Document exposes Cong MP Vijay Darda's coal deal

CBI may soon summon Darda and his son Devendra for interrogation in the coal blocks allotted to the company with their help

GN Bureau | October 5, 2012



Armed with a letter written by Manoj Jayaswal to allot 26 percent shares of AMR Iron and Steel Private Limited, a Jayaswal Group company, "free of cost" to the Lokmat Group of Congress MP Vijay Darda, the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) may soon summon Darda and his son Devendra for interrogation in the coal blocks allotted to the company with their help.

The letter also implicates coal minister Sriprakash Jaiswal as the letter written by Manoj to his father heading the group states: "Further I urge that a suitable time be communicated to Shri Sriprakash for settlement of ownership of 14 percent shares of AMR. Any delay would only raise doubts in the minds of external parties which is not welcome." The minister has denied getting the offer to arbitrate, but the CBI may quiz him as well.

The CBI will be questioning Darda and his son Devendra, who has been named in the FIR against AMR, on what efforts they made to get the coal block allocations to the Jayaswal as also the Congress MP's links with Santosh Bagrodia, who was a minister of state for coal during the period and whether he was also present in the minister's chamber on July 18, 2008 when representatives of AMR attending a meeting.

Jayaswal's letter nails Darda as it says, "AMR has been allocated a coal block because of the efforts of the Lokmat Groups and hence commitments made have to be honoured....."

Out of the seven companies so far booked by the CBI for fraudulently securing the captive coal blocks, three are associated with Jayswals and Dardas: AMR, Nagpur, Jawaharlal Darda Yavatmal Energy Ltd, Nagpur and JAS Infrastructure Capital Pvt Limited, Kolkata.

AMR promoted by the Jayswals -- Manoj, Arvind Kumar and Ramesh -- allocated five coal blocks on the date of application but fraudulently concealed factors. The CBI found an inquiry initiated by the coal ministry found that the group companies were not entitled for allocation since they had been given allocations earlier too, but the officials did not pursue the inquiry and allowed allocations for which they will face charge of criminal conspiracy.

Comments

 

Other News

Gandhian movement after Gandhi failed: Ram Guha

The Gandhian movement in India, after Gandhi’s death, failed, says Ramachandra Guha, and blames Vinoba Bhave for it. But the movement found new, fertile grounds around the world and succeeded in bringing about a change in South Africa, the US and elsewhere. It is high time it returned home. Of cour

When religion, politics and Bollywood come together

Tavleen Singh, noted journalist and political commentator, has turned to fiction, with her debut novel ‘The Actor’ (HaperCollins India). Set in the near future, it has a superstar, Amit Singh, turning to politics, when the political landscape is dominated by prime minister Guru Gaynendraj

Cabinet approves setting up of Integrated Transport & Logistics Authority

The union cabinet, chaired by prime minister Narendra Modi, on Tuesday approved the setting up of a Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV), called Integrated Transport & Logistics Authority (ITLA), to strengthen research, planning, appraisal, monitoring and impact assessment within the broad domains of Transp

Why foundational literacy and numeracy is key to school education

Foundational Literacy and Numeracy (FLN) are often described as the building blocks of education. Yet, their significance goes well beyond a child’s ability to read a sentence, write a response or solve a basic mathematical problem. These foundational skills shape how children understand the world,

When police data becomes the algorithm

For decades, policing has followed a familiar sequence: a crime occurs, the police respond, an investigation produces records and those records become part of the institutional memory of the criminal justice system. Artificial intelligence is beginning to alter that sequence. Instead of merely recording

Before India voted, the framers worried about the referee

“We are making a Constitution forever and not only for today.” Shibban Lal Saksena said this in the Constituent Assembly on June 15, 1949. He was warning that a ruling party might one day choose a loyalist to run India’s elections. Seventy-seven years later, the Supreme Court is wrestli

Upcoming Conferences



-->

Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter