• About Us
  • Feedback
  • Events Calendar
  • Archives
  • Newsletter
Advanced Search
  • Home
  • News
  • Views
  • GovNow
  • GovNext
  • Login
  • Register
News
  • Top Stories
  • Public Reporter
  • Photo Story
  • Protests & Petitions
  • GNtv
Views
  • Day's Debate
  • Columns
  • Think Tank
  • Interview
  • GNtalk
  • Backstory
GovNow
  • Parliament
  • Your MP
  • Bureaucracy
  • Judiciary
  • Policy
GovNext
  • RTI
  • eGov
  • GreenGov
  • GovPitch
Follow Us
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS
Home › Views › Day's Debate › Is equal property rights among couples a fair proposition?

Is equal property rights among couples a fair proposition?

GN Bureau | February 06 2012

Share

The planning commission has suggested that property laws be amended to grant equal rights to each partner in a marriage or a live-in relationship over property (immovable and movable) acquired after the marriage or moving in together — irrespective of who bought it.

The suggestion seems progressive on the face of it. This will grant economic security to homemakers who have to give up on income earning options because of the nature of their work in case the marriage or the live-in relationship gets dissolved. It also recognises the work of the partner who assumes the role of the homemaker putting her/him on a par with the earning partner. In the case of women, especially, it recognises their contribution to the running of the household.

However, the suggestion, if implemented, could subvert the fight against the practice of dowry. In case of a marriage where dowry has been taken, the assets so acquired will be then treated as joint assets. So, in case of separation, despite the best intentions, the suggestion itself would promote an unequitable distribution. The woman may end up losing half of what she and/or her parents had paid for.

Considering the above, do you think an equal distribution of property in case of dissolution of marriage or live-in is a fair proposition?

Related stories

Stories you might like

New CEO for union health and family welfare ministry
Tech group to revisit poverty estimates in two weeks: Govt
Poverty alleviation matters, not the numbers
Plan panel's definition of poverty a joke: BJP
Civil society leaders flay poverty figures

More stories in this section

Is bad governance, and not market forces, behind the petrol hike?
Should MPs get red beacons?
Will amnesty help recover black money?

Poll

Is equal property rights among couples a fair proposition?
Yes
75% (6 votes)
No
25% (2 votes)
Can't Say
0% (0 votes)
Comments posted as an unregistered user will need to be approved by an editor. If you would like to post comments without delay, please register / login.
Comments : 2
View:
medicalmitra capfs's picture
medicalmitra capfs

yss a strong YES.In fact i wd like go further that women being better keepers & managers of material should hv stroger say in propety matters between couples.Rarely u hear a lady opting for sanyas & least so fm affluent strata of society as against men.So equal property rights .....sooner the better.....dr sharma

3 months 2 weeks ago
  • reply
Bathsheba's picture
Bathsheba (not verified)

Note, the keyword has to be equitable, not equal. In some cases, the homemaker should be entitled to more than a half as she/he has sacrificed career prospects and the economic security that comes with it. a future value of a career based on a person's qualifications (academic, non-academic and professional) should be considered for alimony, child support and property distribution. it should be made a part of a legally-binding pre-nup. we do not have the concept of a pre-nup in India. It is time we recognise the need for it and make the necessary laws.

3 months 2 weeks ago
  • reply

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Input format
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Enter the characters (without spaces) shown in the image.

In This Section

  • Most Emailed
  • Most Popular
  • Most Commented
  • I just want to be a change agent - Nilekani...
  • e-Gov lessons from Estonia!...
  • Gandhi in Egypt...
  • Shouldn't the PM come within the ambit of Lok...
2G anna hazare Bihar BJP CBI china congress corruption Delhi DoT e-governance facebook Gujarat High Court India jairam ramesh Kapil Sibal Karnataka Maharashtra Manmohan Singh Mumbai parliament P Chidambaram Pranab Mukherjee prime minister rajya sabha RTI supreme court US Uttar Pradesh
more tags
News
  • Top Stories
  • Public Reporter
  • Photo Story
  • Protests & Petitions
  • GNtv
Views
  • Day's Debate
  • Columns
  • Think Tank
  • Interview
  • GNtalk
  • Backstory
GovNow
  • Parliament
  • Your MP
  • Bureaucracy
  • Judiciary
  • Policy
GovNext
  • RTI
  • eGov
  • GreenGov
  • GovPitch
Follow Us
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS
Copyright ©2010 Governance Now
  • Copyright Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Help
  • Advertise with us
  • Careers
  • Contact Us
Developed by LDI