• About Us
  • Feedback
  • Events Calendar
  • Archives
  • Newsletter
Advanced Search
  • Home
  • News
  • Views
  • GovNow
  • GovNext
  • Login
  • Register
News
  • Top Stories
  • Public Reporter
  • Photo Story
  • Protests & Petitions
  • GNtv
Views
  • Day's Debate
  • Columns
  • Think Tank
  • Interview
  • GNtalk
  • Backstory
GovNow
  • Parliament
  • Your MP
  • Bureaucracy
  • Judiciary
  • Policy
GovNext
  • RTI
  • eGov
  • GreenGov
  • GovPitch
Follow Us
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS
Home › Views › Columns › IIT billing can take a hike

IIT billing can take a hike

A baffling method of recovering costs from its graduates
Sarthak Ray | September 22 2011

Author Profile

sarthak's picture
Sarthak Ray

Share

The government has hiked the fees for undergraduate engineering courses at IITs from Rs 2 lakh to Rs 8 lakh, which will apply from 2013.  The hike leaves out SC, ST and OBC students and graduates from the general category who are unable to afford it or choose to study further.Those being charged can pay the amount in easy instalments after they take up job offers. While the hike is a welcome move, the motive behind it and the structuring of its payment seem questionable. One, why will only a certain class of students have to pay? Generous subsidies from the government cushion the students from bearing the full weight of the cost of their education. At the IITs, the government picks up a tab of Rs 6 lakh per student. Proponents of subsidising higher education, especially at the IITs, need to revisit their arguments in the light of today’s realities. Engineering placements, especially at IITs, are a sellers’ market. Paying the hike in easy instalments wouldn’t strain graduates with stellar starting salaries.

Two, what exactly does the government hope to achieve? Is it really serious about recovering costs? A more pragmatic move would have been to hike the fees upfront without the late-payments rider. There are many nationalised banks with soft-lending options for students who want to get into premier institutes. The arrangement has worked so far, and will work far into the future. On the surface, it would seem like the government wants graduates to choose academia over corporate (with the reprieve for those choosing further studies). But the amount is too low to deter one from taking up a high-paying corporate job in favour of working in a government laboratory.

Three, what’s with the caste rider? With four years at IIT behind him/her, would the caste of an applicant matter to a Google or Texas Instruments? Of course, there are far lesser dalits in big jobs than there should be. But the remedy is ensuring that more of them get into the IITs and other desi Ivy League institutes, not being ingratiatingly (politically) charitable on those graduating out of them. Some would argue that the statutes on relaxed fees for dalits will be contravened if they are asked to pay. Well, in that case, why not give them the option of paying back a commensurate differential instead of foregoing the entire amount? Affirmative action should be directed at the premier institutes which are burdened under the cost of educating each student, whether from the general category or from a caste list.

Lastly, will it tax the entrepreneur? Not a word on what happens to the those who decide they will be offering jobs instead of looking for one!
 

Related stories

Stories you might like

E-commerce sector to see robust hiring this year
Punjab: hostel warden booked for molesting girl
IIT status will dilute BHU's integrity: faculty
RS passes two key education bills
No uniformity in state and centre RTE rules

More stories in this section

At home in politics: dilemma of a disgraced bureaucrat
A thin line between governance and control
Taking cue from Okhil Babu's lota travails
Comments posted as an unregistered user will need to be approved by an editor. If you would like to post comments without delay, please register / login.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Input format
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters (without spaces) shown in the image.

In This Section

  • Most Emailed
  • Most Popular
  • Most Commented
  • I just want to be a change agent - Nilekani...
  • e-Gov lessons from Estonia!...
  • Gandhi in Egypt...
  • Shouldn't the PM come within the ambit of Lok...
2G anna hazare Bihar BJP CBI china congress corruption Delhi DoT e-governance facebook Gujarat High Court India jairam ramesh Kapil Sibal Karnataka Maharashtra Manmohan Singh Mumbai parliament P Chidambaram Pranab Mukherjee prime minister rajya sabha RTI supreme court US Uttar Pradesh
more tags
News
  • Top Stories
  • Public Reporter
  • Photo Story
  • Protests & Petitions
  • GNtv
Views
  • Day's Debate
  • Columns
  • Think Tank
  • Interview
  • GNtalk
  • Backstory
GovNow
  • Parliament
  • Your MP
  • Bureaucracy
  • Judiciary
  • Policy
GovNext
  • RTI
  • eGov
  • GreenGov
  • GovPitch
Follow Us
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS
Copyright ©2010 Governance Now
  • Copyright Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Help
  • Advertise with us
  • Careers
  • Contact Us
Developed by LDI