushma Swaraj has declined information about Lalit Modi’s passport
GN Bureau | June 29, 2015
Lalit Modi show is running like a Indian serials on televisions, long and tedious with same repetitive dialogues. Now, this week’s episodes may focus on a RTI query. The ministry of external affairs (MEA) headed by Sushma Swaraj has declined to provide information about Lalit Modi’s passport.
Seven questions were asked in the RTI application filed a person from Haryana. The ministry said, while a part of the queries did not come under the purview of the transparency law, it pleaded lack of information regarding other questions.
The questions included one about who had taken a decision not to appeal in the supreme court against the Delhi high court's decision to restore Modi's passport. "Kindly note that the office of External Affairs Minister (EAM) has informed that the questions in Serial 1 to 3 of your RTI does not seem to fall under the purview of the RTI act, 2005. As regards to queries Sl No 4 to 7, no information is available with EAMs office," the MEA said in its reply dated June 26.
For further action the ministry has sent the application to its consular, passport and visa division as well as to the ministries of home and finance.
The questions were why Swaraj did not advise Modi to apply for a temporary travel document to the Indian High Commission in London.It also asked why the minister did not insist on Modi’s return to India as a condition for issuing a temporary Indian travel document.
The RTI query sought to know whether the government has lodged any objections to UK for granting residency permit to Modi (he has refused to appear before the Enforcement Directorate) and what steps the government has taken on fresh passport and to enforce the ED summons.
It asked who took the decision not to file an appeal in the supreme court against Delhi High Court’s ruling setting aside cancellation of Modi’s passport. It asked whether the ED, at whose instance the passport was cancelled, was consulted on the issue.
The MEA's response has attracted the Opposition onslaught. The Congress said the action of the EAM is against the spirit of RTI Act.
Senior Congress leader PC Chacko said this is against the spirit of the RTI Act. "In fact, any private information need not be disclosed but here is a case which is affecting even the security of the country also and person who is fugitive, who is an absconder, against whom there is an inquiry going on... and when information is sought on that, it simply cannot be treated as a private matter," Chacko added.
CPI(M)’s Brinda Karat said it was “more than just stonewalling”.
However, BJP spokesperson Nalin Kohli says there is a process about RTI and there are certain rules which are followed. "If it is about specifics, the concerned officers would be the right people to ask," he said.
The Aam Aadmi Party (AAP), for all its talk of high ideals, had an image problem right from its inception: that it was a motley crew of politically naïve people. When the going was good, this image came very handy. Arvind Kejriwal and Co. were seen as a fresh new alternative to the usual run-of-the-mi
Prime minister Narendra Modi and defence minister Nirmala Sitharaman are in the midst of one direct attack, one insidious insinuation and a special kind of offensive. These concerted actions have emerged after both firmly showed their hand and spoke their mind on going down the indigenous path for most o
While the centre has encouraged drug stores that sell generics (as opposed to branded medicines) under the Jan Aushadhi scheme, states have obtained mixed results in the implementation. In Andhra Pradesh, for instance, there are few stores selling generics, but they are unique in that they are run by all-w
A top Reserve Bank of India official had waved the red flag, a year back, regarding the SWIFT messaging system. SWIFT was used in a fraud amounting to Rs 11,000 crore at a Punjab National Bank branch that benefited billionaire diamond jeweler Nirav Modi. Former RBI deputy gover
Delhi chief secretary Anshu Prakash’s claim that he was manhandled by Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) lawmakers in the presence of Delhi chief minister Arvind Kejriwal has kicked up a storm. Here is what transpired on Monday night and the events that unfolded through Tuesday.
Is banks` messaging system SWIFT secure enough?