All benches should appreciate SC ruling on Singur: Medha Patkar -Governance Now

All benches should appreciate SC ruling on Singur: Medha Patkar

Medha Patkar, social activist and leader of National Alliance of People’s Movements talks about SC ruling on Singur

Sreelatha Menon | September 16, 2016

#NANO #Ratan Tata #Land grap #SC #West Bengal #Farmers #Singur #Medha Patkar #National Alliance of Peoples Movements

Medha Patkar, social activist and leader of National Alliance of People’s Movements

Now that the SC has given the judgment for returning the land of the farmers in Singur, does this guarantee similar rulings for farmers protesting against acquisition of land in other parts of the country?

There are no such guarantees. Different benches are giving different judgments. In fact, since the Land Acquisition Act, 2013 came into being, 25 judgments have come on ‘public purpose’ and all are different. Everything has to be fought and fought and fought. Look at the Sardar Sarovar Project. It is the 31st year of our fight and we are still fighting. As for this judgment, it is by one bench. All benches should appreciate it. All benches of the apex court and other courts should speak in one voice on land acquisition.

So what is the significance of the judgment?

It is as historic as the Singur farmers’ movement was. It is significant for mainly two reasons: First, it takes a stand on protecting fertile agricultural land, and does not discriminate between those farmers who received compensation and those who refused to take it. When we went to Singur in the beginning of the protests, we were arguing that the land being taken from farmers was not barren but fertile. I, Mahasweta Devi and all activists of the Singur movement were present. We took pictures in the fields to prove that fertile land was being taken when barren land was available.

Secondly, the movement succeeded as most farmers remained firm on their stand. While nearly 1,000 acres of land was taken, owners of about 400 acres refused to accept compensation. The others were under pressure to take it. The judgment will now help all the owners get back their land.

What was the role of the West Bengal government?

One should first salute the farmers who bravely fought, even without taking compensation. But this ruling would not have been possible if the Mamata Banerjee government had not supported the petition in court. The best part is that the Left parties are also now on our side.

But wasn’t the Singur situation created by the Left?

The Left has however been part of the fight against the retrograde land ordinance of the Modi government and it opposed all the three ordinances along with movements and other parties.

So what should we expect now?

What we must have now is political unity, at least in Bengal, on land issues. The reason is that in Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan and other BJP-ruled states, land legislations have been made which are exact replicas of the anti-farmer Modi ordinance. Hence, political unity is very essential.

The judgment is being seen as anti-industry and anti-industrialisation. Is that true?

It won’t come in the way of industry. Industry and agriculture should complement each other. Aren’t they both meant for the good of society?

Can’t Tata Motors appeal against the judgment?

I feel that the Tatas should also welcome the judgment. They should show that they are different from the stereotypes that we see in the industrial sector

Even according to the 2013 Act, land not used should be returned to the original owners. Is that helping anyone?

About 40,000 hectares were acquired from various people for the Sardar Sarovar Project. According to the 2013 Act, they are all owners again as the government never took possession of the acquired land. The Indore high court has even stayed the acquisition. Now if the government of Madhya Pradesh wishes to get that land, it has to acquire it again, take consent, and so on.

(The interview appears in September 16-30, 2016 edition of Governance Now )

Comments

Other News

RBI pauses to assess inflation risks, policy transmission

The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has begun the new fiscal year with a calibrated pause, keeping the repo rate unchanged at 5.25 per cent in its April Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) meeting. The decision, taken unanimously, reflects a shift from aggressive policy action to cautious observation after a signi

New pathways for tourism growth

Traditionally, India’s tourism policy has been based on three main components: the number of visitors, building tourist attractions and providing facilities for tourists. Due to the increase in climate-related issues and environmental destruction that occurred over previous years, policymakers have b

Is the US a superpower anymore?

On April 8, hours after warning that “a whole civilisation will die tonight,” US president Donald Trump, exhibiting his unique style of retreating from high-voltage brinkmanship, announced that he agreed to a two-week ceasefire with Iran. The weekend talks in Islamabad have failed and the futur

Machines communicate, humans connect

There is a moment every event professional knows—the kind that arrives without warning, usually an hour before the curtain rises. Months of meticulous planning are in place. And then comes the call: “We’ll also need a projector. For the slides.” No email

Why India is entering a ‘stagflation lite’ phase

India’s macroeconomic narrative is quietly shifting—from a rare “Goldilocks” equilibrium of stable growth and contained inflation to a more fragile phase where external shocks are beginning to dominate domestic policy outcomes. The numbers still look reassuring at first glance: GDP

Labour law in India: A decade of transition

The story of labour law in India is not just about laws and codes, but also about how the nation has continued to negotiate the position of the workforce within its economic framework. The implementation of the Labour Codes across the country in November 2025 marks a definitive endpoint in the process. Yet