India unwilling to budge on border dispute with China -Governance Now

India unwilling to budge on border dispute with China

Army chief General Bipin Rawat oversees preparation at border with China

Shankar Kumar | June 30, 2017 | New Delhi

#road #Bhutan #General Bipin Rawat #army #Sikkim #border dispute #Beijing #China #India #aggression #Senkoku

General Bipin Rawat. (Photo: Twitter/@IndianArmyChief)

Army chief General Bipin Rawat personally oversaw the defence preparedness in Sikkim, amid Chinese media’s vituperative comment on India and escalating tension between the two countries over the Doklam plateau where Chinese army’s efforts to construct a road is being resisted by the Indian army.

It indicates India is not going to budge before the Chinese pressure on the plateau, which actually falls within Bhutan, a tiny Himalayan nation whose territorial protection is India’s responsibility.

Although Thimpu has issued a demarche to China’s Delhi-based diplomat over China’s insistence on constructing a road from Doklam plateau to Doka-La, an area falling on the Line of Actual Control (LAC), Beijing is reluctant to understand the diplomatic language.

In fact, believing in ‘might is right’ dictum, Beijing wants to forcibly open a way into Bhutanese territory, which India believes, could lead to compromise on the security of both India and Bhutan. Showing their aggression, Chinese army demolished Indian soldiers’ two bunkers and stopped pilgrims’ movement to Kailash Mansarovar. Known for its foxiness, China also lodged a protest with India on the issue, a first of kind from Beijing in long, but festering relations between the two countries.

This it did to portray its victimhood picture before the media. It was timed well. It did so when prime minister Narendra Modi was meeting US president Donald Trump in the White House. Those who know China, have no confusion about its expansionist agenda. It has forcibly taken away from Vietnam and the Philippines, their coral reefs and islands lying in the South China Sea and then made an artificial island over it.

In July 2016, an international tribunal, the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) in The Hague, rejected Beijing’s claim over the South China Sea on which Brunei, Indonesia, Malaysia, Taiwan, Vietnam and the Philippines have their territorial claims also. Despite this, China, in pursuance of its aggressive design, not only disobeyed the ruling, but also made it clear that its claim over the South China Sea would not be compromised. Then its dispute with Japan over the Senkaku Islands, a group of uninhabited islands in the East China Sea is well documented fact. China which calls these islands as Diaoyu islands, lays claim on them.

But India is calling a spade a spade. It has no plan to cede an inch to China. However, the current India-China face off at Doklam plateau reminds one about 1988 when the Chinese troops crossed into Bhutan and took control of the Chumbi Valley, lying below the Doklam plateau. After several days of face-off, Chinese troops had withdrawn from the area. This time, however, it has to be seen how PLA soldiers respond.

Already more than a week has passed and they are staying put in Doklam plateau. Experts suggest that New Delhi should not give in to the Chinese pressure, because their occupying Doklam plateau means strategic loss for Indian soldiers over Chumbi Valley. It also means giving Chinese soldiers an opportunity to reach up to Chicken neck, the Siliguri corridor that connects mainland India with the country’s North-East.

For years, China seems to be harbouring a design to cut off Northeast states from mainland India. It has received a push after the arrival of Xi Jinping at the helm of affairs of China.

India is not deterred by China’s might. Despite its economy, as experts suggests, being one third of China and defence budget almost a quarter of Beijing, New Delhi is quietly doing what suits its national interest. Besides, developing infrastructure in Northeast and Leh, it is strengthening the defence muscle.

Comments

Other News

Gandhian movement after Gandhi failed: Ram Guha

The Gandhian movement in India, after Gandhi’s death, failed, says Ramachandra Guha, and blames Vinoba Bhave for it. But the movement found new, fertile grounds around the world and succeeded in bringing about a change in South Africa, the US and elsewhere. It is high time it returned home. Of cour

When religion, politics and Bollywood come together

Tavleen Singh, noted journalist and political commentator, has turned to fiction, with her debut novel ‘The Actor’ (HaperCollins India). Set in the near future, it has a superstar, Amit Singh, turning to politics, when the political landscape is dominated by prime minister Guru Gaynendraj

Cabinet approves setting up of Integrated Transport & Logistics Authority

The union cabinet, chaired by prime minister Narendra Modi, on Tuesday approved the setting up of a Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV), called Integrated Transport & Logistics Authority (ITLA), to strengthen research, planning, appraisal, monitoring and impact assessment within the broad domains of Transp

Why foundational literacy and numeracy is key to school education

Foundational Literacy and Numeracy (FLN) are often described as the building blocks of education. Yet, their significance goes well beyond a child’s ability to read a sentence, write a response or solve a basic mathematical problem. These foundational skills shape how children understand the world,

When police data becomes the algorithm

For decades, policing has followed a familiar sequence: a crime occurs, the police respond, an investigation produces records and those records become part of the institutional memory of the criminal justice system. Artificial intelligence is beginning to alter that sequence. Instead of merely recording

Before India voted, the framers worried about the referee

“We are making a Constitution forever and not only for today.” Shibban Lal Saksena said this in the Constituent Assembly on June 15, 1949. He was warning that a ruling party might one day choose a loyalist to run India’s elections. Seventy-seven years later, the Supreme Court is wrestli