Attack on journalists: Katju demands action

Asks centre and state governments to severely punish police personnel involved in attacks

PTI | December 24, 2012



Condemning the Delhi police action against mediapersons during the protests at India gate on Sunday as a "flagrant attack on democracy", Press Council of India (PCI) chairperson Justice Markandey Katju on Monday sought action against policemen who were responsible for it.

In a statement here, the former Supreme Court judge said that he strongly condemned the attack on journalists by the police in Delhi during the protests at India Gate and Rajpath against the gangrape of a 23-year-old.

"The journalists were only covering the events, which it is their fundamental right under the Constitution to do, and in fact that is their duty to the public. Many journalists were targeted by the police, their cameras broken, and many were physically assaulted," Katju said.

"This a flagrant attack on democracy in the country, and it is not an isolated incident. Many such incidents are coming to my knowledge from different parts of the country," he said.

Katju said that that though it is reported that some people in the crowds threw stones at the police, surely journalists did not throw stones.

"The police cannot take the plea that they could not distinguish between journalists and non-journalists because the journalists were carrying cameras and other equipment which made them clearly distinguishable," he said.

In his statement, Katju asked the Centre and the state governments to severely punish police personnel involved in attacks on journalists.

The PCI chief said, "The government of the Union and all states are therefore called upon to severely punish the police personnel involved in the attacks on journalists, and ensure that such incidents do not recur in future, failing which it will be deemed that they are unable to run the government in accordance with the Constitution, and then the legal consequences in Articles 355 and 356 (which deal with the failure of constitutional machinery) may follow."

He also demanded that all medical aid be provided to the injured journalists immediately.

Comments

 

Other News

Gandhian movement after Gandhi failed: Ram Guha

The Gandhian movement in India, after Gandhi’s death, failed, says Ramachandra Guha, and blames Vinoba Bhave for it. But the movement found new, fertile grounds around the world and succeeded in bringing about a change in South Africa, the US and elsewhere. It is high time it returned home. Of cour

When religion, politics and Bollywood come together

Tavleen Singh, noted journalist and political commentator, has turned to fiction, with her debut novel ‘The Actor’ (HaperCollins India). Set in the near future, it has a superstar, Amit Singh, turning to politics, when the political landscape is dominated by prime minister Guru Gaynendraj

Cabinet approves setting up of Integrated Transport & Logistics Authority

The union cabinet, chaired by prime minister Narendra Modi, on Tuesday approved the setting up of a Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV), called Integrated Transport & Logistics Authority (ITLA), to strengthen research, planning, appraisal, monitoring and impact assessment within the broad domains of Transp

Why foundational literacy and numeracy is key to school education

Foundational Literacy and Numeracy (FLN) are often described as the building blocks of education. Yet, their significance goes well beyond a child’s ability to read a sentence, write a response or solve a basic mathematical problem. These foundational skills shape how children understand the world,

When police data becomes the algorithm

For decades, policing has followed a familiar sequence: a crime occurs, the police respond, an investigation produces records and those records become part of the institutional memory of the criminal justice system. Artificial intelligence is beginning to alter that sequence. Instead of merely recording

Before India voted, the framers worried about the referee

“We are making a Constitution forever and not only for today.” Shibban Lal Saksena said this in the Constituent Assembly on June 15, 1949. He was warning that a ruling party might one day choose a loyalist to run India’s elections. Seventy-seven years later, the Supreme Court is wrestli

Upcoming Conferences



-->

Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter