Pachauri won't apologise, admits IPCC's credibility damaged

"You can't expect me to be personally responsible for every word in a 3,000-page report", Pachauri says to defend himself

PTI | February 3, 2010



Top Indian scientist Rajendra Pachauri has refused to apologise for a false claim made in a landmark report by the UN climate change panel headed by him that Himalayan glaciers could melt away by 2035, even as he admitted that the mistake had damaged the body's credibility.

"You can't expect me to be personally responsible for every word in a 3,000-page report," Pachauri said in an interview to the 'Guardian', asserting that he would not resign.

The UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has already issued a statement that expressed regret for the mistake, but Pachauri said a personal apology would be a "populist" step.

"I don't do too many populist things, that's why I'm so unpopular with a certain section of society," he told the paper.

Pachauri, however, admitted that the mistake had seriously damaged the IPCC's credibility and boosted the efforts of climate sceptics.

"It was an isolated mistake, down to human error and totally out of character" for the panel, he said.

But, Pachauri said "it does not undermine the basic truth that human activity is causing temperatures to rise."

Pachauri's comments came even as a report about e-mails stolen from the University of East Anglia showed how climate scientists acted to keep research papers they did not like out of academic journals.

Pachauri defended the IPCC's use of so called "grey literature" - sources outside peer-reviewed academic journals, such as reports from campaign groups, companies and student theses.

He said in its next report on climate, IPCC would stress to authors and reviewers the importance of checking sources.

"Our procedures are very clear on the use of grey literature. Whenever an author uses grey literature they need to double check the source of information is authentic and defensible.

"People have been using grey literature for quite some time now. Apparently in this (Himalayan glacier) case there has been a failure because authors did not follow the procedures required," the climate czar said.

He also rebutted newspaper reports that he lived a lavish lifestyle and wore USD 1,000 worth suits.

"It's ridiculous and it's a bunch of lies," Pachauri said.
 

Comments

 

Other News

Gandhian movement after Gandhi failed: Ram Guha

The Gandhian movement in India, after Gandhi’s death, failed, says Ramachandra Guha, and blames Vinoba Bhave for it. But the movement found new, fertile grounds around the world and succeeded in bringing about a change in South Africa, the US and elsewhere. It is high time it returned home. Of cour

When religion, politics and Bollywood come together

Tavleen Singh, noted journalist and political commentator, has turned to fiction, with her debut novel ‘The Actor’ (HaperCollins India). Set in the near future, it has a superstar, Amit Singh, turning to politics, when the political landscape is dominated by prime minister Guru Gaynendraj

Cabinet approves setting up of Integrated Transport & Logistics Authority

The union cabinet, chaired by prime minister Narendra Modi, on Tuesday approved the setting up of a Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV), called Integrated Transport & Logistics Authority (ITLA), to strengthen research, planning, appraisal, monitoring and impact assessment within the broad domains of Transp

Why foundational literacy and numeracy is key to school education

Foundational Literacy and Numeracy (FLN) are often described as the building blocks of education. Yet, their significance goes well beyond a child’s ability to read a sentence, write a response or solve a basic mathematical problem. These foundational skills shape how children understand the world,

When police data becomes the algorithm

For decades, policing has followed a familiar sequence: a crime occurs, the police respond, an investigation produces records and those records become part of the institutional memory of the criminal justice system. Artificial intelligence is beginning to alter that sequence. Instead of merely recording

Before India voted, the framers worried about the referee

“We are making a Constitution forever and not only for today.” Shibban Lal Saksena said this in the Constituent Assembly on June 15, 1949. He was warning that a ruling party might one day choose a loyalist to run India’s elections. Seventy-seven years later, the Supreme Court is wrestli

Upcoming Conferences



-->

Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter