Magazine Subscription
  • Home
  • News
  • Views
  • GovNow
  • GovNext
  • Login
  • Register
Home › News › Competitive bidding could have saved Rs 1.86L cr: CAG

Competitive bidding could have saved Rs 1.86L cr: CAG

Says coal ministry should "urgently" work out modalities to implement the procedure of allocation of coal blocks for captive mining through competitive bidding
PTI | New Delhi | August 17 2012

Rapping the government for its failure to timely implement the competitive bidding mechanism for allocation of coal blocks, CAG on Friday said part of the Rs 1.86 lakh crore loss could have been partially tapped had the procedure been put in place earlier.

Also read:

Coalfield allotments, CAG report and some-zero games
There are many faulty assumptions and some plain wishful thinking behind CAG’s astounding estimate of loss to the exchequer – as well as the call for auction of natural resources
2G and Coalgate: two scams but just one script
Comparing two major scandals of our times has revealing lessons for future scamsters

In its report, tabled in Parliament, CAG said 25 firms including Essar Power, Hindalco, Tata Steel, Tata Power and Jindal Steel and Power were benefited to the tune of Rs 1.86 lakh crore from coal blocks allocated to them on nomination basis, instead of competitive bidding.

"The government could have tapped a part of this financial benefit by expediting decision on competitive bidding for allocation of coal blocks," CAG said in the report.

CAG said it has arrived at the estimated loss to the national exchequer based on the average cost of production and average sale price of opencast mines of Coal India in the year 2010-11.

"A part of this financial gain could have accrued to the national exchequer by operationalising the decision taken years earlier to introduce competitive bidding for allocation of coal blocks," CAG said.

There was no specific criteria for allocation of coal blocks in the country till 1993. From 1993 onwards, Ministry of Coal started awarding blocks to private parties for captive mining on recommendations of the Inter-Ministerial Screening Committee or through direct allocation.

The concept of allocation of captive coal blocks through competitive bidding was first announced in 2004. However, the government is yet to finalise the modus operandi of the mechanism. In the mean time, 194 coal blocks were allocated to different government and private parties up to March 31, 2011.

To bring objectivity and transparency in the allocation and for tapping of a part of benefit for accruing to the allottees of captive coal blocks, CAG said the Coal Ministry should "urgently" work out modalities to implement the procedure of allocation of coal blocks for captive mining through competitive bidding.

Related stories

Stories you might like

Is the new CAG to close to UPA for public comfort?
Why it could be wrong to name defence secretary as CAG
Well done, Vinod Rai, for not eyeing Lutyens' bungalow
Needed: legal framework for CBI
UPA under fire: CAG sends over Rs 2250cr blow on NREGS

More stories in this section

In peccadillo, sacked Murthy fathers a verb: Phaneesh-ed!
Why it could be wrong to name defence secretary as CAG
'No solid proof against any other IPL player'

Author

 

In Other Stories

  • Lokpal, three crucial bills priority for UPA on Tuesday
  • BJP names media coordinators for polls
  • BJP set to block Lokpal bill passage
  • Candidates can't hold office of profit
  • YC leaders to spend New Year in Sevagram
  • Governance Now headlines: Lokpal debate begins
  • LS disrupts over minority quota issue
  • In Orissa, was it a plot for or against the ‘distressed’?
  • Governance Now headlines: Ambanis' business tango
  • Governance Now headlines: UP govt starts covering Maya's statues

In This Section

  • Most Emailed
  • Most Popular
  • Most Commented
  • Fragility of regulatory reform...
  • Mixed signals from Indian economy...
  • Union Budget: A comedy of errors...
  • An open application to Prannoy Roy for post o...
anna hazare Bihar BJP CBI china congress corruption Delhi e-governance facebook Gujarat High Court India jairam ramesh Kapil Sibal Karnataka Maharashtra Manmohan Singh Mumbai Narendra Modi parliament P Chidambaram Pranab Mukherjee prime minister rajya sabha RTI Sonia Gandhi supreme court UPA Uttar Pradesh
more tags
Copyright ©2010 Governance Now
  • Copyright Info
  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Help
  • Advertise with us
  • Careers
  • Contact Us
  • Sitemap