Has capitalism failed?

The recent global slump is seen by many as a business cycle inherent in capitalism and market economy. It was actually man made and the professional leadership wholly responsible for it lacked professional ethics

sudipb

Sudip Bhattacharyya | September 23, 2013



We failed as regulators, we failed as supervisors, we failed as corporate governance managers, we failed as risk managers, and we also failed in the allocation of roles and responsibilities for international economic organisations.

This was ignored in an atmosphere of great prosperity where everybody was making a lot of money and everybody thought that innovation was the name of the game - and by warning that something could go wrong, you would look like you were holding progress back.

According to British economist Anatole Kaletsky, “Current financial crisis has exposed modern economics as emperor with no clothes”. He believes that the reason for the disastrous economic downturn is largely because modern economics has sadly coincided with loads-a-money and greed as the new economic thinking. This has been described as Gucci capitalism by another renowned economist Noreena Hertz that was born in mid 80s as the lovechild of Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher with Milton Freedman, the free market Guru, as the fairy god father.

Many people are blamed for the current economic crisis - the bankers for being too powerful and lending money to people who would not be able to repay, the investment bankers for greed, regulators for being too weak, checks and balances not in place and  public themselves for borrowing too much. However, the blame also lies in the fact that the following three basic economic assumptions that caused, encouraged and justified the Gucci type of unbridled capitalism-

1)    Human beings act rationally which helps  to create with certainty an efficient market economy,
2)    Govt should have a minimal non-interfering role if a market economy is to be successful, 
3)    Markets could self- regulate and allocate resources fairly and equitably without govt. intervention, have now been comprehensively disproved. Without  various fiscal and monetary stimulus measures quickly taken by the UK, USA and other  countries to restore confidence, the blow to the world’s affluence would have been more perpetuating.

We snigger at fortune tellers but continue to rely on people who are often deeply divided and, who, in any case, qualify all their forecasts with the phrase “ceteris paribus” (other things remaining the same). 

So, has capitalism failed? Anybody can feel that a great churning is going on in the economies of practically every country. And, in this churning every country willy-nilly will have to modify the market driven aggressive capitalism (in the name of free economy) with pronounced application of ethics and vigilance against succumbing (in their philosophical orientations as well as in the level of implementations) to the charms of excess and begin baring their seamy sides.

If life is about the lessons we learn along the way, then surely the last decades of greed and selfishness taught us that short term financial gains do not make healthy economy. It is unfortunate that economics and business has been reduced to a single minded and blinkered pursuit of Mammon; short term gain, making a fast buck, etc., have become the mantra. But these are seductive traps and in the long run lead to erosion of wealth of the nation and consequently, suffering and misery. Even though over use has made it a cliché, there is much virtue in the old adage “As you sow, so will you reap”. We have to then, rediscover professional ethics and desist from sowing wind so that we do not reap whirlwind.

There is therefore, a clear need to replace competition and greed with a new type of economics based on ethics and social justice in the governance of business and financial institutions.  Noble Laureate Amartya Sen thinks the present crisis do not call for an entirely “new capitalism” but a new understanding of older ideas  such as those of Adam Smith as expressed in his first book “The Theory of Moral Sentiments” in which he advocated values other than profit making (The Wealth of Nations ) as the goal of capitalism. This means that there should always be a clear mandate for the govt to intervene to stop the free market becoming a casino economy. Modern capitalism needs to reform itself accordingly with much infusion of ethics and strict vigilance against any departure there-from.

Comments

 

Other News

General Dhiraj Seth takes over as Chief of Army Staff

General Dhiraj Seth, PVSM, UYSM, AVSM, took over as the 31st Chief of the Army Staff (COAS) from General Upendra Dwivedi, PVSM, AVSM, who superannuated after more than four decades of distinguished service to the nation on Tuesday.   General Dhiraj Seth is an alumnus of the N

The women India doesn`t count enough

She runs a tailoring shop from a single room in her house. Every morning she stitches school uniforms, answers queries on WhatsApp, collects payments through UPI and orders fabric online. Officially, she still belongs to India`s informal economy. Yet her enterprise is no longer disconnected from the formal

“Cancer is just a mind game”

Dr. Ananda Shankar Jayant, a Padma Shri awardee, inspired audiences for decades through her mastery of Bharatanatyam and Kuchipudi. But it was her journey through cancer that taught some of life`s most powerful lessons in courage and resilience.

Why Swami Vivekananda is the pathfinder for our times

Swami Vivekananda for Our Times  Edited and compiled by Rajiv Sikri, with Introduction by S. Gurumurthy Rupa Publications, 552 pages, Rs 695  

Five ways to realise the potential of India’s handicraft and handloom sector

India`s economic ambitions are increasingly defined by the industries of the future. Semiconductors, electronics, artificial intelligence and advanced manufacturing dominate policy conversations. Yet one of India`s largest employment-intensive sectors continues to occupy a surprisingly marginal place in ec

Beyond toilets: Why open defecation persists in rural India

Despite the awareness campaigns on sanitation across India, open defecation (OD) is practised openly and widely in both rural and urban areas. Research shows that rural respondents are well aware of the negative impacts of OD, yet this awareness does not lead to toilet construction or use. In rural North I





Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter