UPA had said ‘no’ to surgical strikes after 26/11

The coalition UPA government headed by Manmohan Singh was not ready to risk escalation of tensions with Pakistan

aasha

Aasha Khosa | September 29, 2016 | New Delhi


#Pakistan   #Manmohan Singh   #UPA   #surgical strikes   #Mumbai attack   #NIA   #Pakistan  


The idea of punishing Pakistan for sending terrorists to strike at targets in India was mulled during the UPA rule after 10 terrorists of Lashkar-e-Toiba had attacked multiple locations in Mumbai on September 26 in 2008.

 
A surgical strike on Jamat-ul-dawah – a seminary cum terrorist recruitment center run by the Lashkar head and cleric close to Pakistan army Hafiz Saeed at Muridke near Lahore - would have been an appropriate response to the three-day blood bath carried out by terrorists leaving over 160, including nationals of five countries, dead and 308 wounded. Due to the enormity of the crime perpetrated by terrorists, who were Pakistani citizens, India would have received a huge global support.
 
But the surgical strike didn’t happen, for the coalition government of UPA headed by Manmohan Singh was not ready to risk escalation of tensions with Pakistan. Instead of knocking the Muridke township off the map, the UPA government had then chosen to augment country’s defenses against such terrorist strikes. The National Investigating Agency had emerged out of this decision.

READ: Meanwhile on Twitter, Indians and Pakistanis go to war
 
 So, it’s for the first time that India’s elite Special Forces have crossed the line of control, the 800 km de facto border, that was the ceasefire line ordered by the United Nations security council between the two nations after Pakistan had attacked India with the intention of grabbing Kashmir, barely a year after the partition.
 
A surgical strike is not a conventional warfare but a limited offensive aimed at destroying targets which are inimical to the security of the country undertaking it. So, Pakistan can’t take the four-hour strike as India’s war cry and escalate tension in the region.
 
Pakistan’s denial of the operation is along the expected lines, as it has never owned up terrorists, or their presence in the border outposts along the LoC, which are launch pads of terrorists headed to Kashmir. Remember, Pakistan has not even accepted that Ajmal Kasab, who had to hang for Mumbai attack in Yerwada jail in 2012, as its national. How would the army and Nawaz Sharif government, which is facing shame of countries boycotting SAARC meet in Islamabad, would accept that Indian army had indeed attacked terrorist camps-cum-border outposts of Pakistan army?
 

Comments

 

Other News

Regulating the data advantage: India’s new e-Commerce framework

For over a decade, India’s e-commerce story has rested on a simple premise: platforms connect buyers and sellers, while data fuels efficiency, personalisation, and scale. However, as the market matured, its structure has revealed a growing imbalance. E-commerce platforms, especially marketplace ent

Changing weather patterns, climate change responsible for Nepal floods

The interaction between active Western Disturbances, increased atmospheric moisture and the region’s complex topography aswell as global warming are important factors behind intense rainfall in the Himalayas, leading to flash floods in Nepal, according to meteorologists. Nepal

A right she cannot reach

Last summer, the two of us spent several weeks in rural Madhya Pradesh with a non-profit that works on gender justice through women’s self-help groups. We went in with a notebook full of laws. The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act. The Dowry Prohibition Act. Free legal aid for every wo

Tier-2 cities lead India’s digital credit push

Digital payments have become a reflex for urban India, but the confidence earned in paying has not yet carried over to borrowing. That is the central finding of `How Urban India Pays Report 2026`, released by Pahlé India Foundation in collaboration with Amazon Pay. Based on a survey of 5,149 consu

India calls for doubling bilateral trade with UK by 2030

Commerce and industry minister Piyush Goyal has called upon businesses in India and the United Kingdom to translate the opportunities created by the India-UK Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) into expanded trade, investment, partnerships and job creation. Addressing the Bu

Gandhian movement after Gandhi failed: Ram Guha

The Gandhian movement in India, after Gandhi’s death, failed, says Ramachandra Guha, and blames Vinoba Bhave for it. But the movement found new, fertile grounds around the world and succeeded in bringing about a change in South Africa, the US and elsewhere. It is high time it returned home. Of cour

Upcoming Conferences



-->

Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter