All benches should appreciate SC ruling on Singur: Medha Patkar

Medha Patkar, social activist and leader of National Alliance of People’s Movements talks about SC ruling on Singur

sreelatha

Sreelatha Menon | September 16, 2016


#NANO   #Ratan Tata   #Land grap   #SC   #West Bengal   #Farmers   #Singur   #Medha Patkar   #National Alliance of Peoples Movements  
Medha Patkar, social activist and leader of National Alliance of People’s Movements
Medha Patkar, social activist and leader of National Alliance of People’s Movements

Now that the SC has given the judgment for returning the land of the farmers in Singur, does this guarantee similar rulings for farmers protesting against acquisition of land in other parts of the country?
There are no such guarantees. Different benches are giving different judgments. In fact, since the Land Acquisition Act, 2013 came into being, 25 judgments have come on ‘public purpose’ and all are different. Everything has to be fought and fought and fought. Look at the Sardar Sarovar Project. It is the 31st year of our fight and we are still fighting. As for this judgment, it is by one bench. All benches should appreciate it. All benches of the apex court and other courts should speak in one voice on land acquisition.
 
So what is the significance of the judgment?
It is as historic as the Singur farmers’ movement was. It is significant for mainly two reasons: First, it takes a stand on protecting fertile agricultural land, and does not discriminate between those farmers who received compensation and those who refused to take it. When we went to Singur in the beginning of the protests, we were arguing that the land being taken from farmers was not barren but fertile. I, Mahasweta Devi and all activists of the Singur movement were present. We took pictures in the fields to prove that fertile land was being taken when barren land was available.
 
Secondly, the movement succeeded as most farmers remained firm on their stand. While nearly 1,000 acres of land was taken, owners of about 400 acres refused to accept compensation. The others were under pressure to take it. The judgment will now help all the owners get back their land.
What was the role of the West Bengal government?
One should first salute the farmers who bravely fought, even without taking compensation. But this ruling would not have been possible if the Mamata Banerjee government had not supported the petition in court. The best part is that the Left parties are also now on our side.
But wasn’t the Singur situation created by the Left?
The Left has however been part of the fight against the retrograde land ordinance of the Modi government and it opposed all the three ordinances along with movements and other parties.
 
So what should we expect now?
What we must have now is political unity, at least in Bengal, on land issues. The reason is that in Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan and other BJP-ruled states, land legislations have been made which are exact replicas of the anti-farmer Modi ordinance. Hence, political unity is very essential. 
The judgment is being seen as anti-industry and anti-industrialisation. Is that true?
It won’t come in the way of industry. Industry and agriculture should complement each other. Aren’t they both meant for the good of society?
 
Can’t Tata Motors appeal against the judgment?
I feel that the Tatas should also welcome the judgment. They should show that they are different from the stereotypes that we see in the industrial sector
 
Even according to the 2013 Act, land not used should be returned to the original owners. Is that helping anyone?
About 40,000 hectares were acquired from various people for the Sardar Sarovar Project. According to the 2013 Act, they are all owners again as the government never took possession of the acquired land. The Indore high court has even stayed the acquisition. Now if the government of Madhya Pradesh wishes to get that land, it has to acquire it again, take consent, and so on.
 
(The interview appears in September 16-30, 2016 edition of Governance Now )
 

Comments

 

Other News

Nitish Kumar quits as Bihar CM

Nitish Kumar resigned as chief minister of Bihar on Wednesday, just hours after RJD chief Lalu Prasad ruled out his son and deputy chief minister Tejashwi Yadav putting in his papers following a case being registered by the CBI. The JD(U) and RJD alliance had been under considerable strain o

Will the needy get homes under PMAY?

 The Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana (PMAY), introduced in June 2015, aims at providing every family with “a pucca house with water connection, toilet facilities, 24x7 electricity supply” by the time the nation completes 75 years of its Independence in 2022.   The Yoj

No longer a walk in the park for bureaucrats

Continuing as a bureaucrat just got a lot tougher with the government weeding out the incompetent and taking action against 381 civil services officers, including 24 who were from the Indian Administrative Service.   The Narendra Modi government’s action against civil s

Kashmir’s ‘Nelson Mandela’ arrested for terror funding

 The National Investigating Agency (NIA) has arrested Shabbir Shah, who was once called the Nelson Mandela of Kashmir for his advocacy of peace, for his alleged involvement in money laundering to support terrorism in Kashmir. Shah, whose J&K democratic freedom party is a part of the pro-

Quantum urbanism: Step one, dismantle systems thinking once and for all

Feel your favourite city. The words that typically come to your mind are liberally fused with adjectives in a valiant effort to give shape to our deeply felt emotions. It is quite common to find descriptions that are a chaotic and joyful mix of traits and idiosyncrasies that one can mistake for a good frie

Should employment exchanges be scrapped?

Should employment exchanges be scrapped?





Video

Death toll rises to 17 in Mumbai building collapse

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook    Twitter    Google Plus    Linkedin    Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter