HC takes notice of divided SIT in Ishrat case

One of the members has objected to the appointment of amicus curie before Guj HC

PTI | January 14, 2011



The rift within the Special Investigation Team (SIT) probing the 2004 encounter of Ishrat Jahan has been exposed, with one of the members objecting to the demand to appoint amicus curie before Gujarat High Court.

SIT member Satish Verma, who yesterday filed an affidavit before the division bench of Justices Jayant Patel and Abhilasha Kumari, has also complained about the 'attitude' of the SIT chairman Karnal Singh.

The division bench was hearing the application filed by Singh seeking appointment of amicus curie for providing legal assistance to SIT, yesterday.

Verma has claimed in the affidavit that Chairman Singh approached the court in his "personal capacity" without taking Verma into confidence, and the application was moved without consensus within SIT.

Verma further states that appointment of a lawyer is the state government's responsibility and amicus curie is supposed to be neutral, who cannot advise SIT.

Looking at differences between SIT members, the court said that it will have to work out a functioning-model for SIT to ensure that "sanctity and spirit of its order is not paralysed due to difference of opinions amongst members".

The High Court directed Singh to remain present on January 28 along with other members of SIT, when next hearing will take place.

The court also asked whether there was any "group-ism" in the SIT, to which Verma submitted that there were differences, and Singh's attitude to the case was such that investigation would ultimately suffer.

The other SIT member, Mohan Jha, who was also present, informed the court that Singh had informally discussed the issue of getting legal assistance, during a meeting at a guest house in Mehsana.

Backing Singh, Jha said that such differences between members could hamper investigation.

The present three-member SIT was formed by the Gujarat High Court on September 24, 2010 to probe encounter of Mumbai-based Ishrat Jahan, Javed Ghulam Sheikh alias Pranesh Kumar Pillai, Amjad Ali alias Rajkumar Akbar Ali Rana and Jisan Johar Abdul Gani by the crime branch near Ahmedabad over six years ago.

Comments

 

Other News

Counting matters but which ones?

The first instinct of public policy is to count. Its harder task is to count what counts. We have become remarkably good at measuring the reach of the welfare state vis-à-vis beneficiaries covered, rupees transferred, houses built, connections installed and services delivered. But some of the most

Inching closer to a trade deal with America

The cooperation between India and the United States goes back quite a time. We need to relegate that era to the backburner when Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru visited US in the times of president Dwight Eisenhower and called the American let-off of 10 million dollars in defence aid to Pakistan as a “gun w

Manch vs Musk: Forty people and a foreign billionaire

About forty people walked the roundabout on Teen Murti Marg to the gate of Chanakyapuri police station, a distance you could cover in under a minute, on Friday to protest against Elon Musk’s Starlink. The walk was called by the Swadeshi Jagaran Manch. Nobody joined them on the way, and nobody seeme

Master sculptor recalls the making of the Shankaracharya statue

The Golden Chisel: The Story Behind the Making of Ram Lalla  By Seethalakshmi S. and Rahul Nandan Rupa Publications, 168 pages, Rs 395  

Mumbai’s missing affordable homes

Mumbai’s real estate market keeps growing, yet homeownership remains out of reach for much of its population. Three experts – urban researcher Hussain Indorewala, urban planner Vidyadhar Phatak and developer Kamlesh Thakur of NAREDCO Maharashtra, agree that simply constructing more apartments

Rubio denies US foreknowledge of Starlink restrictions in Ukraine

US secretary of state Marco Rubio has said he was unfamiliar with the Wall Street Journal report suggesting Elon Musk had decided to throttle Starlink services in Ukraine, but rejected claims that Washington had ordered the restrictions to pressure Kyiv.   “There was no

Upcoming Conferences



-->

Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter