Hyderabad blasts: why it’s too early to zoom in on the IM angle

Because it’s inane, a theory rid with holes at this point and premature, as home minister Shinde pointed out in his one bright moment after Thursday’s twin blasts in Hyderabad

shantanu

Shantanu Datta | February 22, 2013


The blast site at Hyderabad`s Dilsukhnagar: No reason to jump to conclusion about IM`s involvement yet, says home mminister Shinde after visiting crime scene.
The blast site at Hyderabad`s Dilsukhnagar: No reason to jump to conclusion about IM`s involvement yet, says home mminister Shinde after visiting crime scene.

The only smart thing union home minister Suskhilkumar Shinde has said since the twin-blasts in Hyderabad on Thursday evening is, to misquote Churchill, a naught wrapped in zilch inside a zero. Asked about the involvement of the suspected terror group behind the blasts, Shinde on Thursday said nothing can be said at the moment.

On Friday morning, after visiting the blast site in Hyderabad’s busy Dilsukhnagar, Shinde said the death toll in the blasts is now 14 and 119 people were injured. Asked about the involvement of the suspected terror group behind the blasts, he said it was too early to blame any organisation or outfit, including Indian Mujahideen, for the blasts.

He also made some additional revelations, saying those who masterminded the blasts will be identified and arrested soon. “We will leave no stone unturned to achieve the result immediately,” he told reporters.

According to a report in the Hindu, Shinde reached Hyderabad early morning and drove straight to the blast sites amid tight security. He was accompanied by Andhra Pradesh governor ESL Narasimhan, chief minister N Kiran Kumr Reddy and top officials of the state police and the National Investigation Agency (NIA). State Congress president Botsa Satyanarayana, home minister P Sabitha Reddy, major industries minister J Geetha Reddy, director-general of police V Dinesh Reddy and others were also in his entourage.

There is nothing to suggest that the high-profile trip to the blast site has enlightened our home minister because he still can't decide if he should hand over the investigation to the NIA, but he should be applauded for not rushing to put the blame on the Indian Mujahideen (IM).

Suspicion that the blasts were the handiwork of the IM are based primarily on the modus operandi. The home-grown terror outfit, it is said, is known to have placed bombs in tiffin boxes on bikes or bicycles, and leave them at crowded places during peak hours in its earlier attacks, picked up low-cost and easily-available explosives and the relatively crude modes of detonation.

Ammonium nitrate, a chemical as easily available as you can think of, was used in the Dilsukhnagar blasts, investigators have found, and with the rest of the boxes ticked, it does not take a rocket scientist to zero in on IM.

Simple logic says once you zero in on the modus operandi, and trace the presence of the module or group of the terror group in the vicinity in days or months leading up to the blasts, it is easier to go after the perpetrators. Ergo the theory: since two of the Pune blast suspects arrested by Delhi police in October 2012, said to be IM operatives, had recced Hyderabad last year, chances are IM is behind the blasts.

According to a release issued by Delhi police’s special cell on October 26, 2012, the duo arrested — Syed Maqbool and Imran Khan — did a “recce of Dilkhush (sic) Nagar, Begum Bazar and Abids in Hyderabad on a motorcycle. This was done on the instruction of Riyaz Bhatkal (the IM chief).”

It is all going as per theory but for a couple of hiccups: the same boxes were checked for the blast in Pune in August last year as well, and the investigations are yet to reach any conclusion.

If the modus operandi at the Dilsukhnagar blasts is the basis behind zeroing in on IM, it beats logic that there should be only one Riyaz Bhatkal who can mastermind such attacks.  Every terrorist would look for easily available and low-cost chemical (umm, ammonium nitrate), look for carriers easily available, low-cost and difficult-to trace back to the owner (voila, bicycles!), low-cost and unsophisticated detonators (easily assembled) and find aluminum tiffin boxes to pack them in (again, low-cost, easily available and hard to trace back to owner), right?

Serious investigation involves looking for far more critical and credible clues before associating names of organisations with such attacks. But that is compromised when investigations are purportedly taken over by TV channels trying to be the "first" to reveal the name of the terror group even before the reverberations of the blast have died down. Why should our first concern be to know the terrorist rather than attend to the terrorised? Who cares whether it is IM, HuJi, ABS (Abhinav Bharat Sanghatan) or any other alphabetical concoction that has caused the tragedy?

Why can't we leave that for later, for thorough investigation? Why can't we, for once, listen to our home minister?  
 

Comments

 

Other News

Here’s an I.D.E.A. for career growth and success

Success in today’s professional organisation is no longer solely determined by academic qualifications, technical expertise or years of experience. While these attributes do matter, organisations increasingly value individuals who demonstrate the right mindset and behavioural qualities. The ability

PM interacts with CEOs, founders of space startups

Prime minister Narendra Modi interacted with CEOs and Founders of 20 Space Startups at Seva Teerth on Friday.   CEOs of leading companies in the space sector working in diverse fields ranging from building rockets and reusable semi-cryogenic launch vehicles, avionics, satelli

From one cow to a dairy business

In 2012, Anita Dash wasn`t dreaming of building a dairy brand. She wasn`t studying business models or planning market expansion. Like countless mothers across India, her focus was on something much simpler: giving her children a better future.   At the time, her most valuable

Ethanol blending: The two sides of a story

India`s crude oil consumption is estimated to be around 88.5% imported from abroad. This one single figure is also responsible for why ethanol has become both an economic strategy and fuel policy at the same time. In an economy like India, which depends so heavily on foreign oil, any increase in internat

Food inflation: Not a macroeconomic statistic but a developmental indicator

India`s retail inflation shows a reassuring picture at first glance. According to the latest data, Consumer Price Index (CPI) inflation edged up to 4.38% in June 2026 from 3.93% in May 2026, but continued to remain within the Reserve Bank of India`s (RBI) target band of 4% (+/- 2%). However, beneath this

Skin in the game or masterful market timing?

When a company founder opens their personal chequebook to buy shares in their own business, stock markets usually applaud. To the average retail investor, it feels like the ultimate vote of confidence, a sign that the people running the show have real skin in the game and believe brighter days are ahead.

Upcoming Conferences



-->

Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter