Urban governance: 25 years after the constitutional amendment, it’s high time states delegated due powers to urban bodies
Harshil Suresh and Milind Mhaske | March 13, 2020
Importance of strengthening city governance
Cities in India contribute to about 60% of the economic output of the country, acting as the engines of economic growth [World Bank. (2020). Urbanization in India. Online available at: https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/feature/2011/09/22/india-urbanization Accessed 9 Mar. 2020]. These engines need to be run efficiently to have greater positive impact on economic growth of the country. Therefore, specific focus is required to develop the cities, thereby creating a positive impact on life of the booming urban population in the country. City governments (municipal corporations, municipal councils and nagar panchayats) in the country were constituted through the 74th Constitutional Amendment Act, 1993 (74th CAA) [2020. The Constitution (74Th Amendment) Act, 1992. [ebook] Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs, Govt. of India. Available at: http://mohua.gov.in/upload/uploadfiles/files/74th_CAA13.pdf ], forming the third tier of government responsible for effective municipal governance and functioning of cities. It is essential that city governments hold the control, powers and authorities to perform functions that are fundamental to achieve sustainable urban development and fulfilment of the basic needs of an urban citizen.
Lack of control over urban functions under city governments
This leads one to probe questions such as why our cities are so poorly managed and not being able to deliver basic services efficiently, or what functions are performed by the city governments across the country on ground.
Figure: Distribution of 18 functions in terms of control
Figure: Distribution of 18 functions in terms of control
Source: Praja Foundation’s National Consultation Report – Key Findings from 21 States
Praja Foundation’s Urban Governance Reforms Study [Praja.org. (2020). Online available at: https://praja.org/praja_docs/praja_downloads/National%20Consultation%20On%20Urban%20Governance-%20Key%20Finding%20From%2021%20States.pdf Accessed 5 Mar. 2020] on 21 cities involved mapping of 18 functions under the Twelfth Schedule [Anon, (2020). [ebook] Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs, Govt. of India, p.356. Available at: https://www.india.gov.in/sites/upload_files/npi/files/coi-eng-schedules_1-12.pdf Accessed 9 Mar. 2020] inserted in the 74th CAA and gives us a picture of the scenario on ground. The findings show that 13 out of the 21 cities have independent control over only 5 or less than 5 functions, among which cities such as Lucknow, Raipur and Dehradun which are capitals of their respective states have independent control over just 1 or 2 functions. Most city governments in the country independently control only minor functions such as services of registering births and deaths, building and maintenance of crematoriums etc., and the only large scale function which is dominantly controlled is solid waste management (SWM). Primary urban functions such as urban planning, construction and maintenance of urban infrastructure such as water supply, sewerage, storm water drains, roads and bridges etc., are not directly controlled by the city governments. It is of utmost importance for such urban functions to be controlled by a decentralised self-governing entity at the city level to achieve better planning and execution of projects in the city. This indicates that city governments need to be entrusted with independent control over functions that are vital for city development.
Issue of multiple agencies operating in the city
Having talked about independent control, most of the functions in reality are actually handled by multiple agencies that operate within the city. This is justified by the Praja’s study as remarked earlier where the findings also show that all the 21 cities studied experience involvement of multiple agencies in 7 functions out of the 18 functions at the least. We see roads that are dug up, footpaths that are broken and roads getting flooded immediately with just light showers in our cities most of the time. This is a result of multiple agencies such as specialized bodies set up by the state government, State government departments and city government involved over overlapping functions. In the city of Panaji, Goa, the function of roads is under the control of public works department (PWD), the functions of water supply and sanitation is controlled by the public health and engineering department (PHED) and function of street lighting is under the control of Corporation of City of Panaji (CCP). This multiplicity of control under multiple agencies is the cause of the chaos we see pertaining to urban infrastructure in our cities. Unfortunately, the story is the same across cities in the country. This points out the crucial need for cities to have autonomous control over these urban functions to eliminate such issues prevailing in the cities due to the presence of multiple agencies.
Multiple agencies and their lack of accountability
As mentioned earlier, multiple agencies also include specialized bodies set up by the state government. These are the agencies of the state government which hold expertise on a specific dedicated function or are constituted for a particular purpose. Such agencies exist in most of the cities today operating on functions such as urban planning, water supply etc., or to implement various state government and central government schemes and or missions in urban areas. For example, in Delhi, the Delhi Jal Board (DJB) which looks after the function of water supply and sewerage for the entire city, while Karnataka has constituted Karnataka Urban Infrastructure Development and Finance Corporation (KUIDFC) to implement state government infrastructure development schemes in urban areas of the state. The constitution of such agencies can be considered a bypass of the 74th CAA in the first place. However, the main issue lies in the accountability of such agencies towards the citizens. These agencies lack provisions of legislative structure wherein elected representatives have key role to play and hence there are no platforms where citizens voice are represented. Whereas, city government has legislative wings with elected representatives representing citizen’s voice in the council meetings, and various committees constituted in the structure. Hence, the point to be taken here is that specialised agencies are less likely to be answerable to the citizens of the city. Therefore, it is imperative to reiterate that city governments need to be empowered with independent controls over all vital urban functions. However, city governments may hand over execution of projects or schemes under these functions to specialised agencies in cases as per requirement, by acting as an empowered self-governing nodal agency in the city.
Lack of powers and authorities with city governments
But, the other problem to this story is that even in the case of cities where functions have been transferred to the city governments, the corresponding powers and authorities to perform these functions have not been devolved by state government. Praja’s study reveals that most city governments lack the powers to raise their own resources in terms of funds and functionaries. Findings from the study show that 16 out of the 21 cities studied lack the authority to recruit human resources. These city governments are dependent on the state government for approval on all types of recruitment. This unfortunately is leading to many vacancies of posts in the city governments across the country. This primarily creates a roadblock for city governments from delivering efficient services and execution of projects in the cities. Hence, it is important that city governments hold powers and authority to raise revenues and recruit human resources on its own.
Need for building capacity of city governments
The common argument one would come across on this subject is that city governments cannot be given responsibility over major functions because it lacks the necessary capacity to plan, finance and operate projects and ensure service delivery. The counter to this is that city governments have been constituted for the purpose of urban local self-governance. Therefore, the onus is on the state government to transfer powers and authorities to city government to enable effective implementation of projects and service delivery at the city level. To add to this, state governments need to ensure mandatory and regular capacity building trainings are conducted for the officials and elected representatives of the city government. This will ensure upgradation of technical skills, awareness of the duties, responsibilities and equipping with latest domain knowledge and skills. These interventions as a whole can ensure improvement of capacity and thereby boost performance delivered by the city governments.
Road ahead to achieve sustainable urban development
It has been more than 25 years since 74th CAA came into force, which aimed at strengthening urban local governance in the country through constitution of city governments. Yet, it is quite clear that city governments still face a sorry state of affairs. It is high time that city governments are entrusted with independent control over all vital urban functions that need to be planned and executed at the city level. City governments need to hold powers to entrust execution of projects or schemes to the specialised agencies considering the matters such as current lack of capacity. City governments need to function as independent self-governing nodal agencies among the multiple specialised agencies operating within the city. State governments need to handhold the city governments with powers and authorities to boost efficiency in performance of functions and conduct capacity building initiatives to upgrade technical skills, spread awareness and equip with latest technology and know-how. All of these reforms are required to set a strong foundation to run the engines of economic growth efficiently and achieve sustainable urban development in the country.
The authors are with the Praja Foundation, Mumbai.
With Lockdown 4 ending Sunday, the home ministry has issued new guidelines to fight COVID-19 and for phased re-opening of areas outside the Containment Zones. The guidelines, issued based on extensive consultations held with states and UTs, will be effective from June 1 till June 30. The first phase of reo
When the whole world is fighting COVID-19, food and nutrition security has become a major issue. The pandemic has aggravated the existing food crisis in India, especially in rural and tribal regions. There has been less availability of fresh foods in most parts of the country, and the tribal community has
India is determined to “set an example” for the rest of the word in the post-pandemic economic revival, prime minister Narendra Modi has said, underling the need to become self-reliant. “There is also a widespread debate on how the economies of various countries, including
Close to 48 lakh migrant labourers have been able to reach home from the cities they were working in, as the Indian Railways have run a total of 3,543 “Sharmik Special” trains from May 1. Following the home ministry order regarding the movement by special trains of migrant worker
Before the novel coronavirus hit it, Mumbai about 10-12 lakh labourers from elsewhere had made it their home. The figure for the state of Maharashtra was another 18-20 lakh. As the pandemic spread and the Maximum City emerged as the worst-hit place in India, all economic activities came to an end, and with
For the rest of the world, it is not easy to understand China when it comes to politics or economics. Under pressure from the international community, it has accepted to open the country for a “comprehensive” probe into the origin of the deadly coronavirus. But it is not clear whether the Asian