• About Us
  • Feedback
  • Events Calendar
  • Archives
  • Newsletter
Advanced Search
  • Home
  • News
  • Views
  • GovNow
  • GovNext
  • Login
  • Register
News
  • Top Stories
  • Public Reporter
  • Photo Story
  • Protests & Petitions
  • GNtv
Views
  • Day's Debate
  • Columns
  • Think Tank
  • Interview
  • GNtalk
  • Backstory
GovNow
  • Parliament
  • Your MP
  • Bureaucracy
  • Judiciary
  • Policy
GovNext
  • RTI
  • eGov
  • GreenGov
  • GovPitch
Follow Us
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS
Home › Views › Columns › Deviously defined democracy

Deviously defined democracy

UPA thinks that banning protests at Jantar Mantar will muffle disaffected citizens
Sarthak Ray | August 09 2011

Author Profile

sarthak's picture
Sarthak Ray

Share

You can’t grab protest realty. That is UPA’s holier-than-thou rejoinder to Team Hazare’s request for permission for a month-long protest in support of the Jan Lokpal bill at Jantar Mantar. Delhi Police, in its letter to the protesters, said that no single organisation can be allowed to usurp and lay exclusive claim to the top protest hub.

Now, there may be as many issues needing demonstrations as there are Indians, but nothing seems more pressing than the aam aadmi’s frustration with corruption. When the squeeze is so total, it is only rational that the need for space for outcry has to be commensurate. So, is it unfair of Team Anna to have asked for Jantar Mantar for a month?

As a government representative on the joint drafting committee, Kapil Sibal had, more than once, called Team Hazare “unelected executives”. One can only hope that the referendum in which 85 percent of almost 1.5 lakh people of his Lok Sabha constituency, Chandni Chowk, overwhelmingly ‘voted’ in favour of the Jan Lokpal broadened his idea of democracy to something beyond electoral victories. “Unelected executives”, by the way, was a phrase commonly passed on to scribes by Congress spokespersons at press briefings on Lokpal when the joint drafting committee was at work.

The government’s democratisation spin smacks of intolerance for a dissenting note, in this case, for a stronger Lokpal bill than its own draft. The government fears the crowd of disaffected citizens will get thicker and louder than the one that assembled in April. But UPA’s salvation does not lie in banning the protest. In fact, the move betrays a crisis of confidence within the government. If the government thought its Lokpal draft was the sabre-tooth needed to check corruption, it would have let hecklers do their bit and leave. It, however, is consciously shutting out citizens’ cry for effective measures against corruption.

Here is a popularly elected government, happily democratic in ensuring equitable access to a whining podium for all, but stolidly autocratic about what it will listen to.

The ban will do little to daunt the protesters.  In fact, some burnt copies of the government’s draft even as it was being tabled in parliament.  As for Anna Hazare and his supporters, they have many venues to choose from even if Jantar Mantar is closed to them.

What is worrying is that the government feels neither the need nor the inclination to respond to the protesters with the wile of politics, or even with a debate. Instead, it is trying to muscle them into silence using state instruments. What can be farther from whatever notions of democracy the commons hold?


 

Related stories

Stories you might like

“Citizen, not parliament, is supreme in true democracy”
Weeds that plague the garden city
Here's the real MMS scandal
Former NHAI member may face CBI probe
Cricket, ugly cricket

More stories in this section

At home in politics: dilemma of a disgraced bureaucrat
A thin line between governance and control
Taking cue from Okhil Babu's lota travails
Comments posted as an unregistered user will need to be approved by an editor. If you would like to post comments without delay, please register / login.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Input format
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters (without spaces) shown in the image.

In This Section

  • Most Emailed
  • Most Popular
  • Most Commented
  • I just want to be a change agent - Nilekani...
  • e-Gov lessons from Estonia!...
  • Gandhi in Egypt...
  • Shouldn't the PM come within the ambit of Lok...
2G anna hazare Bihar BJP CBI china congress corruption Delhi DoT e-governance facebook Gujarat High Court India jairam ramesh Kapil Sibal Karnataka Maharashtra Manmohan Singh Mumbai parliament P Chidambaram Pranab Mukherjee prime minister rajya sabha RTI supreme court US Uttar Pradesh
more tags
News
  • Top Stories
  • Public Reporter
  • Photo Story
  • Protests & Petitions
  • GNtv
Views
  • Day's Debate
  • Columns
  • Think Tank
  • Interview
  • GNtalk
  • Backstory
GovNow
  • Parliament
  • Your MP
  • Bureaucracy
  • Judiciary
  • Policy
GovNext
  • RTI
  • eGov
  • GreenGov
  • GovPitch
Follow Us
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS
Copyright ©2010 Governance Now
  • Copyright Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Help
  • Advertise with us
  • Careers
  • Contact Us
Developed by LDI