(Editor's note: This article, written in September 2013, soon after the BJP announced Narendra Modi as the party's PM candidate, reflects on the "fragility of the Indian ego" and its enactments in Indian politics. This is just as relevant today, now that party patriarch LK Advani, along with former PM Atal Bihari Vajpayee and senior leader MM Joshi, has been 'shunted out' of the BJP's decision-making bodies. We replay the article.) 

You have to be an Indian to understand the subtlety of certain nuanced social conducts and their interpretations. Gujarat chief minister Narendra Modi touching LK Advani’s feet and the veteran’s apparent lack of warmth might have amused those without roots in traditions but the incident was bound evoke curiosity among traditional Indians. This was why the media gave various interpretations to the incident at the rally of BJP workers in Bhopal on Wednesday.

Was Modi deferential to Advani? Has Advani snubbed him by looking the other way? Is this indicative of simmering discontent at the top level of BJP despite the public show of bonhomie and mutual respect? Media will for long keep speculating and trying to decipher the meaning of this utterly nuanced public conduct that is shrouded in the mystery of individual minds.

In reality, the genuine explanation of such conducts could only be attained if either Modi or Advani bares his mind. There is a possibility that both would not have given so much thought to their instinctive action and given to the natural impulse which comes to an average Indian in a social gathering. But this charitable view would be totally unacceptable to those who read too much in the symbolism.

And there is a history that bears them out. In the past Modi had never shown such a deferential behaviour to Advani in public. At times his public conduct with him bordered on abrasiveness and indifference which go well with his cultivated larger-than-life image. But those who know the Sangh Parivar would say that there had always been reservation within the saffron brotherhood of public display of obeisance by touching feet. This new political culture was introduced when the BJP emerged as an influential party, they point out.

What is certainly curious is the amount of speculation generated in the media by such symbolism. These gestures are apparently devoid of any political content. But in a society where family quarrels like those among saas-bahu or siblings tend to snowball into a massive political fracas, the significance of such symbolism can hardly be undermined. Isn’t it a fact that Maneka Gandhi walked out of Indira Gandhi’s house in a manner which conforms to the script of Saas Bahu Ki Tu Tu Me Me? And isn’t it a fact that Kalyan Singh, once a powerful leader in the BJP, could not bear the repeated snubs by Atal Bihari Vajpayee and ultimately left the BJP? There are many such examples which are indicative of fragility of Indian ego on symbolism and result chaos.