Experts back Ramesh move on bamboo trade share for tribals

Environment minister intends to end forest department's monopoly on bamboo trade

PTI | April 19, 2011



Experts in the Bamboo industry have welcomed forests and environment minister Jairam Ramesh's initiative on ending monopoly of the forest department on bamboo trade in the country and making it available without any restriction to tribals, who have forest rights.

"This could be the beginning. But the ideal situation for developing bamboo processing industry would be when bamboo is freed completely from the draconian laws restricting its plantation and transportation," Pratap Goswami, a bamboo consultant, told PTI.

Ramesh recently wrote to all state chief ministers to direct their state forest officers to treat bamboo as a minor produce. The Forest Rights Act in 2006 defined bamboo as minor forest produce but forest officials refused to deal with it accordingly and instead held a monopoly control on the trade.

Goswami said that activists in Maharashtra have been waging a struggle against the forest department's control on bamboo for long.

"Despite all efforts the state government has not come out with the much-needed bamboo policy to compliment the twin national missions on bamboo and its applications floated by the Union government to promote use of bamboo as alternative to forest timber," he said.

Goswami, who has been assigned a special task as bamboo consultant by the Government, believes that the Union Minister has made this announcement to facilitate 'Nistar' rights of tribals and "to make it easier for traditional tribal craftsmen using bamboo, special powers could be given to gram sabhas to issue transport permits," he said.

Describing the initiative as "positive" Goswami said insensitive forest officials deprived tribals of raw material that could help them earn a living.

"Bamboo is left decaying in depots and released to 'burads' (craftsmen) only when it is useless," he said hoping that now things would change soon.

But the real difference can be made only when bamboo that is 'grass', is de-classified from the forest laws which accords it the status of 'tree', the consultant said.

Even the Supreme Court in a judgement has exempted bamboo from the forest department's restrictive laws. But several states are reluctant to open up the bamboo industry mainly because strong lobby of forest officials have vested interests in retaining the control regime, said a bamboo technologist on the condition of anonymity.

After China, India is the second largest producer of bamboo. But while China has taken giant strides in its exploitation commercially, we are wasting the golden opportunity. At least, bamboo grown in private plantations (of a different species compared to those naturally found in forests) should be spared from all controls, Goswami said.

Only then it would be accepted as an alternative to crops like cotton by farmers in Vidarbha who are driven to suicide when traditional cash crops fail. Once private plantations succeed, bamboo processing industry with a potential of Rs 2,000 crore economy could flourish, he said.

Processed bamboos is an eco-friendly product and go a long way in saving forests from where timber is felled recklessly for human needs.

Comments

 

Other News

Distinguishing Fish 1 and Fish 2: The pragmatism behind India’s WTO ratification

 India became the 123rd WTO member to ratify the multilateral Agreement on Fisheries subsidies (AoFS) when it deposited the Instrument of Acceptance for Phase 1 on July 20, 2026. The ratification is restricted to disciplining Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated fishing (IUU), protection for overfished

The 7% growth problem: Why the next 7% will be harder

India has become accustomed to hearing the 7% growth number. It is now less a milestone than an expectation. Yet the paradox is becoming clearer: maintaining 7% growth may be considerably harder than achieving it once. India’s real GDP grew 7.7% in FY2025–26, following growth of 6.5% in FY202

The Constitution cannot be altered: Justice Abhay Oka

Justice Abhay Oka, who retired from the Supreme Court in May 2025, has said that the Constitution of India cannot be altered. Explaining the landmark Kesavananda Bharati judgment (1973) on the basic structure of the Constitution, he said, “This is one judgment that has saved democracy in India.&rdq

How the flora and fauna evolved in the Indian subcontinent

Mammals of India  By A.J.T. Johnsingh and P.O. Nameer HarperCollins India in association with Bombay Natural History Society  

India`s renewable race is moving beyond megawatts

When Shell bought Sprng Energy in 2022, India`s renewable energy market appeared to offer precisely what global energy majors were seeking: scale, growth and a place in one of the world`s largest energy transitions. Four years later, Shell is selling the same business to Aditya Birla Group for an enterpris

Nepal Floods: India keeps close watch on the situation

India`s central government has been keeping a close watch on the situation arising out of the flash flood in Nepal on Wednesday. Union home minister Amit Shah spoke with the chief ministers of Bihar and Uttar Pradesh, the two states that share the border with Nepal, regarding the disaster

Upcoming Conferences



-->

Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter